collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by FatSam
[Today at 09:47:59 AM]


Re: Matty Cash by brontebilly
[Today at 09:44:25 AM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 09:42:58 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Dave
[Today at 09:42:34 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by john e
[Today at 09:26:29 AM]


Re: Matty Cash by Rigadon
[Today at 09:23:52 AM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Mister E
[Today at 09:08:17 AM]


Re: Matty Cash by Olof's Beard
[Today at 09:01:31 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Martin O'Neill thread (with added sacking #2188)  (Read 352041 times)

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35573
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1470 on: December 09, 2012, 12:17:17 AM »
I thin MON  was great when he came to the club, but have to say as a fan he left the club in a bad state, but dont think it was just his fault. Chief exec and chairman should have taken hold
Agree - it was like Ron Atkinson all over again. He made us relevant again. He made the same mistakes as BFR by playing his favourites and not utilising all the talent at his disposal. His football wasn't as good but we were a little more consistent.
Unlike BFR he did not win a cup against a brilliant ManU team by outwitting the old miserable one.

He doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same paragraph as Ron.

Offline kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 28077
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1471 on: December 09, 2012, 12:28:13 AM »

Villa under Big Ron.


Villa under MO'N

Admittedly slightly disingenuous.

Offline Nelly

  • Member
  • Posts: 4407
  • Location: Birmingham
    • rahix.music
  • GM : 01.05.2023
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1472 on: December 09, 2012, 02:31:44 AM »
That goal in the clip of Big Ron's Villa is amazing. Thanks for that.

Offline Matt C

  • Member
  • Posts: 6228
  • Location: Southern California
  • GM : 18.06.2020
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1473 on: December 09, 2012, 03:34:49 AM »
What a fine team goal that first Yorke one is. I was right in the front of the Holte, remember it like yesterday.

Offline Phil from the upper holte

  • Member
  • Posts: 10142
  • Location: B62
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1474 on: December 09, 2012, 04:36:37 AM »
I think Mon is a legend he's keeping us out the bottom 3

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1475 on: December 09, 2012, 07:57:45 AM »
I think the curtain may well come down on his managerial reign If Sunderland lose to reading on Tuesday .

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10092
  • Location: Peckham
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1476 on: December 09, 2012, 08:24:49 AM »
He has no self doubt.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1477 on: December 09, 2012, 08:26:57 AM »
He has no self doubt.
That really was an uncomfortable interview, he didn't handle that question well at all.

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11564
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1478 on: December 09, 2012, 08:32:08 AM »
Watch from 2.15 onwards.
First he has a a hearing problem, then he answers a question with a question, then his face contorts and his eyes squint as he goes on about having been in the game a long time. I think Martin has turned into a grumpy old man.


[/youtube]


Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10092
  • Location: Peckham
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1479 on: December 09, 2012, 08:38:40 AM »
The moron. :)

Offline Big Dick Edwards

  • Member
  • Posts: 3163
  • Location: Where the streets have no name..
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1480 on: December 09, 2012, 09:32:43 AM »
Ha!Ha! O'Neill was really taken aback by that question. What an arrogant prick!
It would be delicious karma if we escaped relegation at Sunderland's/O'Neill's expense.

Offline JJ-AV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9466
  • GM : 26.07.2022
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1481 on: December 09, 2012, 09:52:19 AM »
He's gone if they lose Tuesday. I think he needs four points from Reading and Southampton at home to stay in his job for the January window.

I think he'll get them and turn it around, have them stay up and leave at the end of the season. I hope not though.

Offline rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 9662
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1482 on: December 09, 2012, 10:05:02 AM »
He's gone if they lose Tuesday. I think he needs four points from Reading and Southampton at home to stay in his job for the January window.

I think he'll get them and turn it around, have them stay up and leave at the end of the season. I hope not though.

That would be my punt too.

Obviously if it transpired it will be spun by his media buddies as single handedly preventing Sunderland from becoming the next Leeds/Sheff Wed/Forest etc...

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1483 on: December 09, 2012, 10:06:15 AM »
I think the term is "being found out". He'll be midweek wrestling with players next you watch.

Offline maidstonevillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4954
  • GM : 26.11.2024
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1484 on: December 09, 2012, 10:16:25 AM »
I think comparisons with the way Lambert spent are going to make O'Neill look very poor in the long run. I doubt Sunderland will make a profit from their summer dealings, they paid top whack. I reckon we would at least double what we laid out this summer on out signings, maybe more.

Benteke £15m
Westwood £10m
Lowton £10m
Vlaar £7m
Guzan £6m (although you could still count him as a MON signing)

The above values would seem reasonable to me. The other signings may yet come good, and we are unlikely to make a loss on any of them with the possible exception of a small loss on KEA if his form doen't improve.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal