Author Topic: January Transfer Window - Rumours, Links, Bllsht and Made-Up Nonsense (Read 1625761 times)

avfcpg · « **Reply #3330 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:32:47 PM »

If true then at least he is backing him with funds to a certain extent. Worrying that it's another loan deal...I am starting to wonder if he isn't going to lash out on lump sum investments this month, or could be that he has other players targetted for any kitty, time will tell.

Bridge and Walker would seem to give us a better balance positionally. It's a start, not earth shattering but it's a start...

Mazrim · « **Reply #3331 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:41:13 PM »

Agreed.

Chris Smith · « **Reply #3332 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:45:10 PM »

Quote from: pauliewalnuts on January 06, 2011, 11:18:58 PM

90k a week for Wayne Bridge?

Crikey

Crikey indeed but needs must I suppose.

JUAN PABLO · « **Reply #3333 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:45:11 PM »

I thought we had no money ;-/ thats alot of wage

Greg N'Ash · « **Reply #3334 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:48:00 PM »

wayne bridge? why ffs?

JUAN PABLO · « **Reply #3335 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:50:01 PM »

maybe warnock swap for Samba ;-@

Marlon's Hairy Wood · « **Reply #3336 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:52:15 PM »

Bridge on his day is a fantastic left back

He'll be playing for his future and to secure a move elsewhere

Yeah we're paying high wages, but who gives a f*ck if theres no fee and its until the end of the season

If he contributes to getting us out of the shit then its fantastic

JJ-AV · « **Reply #3337 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:52:49 PM »

90k a week for him is ridiculous, but if we're not paying a loan fee it's fair enough.

He's shite though.

JUAN PABLO · « **Reply #3338 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:53:28 PM »

he will cost us about 1.7 million in wages probably then

Greg N'Ash · « **Reply #3339 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:54:02 PM »

well if we're going to give bridge 90k a week, maybe we should have given Milner 100k in the summer and kept him. i know who'd i'd rather have.

Dave · « **Reply #3340 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:54:12 PM »

Quote from: Marlon's Hairy Wood on January 06, 2011, 11:52:15 PM

Yeah we're paying high wages, but who gives a f*ck if theres no fee and its until the end of the season

I would if he's messing up our defence as he undoubtedly would.

He would be no improvement on Warnock. The bad Warnock.

JJ-AV · « **Reply #3341 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:55:14 PM »

He's better than Warnock IMO.

But that aint saying much.

Marlon's Hairy Wood · « **Reply #3342 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:55:48 PM »

Quote from: Dave on January 06, 2011, 11:30:14 PM

Bridge wouldn't really be any improvement on Warnock at all. Neither has any positional sense and seems to have much of a brain anymore.

Bridge at over twice the wages of Warnock? It's definitely a no from me.

IMO I think you'd have a point if we were watching the Warnock who played for Blackburn

But the Warnock whos been on the pitch this season, compared to Bridge who will be playing to either earn a move here or somewhere better, theres no comparison for me

Greg N'Ash · « **Reply #3343 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:57:20 PM »

he was shit at chelsea and done nowt at Citeh. He's worth probably half those wages at most and wouldn't get them anywhere else. Paying top wages for average players - isn't that where we started the season?

ozzjim · « **Reply #3344 on:** January 06, 2011, 11:58:17 PM »

Depends which bridge though Dave. Playing with a point to prove I can't believe he won't be better than warnock. Warnock for samba would be a good move too.

News:

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Follow us on...