Quote from: Somniloquism on August 07, 2012, 08:39:46 PMHow come the Americans are allowed to race in their PJ's when the rest of the women have to run in their knickers?Having checked quite a few pairs of knickers and all in ones in the last few days - I can confirm they are free to wear what they want providing it fits the rules on adverts. I could bore you with IOC rule 50 but won't.
How come the Americans are allowed to race in their PJ's when the rest of the women have to run in their knickers?
2. Does Philips Idowu receive public funding? - I know he says not but UK athletics suggest he does.
Quote from: lovejoy on August 07, 2012, 10:15:59 PMBBC commentators seemed convinced 1500 metres winner Makhloufi was doping. Either they know something we don't or they 're going to owe someone an apology.I thought the race looked odd. He ran the middle 200m of the last lap in 25 secs and blew a field full of Kenyans away. His improvement has come from nowhere apparently which always gets suspicions up by those who look closely at these things.
BBC commentators seemed convinced 1500 metres winner Makhloufi was doping. Either they know something we don't or they 're going to owe someone an apology.
Quote from: nick harper on August 07, 2012, 10:31:10 PMQuote from: lovejoy on August 07, 2012, 10:15:59 PMBBC commentators seemed convinced 1500 metres winner Makhloufi was doping. Either they know something we don't or they 're going to owe someone an apology.I thought the race looked odd. He ran the middle 200m of the last lap in 25 secs and blew a field full of Kenyans away. His improvement has come from nowhere apparently which always gets suspicions up by those who look closely at these things.They described him as "contoversial" and seemed distinctly non-plussed when he won. I thought it was a bit unprofessional really. He'd just won the Olympic final, give him a bit of credit. If he then fails a dugs test that's the time to criticise.
What I dont understand is in the cycling Pendleton's opponent clearly elbowed her and should have lost the first leg of the final. But we didnt object......why not?
This wasn't him going a bit faster than expected (like the young swimmer), or even Ben Johnson who at that time just seemed mind blowingly fast (and also very early in our awareness of drug assisted sport), this was a bizarre series of events culminating in the most unlikely looking race I have ever seen.
Why does no-one suspect Bolt of drugs after what he's achieved? Or do people and I've missed it?