I don't imagine many of those think he's doing a good job though.
Big Sam would maybe kick some ass and shore us up abit at he back he has good experience and many in he game respect him, unfortunatley for us Houlier hasn'tQuote from: gregnash on March 20, 2011, 01:36:45 PMQuote from: Clark W Griswold on March 20, 2011, 01:24:09 PMAlladyce for the run in, yes. Not long term. I genuinely think he would grind us 10 points out that would probably keep us safe. Long term, Moyes or Owen Coyle. Hughes is well over rated, and Jol would not be much better. I don't disagree he'd grind out the results, but i'd say the only advantage we have over the likes of Wolves on paper is we have a few in the squad who can play at bit. Bringing big sam in would thrown that advantage away in the hope we can match them in the effort stakes. With some of snakes in our squad i really doubt it.
Quote from: Clark W Griswold on March 20, 2011, 01:24:09 PMAlladyce for the run in, yes. Not long term. I genuinely think he would grind us 10 points out that would probably keep us safe. Long term, Moyes or Owen Coyle. Hughes is well over rated, and Jol would not be much better. I don't disagree he'd grind out the results, but i'd say the only advantage we have over the likes of Wolves on paper is we have a few in the squad who can play at bit. Bringing big sam in would thrown that advantage away in the hope we can match them in the effort stakes. With some of snakes in our squad i really doubt it.
Alladyce for the run in, yes. Not long term. I genuinely think he would grind us 10 points out that would probably keep us safe. Long term, Moyes or Owen Coyle. Hughes is well over rated, and Jol would not be much better.
We shouldn't worry about fairness, apportioning blame, or anything else that's happened up to this point. We, or rather Randy, should only worry about what will keep us up.
Quote from: Percy on March 20, 2011, 02:15:59 PMWe shouldn't worry about fairness, apportioning blame, or anything else that's happened up to this point. We, or rather Randy, should only worry about what will keep us up.I honestly don't think that Lerner has a clue what to do.
Quote from: Cuz on March 20, 2011, 01:31:08 PM46 vote No well that fucking amazes me, what make the 46 think he deserves to stay in the job can't believe itI'd hazard a guess not many of those 46 were down B6 yesterday
46 vote No well that fucking amazes me, what make the 46 think he deserves to stay in the job can't believe it
Quote from: WikiVilla on March 20, 2011, 01:35:13 PMQuote from: Cuz on March 20, 2011, 01:31:08 PM46 vote No well that fucking amazes me, what make the 46 think he deserves to stay in the job can't believe itI'd hazard a guess not many of those 46 were down B6 yesterdayWell you'd be wrong in my case.The timing is all wrong to make a change now, it takes weeks to sort out a manager as we don't have anyone suitable for a caretaker role because we've alrwady managerd to fuck up Kevin Mac's reputation this season. It's a time for cool heads, not to give in to the baying mob.I think the talk of Fat Sam for 8 games is a non starter. I just don't see he is ego coping with being told that whatever he does he isn't going to have the job long term. I'd also argue that taking yesterday as the example of how we are going to perform for the rest of the season as risky as using the Blackburn game. We're not that predictable.There is a big decision to be made but the summer is the time to do that.