Quote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:19:27 AMQuote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:13:29 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.He has. You're wrong on the first point so that would make you also wrong on your second point.Have you any stats or data to back that assertion up? I'm sure I recall looking through the y/e accounts for the last 3 year's and they showed that whilst revenue increased that was predominantly down to TV revenue?
Quote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:13:29 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.He has. You're wrong on the first point so that would make you also wrong on your second point.
Quote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.
I don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.
2011 FXPro were sponsors.
Quote from: bertlambshank on January 25, 2013, 11:01:08 AM2011 FXPro were sponsors.2011 the 2010 accounts were made public.
Quote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:36:31 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:19:27 AMQuote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:13:29 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.He has. You're wrong on the first point so that would make you also wrong on your second point.Have you any stats or data to back that assertion up? I'm sure I recall looking through the y/e accounts for the last 3 year's and they showed that whilst revenue increased that was predominantly down to TV revenue? he last accounts show a 22% increase in 2011 compared to theprevious 12 months, not bad for such tough economic times and without a paying ote]So we're relying on data that's 2 years out of date on how he's performing now. If the next set of data shows commercial income to have increased against a backdrop of McLeish AMD Lambert then hats off to the fella but I'm fully expecting to see turnover flatlining or possibly dropping. The fabled £100 million barrier to meet his stated objective of top 20 in Delloites list seems a distant if not unrealistic dream at the moment.
The trouble is there is pretty much nobody else involved on the board as well. He is wet behind the ears kid who is woefully out of his depth running us.
Quote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:57:08 AMQuote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:36:31 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:19:27 AMQuote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:13:29 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.He has. You're wrong on the first point so that would make you also wrong on your second point.Have you any stats or data to back that assertion up? I'm sure I recall looking through the y/e accounts for the last 3 year's and they showed that whilst revenue increased that was predominantly down to TV revenue? he last accounts show a 22% increase in 2011 compared to theprevious 12 months, not bad for such tough economic times and without a paying ote]So we're relying on data that's 2 years out of date on how he's performing now. If the next set of data shows commercial income to have increased against a backdrop of McLeish AMD Lambert then hats off to the fella but I'm fully expecting to see turnover flatlining or possibly dropping. The fabled £100 million barrier to meet his stated objective of top 20 in Delloites list seems a distant if not unrealistic dream at the moment.
Quote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:36:31 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:19:27 AMQuote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:13:29 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.He has. You're wrong on the first point so that would make you also wrong on your second point.Have you any stats or data to back that assertion up? I'm sure I recall looking through the y/e accounts for the last 3 year's and they showed that whilst revenue increased that was predominantly down to TV revenue? he last accounts show a 22% increase in 2011 compared to theprevious 12 months, not bad for such tough economic times and without a paying ote]
If the day ends with only one signing, I'm expecting Paul Faulkner to resign. Not because of what he's done but what he's failed to do, that being to convince Randy Lerner that we needed additional funds to stay up. Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming Faulkner, he has no control over the finances, it's a very awkward position for any CEO to find themselves, it's not as if he can go out there and find new investors into the club or arrange financing through the banks. The man's hands have been tied behind his back and if has any self pride he'd resign and walk away from what is turning out to be a bloody circus.
The last accounts show a 22% increase in 2011 compared to the previous 12 months, not bad for such tough economic times and without a paying sponsor.
Majority of Player recruitment under PF has been disaster ,why he is still in charge of this is crazy.Randy could of saved Millions and made millions with a good scouting a player recruitment strategy