As I've been saying on other threads, if MON had stayed on, we would have had an uninterested, dispirited MON as manager, dejected by not having money to spend and because he was overlooked for the Liverpool job. Whether results had been as bad as under Houllier, I don't know, but I don't think the table would have been a pretty sight in any case.The interesting point is the claim that Lerner wanted a new manager as different to MON as possible. If the rumours that we prefered Moyes are correct, then the claim seems unprobable. But if it is true, then we should perhaps ask if the board had expected (or at leasted feared) the kind of situation we are in now. Everyone knows that an organization needs time to adapt, and thus, that change should be implemented gradually. Even so, it looks as if we, in a remarkably short period of time, have gone from a plan involving laissez-faire spending on players with a traditional British manager in charge to one involving nurturing of home-grown talent and bargain signings combined with careful long-term planning by an experienced French football academic. Plans don't come much different than those two.