Quote from: WarszaVillan82 on November 08, 2010, 03:19:32 PMMaking a point about poppies is crass and insensitive. However, displaying a banner against the presence of British troops in Afghanistan and Iraq is not. These people should realise that to get their point accross they should not be making enemies with people who want to remember the war-dead. But those wearing poppies should also take moment and remember the 100s of thousands that our government has killed and maimed in recent years. .. what context does that comment have regrading this point?
Making a point about poppies is crass and insensitive. However, displaying a banner against the presence of British troops in Afghanistan and Iraq is not. These people should realise that to get their point accross they should not be making enemies with people who want to remember the war-dead. But those wearing poppies should also take moment and remember the 100s of thousands that our government has killed and maimed in recent years.
Quote from: Lee on November 08, 2010, 09:50:31 PMQuote from: WarszaVillan82 on November 08, 2010, 03:19:32 PMMaking a point about poppies is crass and insensitive. However, displaying a banner against the presence of British troops in Afghanistan and Iraq is not. These people should realise that to get their point accross they should not be making enemies with people who want to remember the war-dead. But those wearing poppies should also take moment and remember the 100s of thousands that our government has killed and maimed in recent years. .. what context does that comment have regrading this point? I would have thought it was obvious. The majority of the banner is against the wars in afghanistan and Iraq, something that I think is entirely justified and correct. However, using the poppy in this way just divides people and is not justifiable. But as someone else points out if the poppy campaign does not want to be political then it shouldn't have sought sponsorship from BAE - a company that produces weapons that have been responsible for the deaths of innocent people. I am all in favour of remembering those who have died in wars (whatever the wrongs and rights of those wars) but I would not want to help support companies like BAE. But it seems this green brigade were just trying to stir things up - it would have been much better if they'd raised a white poppy for example.
Quote from: cheltenhamlion on November 08, 2010, 01:29:58 PMBunch of c***s. I don't have much more to add really.And they still suggest that Rangers are the bigots and they are the poor, put upon club that gets tarred with teh same brush? Dear me.Rangers are just as much bigots as Celtic fans. They have UFV / UDA supporters clubs going over to Rangers matches from the ShankilL Road and Sandy Road. They also sing about being up to their knees in Fenian blood. Both sets of fans are embarrassing to football. They always have been and always will be.
Bunch of c***s. I don't have much more to add really.And they still suggest that Rangers are the bigots and they are the poor, put upon club that gets tarred with teh same brush? Dear me.
Quote from: Reality on November 09, 2010, 01:00:55 AMQuote from: cheltenhamlion on November 08, 2010, 01:29:58 PMBunch of c***s. I don't have much more to add really.And they still suggest that Rangers are the bigots and they are the poor, put upon club that gets tarred with teh same brush? Dear me.Rangers are just as much bigots as Celtic fans. They have UFV / UDA supporters clubs going over to Rangers matches from the ShankilL Road and Sandy Road. They also sing about being up to their knees in Fenian blood. Both sets of fans are embarrassing to football. They always have been and always will be.You are missing my point. It's all rather pathetic on both sides of the divide but at least Rangers seem to accept their part in this rather than the rank hypocrisy which comes out of Celtic.
What can they do though? They already fine both clubs. Deduct points? They'll still take the league.Do you keep on banning fans? I'd go with that and report them to the local police to deal with. You wouldn't get away with shouting hatred in the streets on a day to day basis so why should a football match be any different?
...Absolutely, most Rangers supporters accept that they have a share of total fuckwits in their support whereas Celtic don't...
Quote from: TheSandman on November 09, 2010, 02:46:32 PM...Absolutely, most Rangers supporters accept that they have a share of total fuckwits in their support whereas Celtic don't...Celtic do. Talkceltic - Shame Green Brigade
At half-time during today's match against Aberdeen we displayed message banners calling for `No bloodstained poppys on our hoops' in protest at the Club's decision to once again wear the poppy on our shirts during next week's game at St Mirren (a match our group will not attend because of this decision). This is in support of an appeal by Poppyscotland to all SPL clubs. Poppyscotland describes its role as `supporting heroes' and state that `the poppy has become a symbol of remembrance and for the sacrifices made by our Armed Forces'. Our group and many within the Celtic support do not recognise the British Armed Forces as heroes, nor their role in many conflicts as one worthy of our remembrance. Earlier this year, the Saville Report on Bloody Sunday confirmed that 14 unarmed civilians were murdered in Derry in 1972 by the Paratroop Regiment. They were among hundreds killed by the British Army during the most recent phase of conflict in Ireland. More recently, the British Armed Forces have murdered and maimed many thousands more innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan. The poppy remembers not just our grandfathers who fought the Nazis but also those who sank the Belgrano and brutally occupied the streets of Belfast and Basra. While we recognise the right of individuals to remember their dead and that many within the Celtic support will wear the poppy in memory of family and friends lost in WW2 and other conflicts, we cannot accept the imposition of the poppy onto our shirts.As far back as April, representatives from the Green Brigade, Celtic Supporters Association and Celtic Trust met with Peter Lawwell to express our united opposition to the Club imposing the poppy on the first team jersey. We also know that the AICSC and many other individual supporters had called on the Club to reverse their position of previous years and take the poppy off the shirt. Following our meeting in April, the Club were contacted on several occasions for further dialogue on the issue but informed us that they were still considering their position and would get back to us. The first any group knew of the decision was after it had been made, and publicly announced. We share the views of the AICSC whose recent statement on the poppy stated that `to see the jersey being used as a medium for such a divisive symbol and the message it communicates is deplorable', and that it showed a complete lack of respect for the support, further highlighted by repeated declarations on the official website of Celtic's delight to be wearing the poppy and supporting Poppyscotland. It appears rather than leave his politics at the door, chairman John Reid, the former Armed Forces Minister and Secretary of State for Northern Ireland and Defence, has forced his onto the first team jersey.