Sometimes you get stands like that at the end no matter what you bowl, and I don't think England bowled that badly. In a few cases they bowled too well if that makes sense, the Aussie tail-enders weren't good enough to get a nick!
Quote from: KevinGage on January 04, 2011, 10:44:43 AMThere was a bit of an opening there to skittle them out for under 200 and build a big first innings lead, possibly not having to bat again if we'd posted 400-450 and got Swann to nail them.As it is, England will have to almost certainly bat last. Not ideal on a wicket that could turn. As well as the soft runs conceded, you'd feel any chance of getting a really big innings lead depended on Trott and KP playing a decent first innings knock. In most Test matches you'd still class this as a good position, but it never pays to let the opposition off the hook when you have them down.Big effort required from Cook, Collingwood and Bell tomorrow. Shouldn't really expect more from Cook. he's played his part throughout the series and then some. Collingwood looked woefully out of knick in Melbourne, when he's poor he's very, very poor. Bell - much as he's improved in the past 12-18 months- is still not someone you'd bet the house on if you're up against it. That said, if he walks to the crease with England about par or better than Australia's 280, he has enough dash to take the game away from them.Not sure of the logic that says because a batsmen is in form we shouldn't expect much from him. Cook and Bell have both played extremely well on this tour and I see no reason to expect that to change. I agree that Collingwood is out of touch but Prior, Bresnan and Swann are all capable of chipping in with useful runs so we're still handily placed.
There was a bit of an opening there to skittle them out for under 200 and build a big first innings lead, possibly not having to bat again if we'd posted 400-450 and got Swann to nail them.As it is, England will have to almost certainly bat last. Not ideal on a wicket that could turn. As well as the soft runs conceded, you'd feel any chance of getting a really big innings lead depended on Trott and KP playing a decent first innings knock. In most Test matches you'd still class this as a good position, but it never pays to let the opposition off the hook when you have them down.Big effort required from Cook, Collingwood and Bell tomorrow. Shouldn't really expect more from Cook. he's played his part throughout the series and then some. Collingwood looked woefully out of knick in Melbourne, when he's poor he's very, very poor. Bell - much as he's improved in the past 12-18 months- is still not someone you'd bet the house on if you're up against it. That said, if he walks to the crease with England about par or better than Australia's 280, he has enough dash to take the game away from them.
Quote from: Dave Cooper on January 04, 2011, 12:47:56 PMSometimes you get stands like that at the end no matter what you bowl, and I don't think England bowled that badly. In a few cases they bowled too well if that makes sense, the Aussie tail-enders weren't good enough to get a nick!Actually they did bowl that badly. They only bowled 3 balls at the stumps to Johnson, one of those was the one that got him out.
Win the series and beat India and we can say we're the best in the world.
Quote from: Rip van Fletcher on January 04, 2011, 06:49:55 PMWin the series and beat India and we can say we're the best in the world.Close. We should beat India in the summer, they won't like our conditions.Still need to beat India in their own back yard and on pitches they have prepared for their batsmen for that I reckon, but we're getting there.