Quote from: Phil from the upper holte on November 22, 2010, 06:46:37 PMQuote from: brontebilly on November 22, 2010, 03:00:15 AMMr. Krulak, Question - though it has possibly been asked before.Who approved the signing of Stephen Ireland? MON may have supported the Milner/Ireland deal but it was completed after he left. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but buying players without having a manager on board is stupid in the extreme. Its General not MRIt has been explained before as wellThe US Army doesnt have any authority over me anyway. Mr Krulak is a board member who gives of his time to answer fans on a forum fair enough. I applaud him for that but I'm not going to genuflect before a general in the US army at the same time.
Quote from: brontebilly on November 22, 2010, 03:00:15 AMMr. Krulak, Question - though it has possibly been asked before.Who approved the signing of Stephen Ireland? MON may have supported the Milner/Ireland deal but it was completed after he left. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but buying players without having a manager on board is stupid in the extreme. Its General not MRIt has been explained before as well
Mr. Krulak, Question - though it has possibly been asked before.Who approved the signing of Stephen Ireland? MON may have supported the Milner/Ireland deal but it was completed after he left. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but buying players without having a manager on board is stupid in the extreme.
Quote from: brontebilly on November 24, 2010, 09:07:38 PMQuote from: Phil from the upper holte on November 22, 2010, 06:46:37 PMQuote from: brontebilly on November 22, 2010, 03:00:15 AMMr. Krulak, Question - though it has possibly been asked before.Who approved the signing of Stephen Ireland? MON may have supported the Milner/Ireland deal but it was completed after he left. Hindsight is a wonderful thing but buying players without having a manager on board is stupid in the extreme. Its General not MRIt has been explained before as wellThe US Army doesnt have any authority over me anyway. Mr Krulak is a board member who gives of his time to answer fans on a forum fair enough. I applaud him for that but I'm not going to genuflect before a general in the US army at the same time. If you're going to insult someone, at least get your facts right. It's Marines, not army.
brontebilly,"It is a side issue but I for one am not overly impressed by a career in a force that had caused global instability for many years."It is quite possible that this is the most asinine statement that I have seen on this forum, and I have seen some doozies.How many times must the Ireland deal be explained to you? It is not that difficult. MON and MCFC had a deal signed and sealed. It was done. Finished. Finito. MON, of course, was speaking for more than himself but, in fact, was speaking for AVFC. When MON left, this did not mean that the deal BETWEEN AVFC AND MCFC was null and void. A deal is a deal. Now, MCFC and Ireland had to hammer out contract/pay issues, but that had nothing to do with the deal in place. The deal had already been finalized and there was no way out of it. Is this so difficult to understand?
. Some of you guys seem overjoyed to have your stomach tickled by board members. A bit of debate about the future of the club wouldn't go astray at times.
General Krulak here:1. brontebilly: All I have ever asked is that Fans treat each other and those on this thread with respect and with dignity. "General or Mr." is not something that I get exercised about but...to denigrate service...whether in uniform as a US Marine or any other Nation's military...seems to go a step too far. Like the British soldiers fighting and sacrificing in Afghanistan, they are doing what their Nation asked them to do...you may not agree with the policy or for US policy...but don't denigrate the service. As for your question, Pelty pretty much hit the nail on the head which is the same answer (basically) that I provided on more that 3 occasions. The deal was completed while MON was the Manager...simple as that. Signed and sealed.
While I don't have a problem with referring to CK as General-I would never call someone 'My Lord' or 'Your Majesty' as I could not be persuaded to either. I would also support anyone's right to state they hold no regard for someone who has served his country in military service. They do not ask for our approval as individuals and cannot expect it automatically.