Quote from: Pete on November 16, 2010, 04:13:13 PMNot so long ago, Norm in Canada (?) started a thread posing the question - 'what if we sold Ashley Young and used the money to improve the squad'? He was absolutely, and almost unanimously, slated. How quickly things change....True but he was arguably the best left winger in the prem at the time. I think Norm posted that thread around the time of the Everton away game.I don't rate him playing just off the front man tbh, just don't think he creates enough in that position although he did have a very good 15 minute spell there on saturday.I wouldn't be adverse to selling him in Jan for 15m + and getting lennon in a swop or Jarvis.
Not so long ago, Norm in Canada (?) started a thread posing the question - 'what if we sold Ashley Young and used the money to improve the squad'? He was absolutely, and almost unanimously, slated. How quickly things change....
He's not found the form of a couple of years ago, but before you even get into the footballing reasons, selling Ashley Young would send out entirely the wrong message coming after doing the same with Barry and Milner.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on November 17, 2010, 11:00:26 AMHe's not found the form of a couple of years ago, but before you even get into the footballing reasons, selling Ashley Young would send out entirely the wrong message coming after doing the same with Barry and Milner.I dont think anyone would disagree and we would all prefer to see him stay but he needs to commit to the Villa before we lose him for nothing.
When a player delays signing a new contract, it says one thing normally - I'm offski.I hope he stays, but am not too optimistic to be honest, especially after losing Fat Barry and Jimmy.Lennon would make a good replacement.
When a player delays signing a new contract, it says one thing normally - I'm offski.
Quote from: TimTheVillain on November 17, 2010, 10:28:23 AMWhen a player delays signing a new contract, it says one thing normally - I'm offski.Although I'd normally agree with you, it should be noted that this is all happening during a period of change at the club. The manager who bought him has left, there are at least questions over future spending and we're still unsure exactly what the new manager will bring. I don't think it's too far fetched to imagine Ash and his advisors may adopt a 'wait and see' approach in those circumstances.
You've lost me there?You're saying him not signing means he's likely to go (a fear I do share), yet if he wants to move anyway the contract makes no difference? If that's the case why not sign now and take the increased wages until he buggers off in the summer/January?