Our penalty was the most obvious penalty award I have seen in a long time. There was no need to appeal as everyone knew it was 100% nailed on. Very surprised that Essien did not get booked.
Quote from: aftab235 on January 03, 2011, 12:04:30 AMOur penalty was the most obvious penalty award I have seen in a long time. There was no need to appeal as everyone knew it was 100% nailed on. Very surprised that Essien did not get booked.Watch it again then, carefully, and explain to me why NRC throws his arms up in frustration and very evidently thinks the ref has blown for a foul against him? It was so obvious that even the player fouled didn't realise it was a pen? Hmmmm......
Quote from: richard moore on January 03, 2011, 10:01:05 AMQuote from: aftab235 on January 03, 2011, 12:04:30 AMOur penalty was the most obvious penalty award I have seen in a long time. There was no need to appeal as everyone knew it was 100% nailed on. Very surprised that Essien did not get booked.Watch it again then, carefully, and explain to me why NRC throws his arms up in frustration and very evidently thinks the ref has blown for a foul against him? It was so obvious that even the player fouled didn't realise it was a pen? Hmmmm......My interpretation of NRC throwing his arms up was he felt he had a stonewall penalty and that the knobhead ref wouldn't give it
Quote from: CJ on January 03, 2011, 10:14:44 AMQuote from: richard moore on January 03, 2011, 10:01:05 AMQuote from: aftab235 on January 03, 2011, 12:04:30 AMOur penalty was the most obvious penalty award I have seen in a long time. There was no need to appeal as everyone knew it was 100% nailed on. Very surprised that Essien did not get booked.Watch it again then, carefully, and explain to me why NRC throws his arms up in frustration and very evidently thinks the ref has blown for a foul against him? It was so obvious that even the player fouled didn't realise it was a pen? Hmmmm......My interpretation of NRC throwing his arms up was he felt he had a stonewall penalty and that the knobhead ref wouldn't give itAs I said, watch it again carefully. You will see quite clearly that NRC thinks a foul has been given against him and almost doesn't know what to do when he sees it is, in fact, a pen his way
Quote from: richard moore on January 03, 2011, 10:26:45 AMQuote from: CJ on January 03, 2011, 10:14:44 AMQuote from: richard moore on January 03, 2011, 10:01:05 AMQuote from: aftab235 on January 03, 2011, 12:04:30 AMOur penalty was the most obvious penalty award I have seen in a long time. There was no need to appeal as everyone knew it was 100% nailed on. Very surprised that Essien did not get booked.Watch it again then, carefully, and explain to me why NRC throws his arms up in frustration and very evidently thinks the ref has blown for a foul against him? It was so obvious that even the player fouled didn't realise it was a pen? Hmmmm......My interpretation of NRC throwing his arms up was he felt he had a stonewall penalty and that the knobhead ref wouldn't give itAs I said, watch it again carefully. You will see quite clearly that NRC thinks a foul has been given against him and almost doesn't know what to do when he sees it is, in fact, a pen his wayMaybe he threw his arms thinking the ref wasn't going to give the penalty?
I think centre-midfield is a bit of a thorny one for us to deal with in some ways, although I suppose the easy answer is 'buy someone better'!I had originally thought that Delph would be a replacement for NRC, but on reflection I think he's more a candidate to replace Petrov. He is hard-working and can keep posession well, like Petrov, but he has a lot more energy and, I think, a more creative element to his passing. Alongside NRC (or a possible upgrade, although I still think Reo-Coker can be a very good player in the right role), I think Delph might just add something to our midfield in the same way as Milner did.