collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Brentford vs Aston Villa Match Thread by ChicagoLion
[Today at 03:05:05 PM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 02:59:11 PM]


Kits 25/26 by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 02:54:29 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Villa Lew
[Today at 02:35:16 PM]


Unai Emery by Ads
[Today at 02:28:12 PM]


Matty Cash by brontebilly
[Today at 02:27:12 PM]


Leon Bailey (out on loan to AS Roma) by MillerBall
[Today at 02:25:37 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by KevinGage
[Today at 02:11:55 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Martin O'Neill thread (with added sacking #2188)  (Read 352463 times)

Offline not3bad

  • Member
  • Posts: 12218
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 15.06.2022
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1020 on: December 03, 2012, 01:40:49 PM »
You can't keep spending more than your income and you can't rely on the benevolence of your owner forever. And to correct the above oft-repeated error - Faulkner arrived with Randy.

That is the mantra but Villa are a club which has a turnover of £100m and television income is about to rise by 60% (2014), so how come they can only sign Football League players these days.

And in the end we have to decide whether Villa's financial position was so uniquely terrible that the club needed to take a huge gamble with relegation to put it right.

If the answer is yes, then those responsible cannot be given the fig-leaf of being called naive, they have to be considered criminally culpable.
They don't though, do they?

Thanks for that reminder that any reasoned argument can be avoided with a quibble.


It's not just a quibble though is it?  You talk about "orthodox opinions" that are wrong, and then spout a cliche that Aston Villa only sign football league players nowadays which is patently untrue.  Also, didn't Villa take on an international scout this summer?  He's hardly going to be scouting at Aldershot is he?

Offline regular_john

  • Member
  • Posts: 368
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1021 on: December 03, 2012, 01:41:47 PM »
and signing like Ashley Young from the football league are fine and that was not *these days*

Watford were in the prem when we signed him

Offline glasses

  • Member
  • Posts: 2546
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1022 on: December 03, 2012, 01:42:18 PM »
I looked in on the main Sunderland forum this morning, and they seemed to have convinced themselves that the problem is that whilst Walford when there with MON, John Robertson chose to retire.


f

Clutching at straws, robbo was no Peter Taylor and mon is definitely no cloughie!
I think so too. Although we wondered something similar when Houllier went through a string of bad results, with Phil Thompson's influence being discussed.

Offline Rip Van We Go Again

  • Member
  • Posts: 26039
  • Location: Up and down, i'm up the wall, i'm up the bloody tree
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1023 on: December 03, 2012, 01:45:18 PM »
But truly, setting aside all pedantry, one really can't help but feel, after considered observation, that Villa's squad seems rather replete with the sort of cheap players, whose potential one can't help having doubts about.
Are you the Duke of Kent?

Offline not3bad

  • Member
  • Posts: 12218
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 15.06.2022
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1024 on: December 03, 2012, 01:47:06 PM »
You can't argue with the vocab.  It's amazeballs.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1025 on: December 03, 2012, 01:48:43 PM »
You can't argue with the vocab.  It's amazeballs.

It's scintillating , absorbing and extraordinary!

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11564
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1026 on: December 03, 2012, 01:54:04 PM »
Quote
one really can't help but feel, after considered observation, that Villa's squad seems rather replete with the sort of cheap players, whose potential one can't help having doubts about

Can you do double entendres too ? You could be the next voice on adverts for Crabbies Ginger Beer.

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1027 on: December 03, 2012, 01:55:36 PM »
Using words that haven't been spake since Victorian times can't hide the fact one is speaking directly through ones mudwhistle.

Believe me, I've tried.
Ruthless, this lot.

Offline Villadroid

  • Member
  • Posts: 648
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1028 on: December 03, 2012, 02:02:33 PM »
You can't argue with the vocab.  It's amazeballs.

It's scintillating , absorbing and extraordinary!

A contributor called Villadroid
Found himself slightly annoyed
Mocked with derision
At his lack of concision
He mockingly snootily reploid


Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1029 on: December 03, 2012, 02:05:48 PM »
I think his thesaurus is terrible.  And terrible.

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1030 on: December 03, 2012, 02:09:04 PM »
You can't argue with the vocab.  It's amazeballs.

It's scintillating , absorbing and extraordinary!

A contributor called Villadroid
Found himself slightly annoyed
Mocked with derision
At his lack of concision
He mockingly snootily reploid



Very entertaining !
Are you our new Xmas present?

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1031 on: December 03, 2012, 02:10:41 PM »
A villadroid argued with zeal.
And used flowery speech to conceal
That its really MONs fault.
That there's naught in the vault.
And his shabbiness now is revealed.


Step to me punk and you're gonna get served.

Offline Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air

  • Member
  • Posts: 11564
  • Location: Upton Park....No, Olympic Stadium....No, Aston Park...Yes that's it,Turf Moor.
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1032 on: December 03, 2012, 02:11:41 PM »
You can't argue with the vocab.  It's amazeballs.

It's scintillating , absorbing and extraordinary!

A contributor called Villadroid
Found himself slightly annoyed
Mocked with derision
At his lack of concision
He mockingly snootily reploid



Are you John Betjeman ?

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1033 on: December 03, 2012, 02:11:50 PM »
A villadroid argued with zeal.
And used flowery speech to conceal
That its really MONs fault.
That there's naught in the vault.
And his shabbiness now is revealed.


Step to me punk and you're gonna get served.

Poetry in motion maz!

Offline eastie

  • Member
  • Posts: 19940
  • Age: 60
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1034 on: December 03, 2012, 02:12:33 PM »
You can't argue with the vocab.  It's amazeballs.

It's scintillating , absorbing and extraordinary!

A contributor called Villadroid
Found himself slightly annoyed
Mocked with derision
At his lack of concision
He mockingly snootily reploid



Are you John Betjeman ?

Pam ayres?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal