I had one of the best days today I have ever had, Villa won superbly, Tamworth won and are top of the league, the company in The Bartons was top notch, I got soaked but enjoyed my first time selling fanzines.
Quote from: Dave Cooper on August 14, 2010, 11:57:38 PMI had one of the best days today I have ever had, Villa won superbly, Tamworth won and are top of the league, the company in The Bartons was top notch, I got soaked but enjoyed my first time selling fanzines. Were you selling over the road from Dave Woodhall? That was where I bought my copy, and thought I hadn't seen the seller before.
Quote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on August 15, 2010, 05:32:13 PMQuote from: EffDee on August 15, 2010, 03:50:27 PMQuote from: villajk on August 14, 2010, 11:44:39 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on August 14, 2010, 11:32:51 PMI actually thought that, other than the chances he missed, Carew did pretty well. Put himself about, and caused a lot of trouble for them.Carew worked hard throughout the game. He missed some chances but another time at least one of those will result in a goal.Y'see, I thought he was poor; not for the missed cahnces and the poor first touch in his one-on-one in the first half. No, the reason is that when you've got a player like MA who whips the ball in from the wing the front man has to be there. Unfortunately, Big John - more often than not - was ambling into the penalty area rather than actually in the 6 yard box. He's actually not the player we need with Downing and MA out wide; we need a Gabby or Delfouneso who will anticipate and have the pace to get there.Sorry to be critical, just my view.You're view is wrong. Carew played very well. Held the ball up very well and had to deal with a lot of crap from the ref giving fouls against him for simply being stronger than his opponent. You moan he's not in the box, but he's usually had a part to play in the build up if he's not in the box. Not everyone can be as quick as a lot of the players we have. When he was not involved in the build up, he was in the box, hence he could (and should) have scored a couple of goals from being in the box.How you can say he was poor is beyond me. You must've been watching a totally different game.Maybe a bit harsh but there was one moment that summed up what you're saying about the shit he gets. Carew running down the right with Upson, they go shoulder to shoulder and carew wins it easily, so Upson just held onto his arm. After a couple of seconds hte linesman gave the free kick to Upson. I absolutely couldn't believe it, truly shocking decision. Another good example was when John hit the post in the second half, he was being pulled all over the place but you can guarantee there was never any chance of him getting the pen that he should've because he just used his strength and won the challenge despite being fouled.
Quote from: EffDee on August 15, 2010, 03:50:27 PMQuote from: villajk on August 14, 2010, 11:44:39 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on August 14, 2010, 11:32:51 PMI actually thought that, other than the chances he missed, Carew did pretty well. Put himself about, and caused a lot of trouble for them.Carew worked hard throughout the game. He missed some chances but another time at least one of those will result in a goal.Y'see, I thought he was poor; not for the missed cahnces and the poor first touch in his one-on-one in the first half. No, the reason is that when you've got a player like MA who whips the ball in from the wing the front man has to be there. Unfortunately, Big John - more often than not - was ambling into the penalty area rather than actually in the 6 yard box. He's actually not the player we need with Downing and MA out wide; we need a Gabby or Delfouneso who will anticipate and have the pace to get there.Sorry to be critical, just my view.You're view is wrong. Carew played very well. Held the ball up very well and had to deal with a lot of crap from the ref giving fouls against him for simply being stronger than his opponent. You moan he's not in the box, but he's usually had a part to play in the build up if he's not in the box. Not everyone can be as quick as a lot of the players we have. When he was not involved in the build up, he was in the box, hence he could (and should) have scored a couple of goals from being in the box.How you can say he was poor is beyond me. You must've been watching a totally different game.
Quote from: villajk on August 14, 2010, 11:44:39 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on August 14, 2010, 11:32:51 PMI actually thought that, other than the chances he missed, Carew did pretty well. Put himself about, and caused a lot of trouble for them.Carew worked hard throughout the game. He missed some chances but another time at least one of those will result in a goal.Y'see, I thought he was poor; not for the missed cahnces and the poor first touch in his one-on-one in the first half. No, the reason is that when you've got a player like MA who whips the ball in from the wing the front man has to be there. Unfortunately, Big John - more often than not - was ambling into the penalty area rather than actually in the 6 yard box. He's actually not the player we need with Downing and MA out wide; we need a Gabby or Delfouneso who will anticipate and have the pace to get there.Sorry to be critical, just my view.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on August 14, 2010, 11:32:51 PMI actually thought that, other than the chances he missed, Carew did pretty well. Put himself about, and caused a lot of trouble for them.Carew worked hard throughout the game. He missed some chances but another time at least one of those will result in a goal.
I actually thought that, other than the chances he missed, Carew did pretty well. Put himself about, and caused a lot of trouble for them.
You must be proud of MA Dave, being a Tamworth lad ;-)
Quote from: paul_e on August 15, 2010, 05:37:48 PMQuote from: Can Carew Be Bothered!?!? on August 15, 2010, 05:32:13 PMQuote from: EffDee on August 15, 2010, 03:50:27 PMQuote from: villajk on August 14, 2010, 11:44:39 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on August 14, 2010, 11:32:51 PMI actually thought that, other than the chances he missed, Carew did pretty well. Put himself about, and caused a lot of trouble for them.Carew worked hard throughout the game. He missed some chances but another time at least one of those will result in a goal.Y'see, I thought he was poor; not for the missed cahnces and the poor first touch in his one-on-one in the first half. No, the reason is that when you've got a player like MA who whips the ball in from the wing the front man has to be there. Unfortunately, Big John - more often than not - was ambling into the penalty area rather than actually in the 6 yard box. He's actually not the player we need with Downing and MA out wide; we need a Gabby or Delfouneso who will anticipate and have the pace to get there.Sorry to be critical, just my view.You're view is wrong. Carew played very well. Held the ball up very well and had to deal with a lot of crap from the ref giving fouls against him for simply being stronger than his opponent. You moan he's not in the box, but he's usually had a part to play in the build up if he's not in the box. Not everyone can be as quick as a lot of the players we have. When he was not involved in the build up, he was in the box, hence he could (and should) have scored a couple of goals from being in the box.How you can say he was poor is beyond me. You must've been watching a totally different game.Maybe a bit harsh but there was one moment that summed up what you're saying about the shit he gets. Carew running down the right with Upson, they go shoulder to shoulder and carew wins it easily, so Upson just held onto his arm. After a couple of seconds hte linesman gave the free kick to Upson. I absolutely couldn't believe it, truly shocking decision. Another good example was when John hit the post in the second half, he was being pulled all over the place but you can guarantee there was never any chance of him getting the pen that he should've because he just used his strength and won the challenge despite being fouled.All of the above is correct...........but the main fact is that JC, yesterday, was playing as our main striker. He had 3 clear cut chances and failed each time.If he is to continue as the main striker then he must convert those chances or else be replaced by someone who does.
My initial comment wasn't so much intended as criticism of Carew, but to highlight the difference in attitude towards him and Heskey from a number of fans. Everything Carew is being praised for is what Heskey does. Does anyone believe Heskey would be receiving the same praise, even if we had won 8-0?However, had Heskey muffed that 1 on 1 so spectacularly, or missed those headers, he would have been absolutely slaughtered. Can you imagine the reaction if he'd missed that unmarked header? There were even a few digs at the fella and he didn't even play yesterday.Equality, it's a nice thing sometimes.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on August 15, 2010, 10:02:43 PMMy initial comment wasn't so much intended as criticism of Carew, but to highlight the difference in attitude towards him and Heskey from a number of fans. Everything Carew is being praised for is what Heskey does. Does anyone believe Heskey would be receiving the same praise, even if we had won 8-0?However, had Heskey muffed that 1 on 1 so spectacularly, or missed those headers, he would have been absolutely slaughtered. Can you imagine the reaction if he'd missed that unmarked header? There were even a few digs at the fella and he didn't even play yesterday.Equality, it's a nice thing sometimes.Why not compare Heskeys scoring rate for us with Carews.
So no equality for 2 Villa players then is the consensus. Nice.