He was with the French national set up so I imagine he's more than qualified. He also took major umbrage with the disgraceful antics of the French players in quite an amusing fashion.
I do too but can't help wondering.. why Sid?All the coaches in the world and Houllier chooses Sid from our Academy. I don' get it.
One criticism of the board is that the entire coaching staff was more loyal to O'Neill than to the club, and when they flounced with Martin we were fucked.There's no chance of that with Sid.
Quote from: Ads on September 20, 2010, 04:48:36 PM He was with the French national set up so I imagine he's more than qualified. He also took major umbrage with the disgraceful antics of the French players in quite an amusing fashion. was he the one who had a flid-out and threw his stopwatch into the hedge? That was my top moment of the World Cup
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:27:38 PMOne criticism of the board is that the entire coaching staff was more loyal to O'Neill than to the club, and when they flounced with Martin we were fucked.There's no chance of that with Sid. Considering that MON, Robertson and Walford have always worked as part of a team, i was'nt in the slightest bit surprised that they all went. It happens a lot.
Quote from: clampy on September 20, 2010, 09:31:30 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:27:38 PMOne criticism of the board is that the entire coaching staff was more loyal to O'Neill than to the club, and when they flounced with Martin we were fucked.There's no chance of that with Sid. Considering that MON, Robertson and Walford have always worked as part of a team, i was'nt in the slightest bit surprised that they all went. It happens a lot.It went beyond those three, and even if it happens a lot, I suspect they want to limit the chances of it happening again
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:35:04 PMQuote from: clampy on September 20, 2010, 09:31:30 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:27:38 PMOne criticism of the board is that the entire coaching staff was more loyal to O'Neill than to the club, and when they flounced with Martin we were fucked.There's no chance of that with Sid. Considering that MON, Robertson and Walford have always worked as part of a team, i was'nt in the slightest bit surprised that they all went. It happens a lot.It went beyond those three, and even if it happens a lot, I suspect they want to limit the chances of it happening again I think they walked out of loyalty for the man who has employed them has he's backroom staff wherever he'smanaged, nothing more than that.
Quote from: Mark Kelly on September 20, 2010, 08:43:55 PMI do too but can't help wondering.. why Sid?All the coaches in the world and Houllier chooses Sid from our Academy. I don' get it.Perhaps Houllier recognised that the players had a really tight bond with Kev Mac and as he wanted to go back to the reserves Sid's appointment makes sense for two reasons.Firstly, with KMac and Sid in the reserves its kind of potentially creating a club within a club. The new regime at the top and 'Villamen' underneath them. The second point is regarding first team players. It seems clear that they were close to Kev Mac. Appointing Sid makes sure that the players will work with the new manager rather than hanker for their man. If there are any whispers, or dissenters, then Sid could be the bridge to the past and the future.
Quote from: clampy on September 20, 2010, 09:39:03 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:35:04 PMQuote from: clampy on September 20, 2010, 09:31:30 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:27:38 PMOne criticism of the board is that the entire coaching staff was more loyal to O'Neill than to the club, and when they flounced with Martin we were fucked.There's no chance of that with Sid. Considering that MON, Robertson and Walford have always worked as part of a team, i was'nt in the slightest bit surprised that they all went. It happens a lot.It went beyond those three, and even if it happens a lot, I suspect they want to limit the chances of it happening again I think they walked out of loyalty for the man who has employed them has he's backroom staff wherever he'smanaged, nothing more than that. That's exactly what I mean.First loyalty to MON, not the club. They won't want that happening again.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:46:23 PMQuote from: clampy on September 20, 2010, 09:39:03 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:35:04 PMQuote from: clampy on September 20, 2010, 09:31:30 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on September 20, 2010, 09:27:38 PMOne criticism of the board is that the entire coaching staff was more loyal to O'Neill than to the club, and when they flounced with Martin we were fucked.There's no chance of that with Sid. Considering that MON, Robertson and Walford have always worked as part of a team, i was'nt in the slightest bit surprised that they all went. It happens a lot.It went beyond those three, and even if it happens a lot, I suspect they want to limit the chances of it happening again I think they walked out of loyalty for the man who has employed them has he's backroom staff wherever he'smanaged, nothing more than that. That's exactly what I mean.First loyalty to MON, not the club. They won't want that happening again. Did Allan Evans also flounce after Brian Little walked.