After a moment of confusion at his appointment I supported it. Made sense with his CV as a person to take us to the proverbial next level.I stayed with him until late December, just. Now I want him away from Villa Park. Results alone are enough, but everything else too documented here to repeat, make his tenure untenable.He has failed us. He simply has no respect from his players. They are demotivated and confused. That is a management problem.Get rid of him now. Some of us older guys said that in December that it smelt of relegation. Then a bit of positivety and a big signing(s) slowed down the abuse but results, and player/supporter unrest is now even worse. For good reasons.The risk of direct action is huge but inaction is worse. We will go down with this man in charge. The team needs inspiration and clarity of purpose. ie some tactical and positioning continuity. And some bloody fight. And a mature solution to the internal bickering. GH cannot supply that motivation or put fire in their bellies.
I really want us to win the next 2 games, move away from relegation just to stop all this talk of Big Sam. I have always got impression he don't like us anyway, I know I don't like his approach and his stupid ear piece, please no.
i also cant help thinking that the training regime has something to do with the injury situation
Those who say that these disputes should be kept on the training ground or in the manager's office.Imagine, for a moment, that issues have been raised by the players regarding defensive training; issues regarding defending of set-pieces, defensive tactics being different for reserves, youths and first team. The players are unsure of their individual and collective roles whilst defending, for example, corners.What if, when the players raised these issues and concerns, nothing was done about it? And if the concerns that were raised, and the subsequent inaction of the coaching/management staff, resulted in a huge amount of goals and points being surrendered?The players would be feeling, quite rightly in my opinion, a little bit disappointed that their concerns weren't taken on board. Let's imagine that they were labelled as trouble makers and dissenters for raising their concerns. If they were called, in front of their colleagues, "traitors".Then, imagine if the management commented in public that the defensive problems were purely of the player's making, that the management were as baffled as anyone as to why there were problems. And if the management were to say, in private, that these players are paid to defend and they should just defend "and stop asking questions".What if the management responded to the player's concerns by leaving angry voicemail messages, lambasting a player's commitment and accusing them of "treachery"?At what stage are the players to be forgiven for getting so frustrated that their patience snaps?I am not condoning any players actions, nor am I commenting on any specific incident. Let's call this a hypothetical situation.When are the players forgiven for taking their concerns out from the training ground and manager's office?
I'd take relegation over Allardyce being manager. Never in a million years should his name ever be mentioned when discussing the Villa's management position.
I don't really want Kevin McDonald back in charge but even Kevin the gerbil would be better than this muppet.