collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Toronto Villa
[Today at 07:29:36 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 07:24:53 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by john e
[Today at 07:22:25 PM]


Jacob Ramsey - Gone by VillaTim
[Today at 07:20:12 PM]


Unai Emery by Louzie0
[Today at 07:17:35 PM]


The Barton's Arms by dave.woodhall
[Today at 07:10:16 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R1: Brentford v ASTON VILLA, Saturday 23rd August! 🥅 by littleoldme
[Today at 06:57:03 PM]


International Rugby by nigel
[Today at 06:39:17 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII  (Read 84370 times)

Offline Surrey Villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 636
  • Location: Now Malvern. Over The Hill. Must change my name?
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #120 on: December 05, 2010, 03:40:51 PM »
General,

I understand that club officials are meeting with Blues officials in the next week to discuss the problems on Wednesday.

This is my idea to suggest to them...

Would it be possible for the non-violent majority to hold up a massive banner at the next Blues game saying "BLUES AGAINST HOOLIGANISM" or some such thing?

I think a lot of fans see themselves as upholding club pride by behaving like pricks to opposing fans, would be nice for them to see that most of their own fans can't stand them.

If Blues do this I see no reason why Villa can't do similarly (obviously "VILLA AGAINST HOOLIGANISM") in our next home game.


I witnessed with disgust the destruction in the toilets but there was no sign of police or even stewards.  Surely it would be cost-effective for both clubs, knowing it is certain to happen again, to employ some effective security against these yobs who would at least think twice and probably run away like the cowards they are, similar to the Blues fans on the pitch when the police line moved forward.  Incidentally, to those 'fans' singing "what a F***ing Shithole" while peeing up the wall OUTSIDE the toilets, have you seen the facilities we have in the North Stand?

Offline Salsa Party Animal

  • Member
  • Posts: 2144
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Trinity Road Lower Stand or Dance-floor or Bedroom.
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/Salsapartyanimal
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #121 on: December 05, 2010, 06:39:45 PM »
I have been watching The Pacific (from makers of bands of brothers) this week and it is very interesting history and drama about World War II in Pacific Circle and about a group of US Marines. It must be awful with bad weather, no cover, and Japanese fighting method. It also mentioned John Basilone.

Have you seen it.

Offline ckrulak

  • Member
  • Posts: 1301
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #122 on: December 05, 2010, 10:39:36 PM »
General Krulak here:

1.  As has been said many times, I do not do transfers nor do I do transfer windows.  What I do know is that Randy has supported his Manager and I would imagine he would continue to do so.  As we all know, the Winter window is never the most productive...most teams are fighting for position and are not up for selling their good players.  At the same time, GH knows the player scene and availability and will do what he needs to do.

2.  I am not a cricket fan.  Games are too long and too boring.  I am also not a baseball fan for the same reasons.

3.  I watched the Pacific series and thought it was very good.  My father fought in the Pacific during WW II and many of the places mentioned were places he fought at.

4.  I will be at a Board Meeting for the next two days so will be off the site for 48 hours.  I will be back!!

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #123 on: December 05, 2010, 10:58:50 PM »

2.  I am not a cricket fan.  Games are too long and too boring. 


I'm not angry, just disappointed.

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #124 on: December 06, 2010, 10:36:59 AM »
Sir, if I may...

"The Navy Cross is presented to Victor H. Krulak, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps, for extraordinary heroism as Commanding Officer of the Second Battalion, First Marine Parachute Regiment, during operations on Choiseul Island, Solomon Islands, October 28 to November 3, 1943. Assigned the task of diverting hostile attention from the movements of our main attack force en route to Empress Augusta Bay, Bougainville Island, Lieutenant Colonel Krulak landed at Choiseul and daringly directed the attack of his battalion against the Japanese, destroying hundreds of tons of supplies and burning camps and landing barges. Although wounded during the assault on October 30, he repeatedly refused to relinquish his command and with dauntless courage and tenacious devotion to duty, continued to lead his battalion against the numerically superior Japanese forces. His brilliant leadership and indomitable fighting spirit assured the success of this vital mission and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service."

Bravo.
For those who dont know, the Navy Cross is second only to the Medal of Honor.

Apparently none other than the future President John F Kennedy, a PT boat commander at the time, helped withdraw the General's father's unit. The General's father promised him a bottle of Whiskey for the effort and delivered twenty years later when Kennedy was in the White House.
Sounds like something from a movie, yet true.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2010, 10:40:38 AM by Mazrim »

Offline dicedlam

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3415
  • GM : 04.12.2025
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #125 on: December 06, 2010, 12:08:20 PM »
General,
You must have been very proud of your father.
Heroic man indeed.

Offline Chris Jameson

  • Member
  • Posts: 21621
  • DIY guru
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #126 on: December 06, 2010, 02:40:37 PM »
General Krulak here:

2.  I am not a cricket fan.  Games are too long and too boring.

Whereas football is a thrill a minute for the entire 90 minutes.

Offline Salsa Party Animal

  • Member
  • Posts: 2144
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Trinity Road Lower Stand or Dance-floor or Bedroom.
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/Salsapartyanimal
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #127 on: December 06, 2010, 03:09:57 PM »
To me

The navy - Fight on sea with ships / boats / submarine
The Airforce - Fight on air with helicopters  and planes
The army / Marines  - fight on land with weapons.

What the different between Marines and Army ? Why two different department ? Just interested to know. I have no idea.

Offline Fuse

  • Member
  • Posts: 1316
  • GM : 28.08.2015
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #128 on: December 06, 2010, 04:10:23 PM »
Hi General K,

Newcastle United have just sacked their manager and MON has been installed as favourite to takeover. Given he left us in the lurch I imagine that we still hold his contract until next August.

It would be great to think that if he did want this job that we did not allow him to take it given the shit he dropped us in.

Offline The Left Side

  • Member
  • Posts: 8006
  • Location: Somewhere between Brum and Vancouver
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #129 on: December 06, 2010, 04:26:43 PM »
Hi General K,

Newcastle United have just sacked their manager and MON has been installed as favourite to takeover. Given he left us in the lurch I imagine that we still hold his contract until next August.

It would be great to think that if he did want this job that we did not allow him to take it given the shit he dropped us in.

This was just mentioned in the Hughton thread, any chance we could nab Hughton to be our defensive coach, we need clean sheets and he used to be a quality defender?  ;)

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #130 on: December 06, 2010, 04:40:51 PM »
Salsa, just think of Marines as naval infantry. Although modern warfare requires them to be adaptable to all situations.
All Marine forces around the world answer to their Naval heirarchy to a degree and are part of its infrastructure, its just in the case of the US marines, their sheer size requires more comprehensive organisation to become for all intents and purposes, its own branch of the military.

There are probably only a handful of combined national armed forces around the globe that can compare with just the US Marines on their own. Our own General probably commanded something in the region of 300,000 troops at any given time with their own ships, armoured units (light and heavy) and considerable air assets.

Offline Sutton_Villa23

  • Member
  • Posts: 95
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #131 on: December 06, 2010, 08:29:06 PM »
Admit youve made a complete porridge of this and get MON back NOW! we are going down with this manager, do you hear me!! Down, Barnsley away for us next year
and a serious heamoragge of fans unless you pull your finger out

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59501
  • Age: 54
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #132 on: December 06, 2010, 08:31:32 PM »
This is a thread for questions to the General, not emotive statements about our diabolical display at Anfield. There is a match thread for that.

Offline Sutton_Villa23

  • Member
  • Posts: 95
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #133 on: December 06, 2010, 08:41:07 PM »
Ok... General how long is Gerard houllier going to be given before we are staring down the championship barrel as thats where we are heading

Offline villaparkb6

  • Member
  • Posts: 205
  • Location: Tipton
Re: The General C. Krulak Thread XVII
« Reply #134 on: December 06, 2010, 09:38:02 PM »
take this to the board general, 4 premier league wins is terrible and performances like tonight's at anfield are unacceptable....simple as that

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal