Quote from: Greg N'Ash on January 24, 2013, 08:03:50 PMThink he's a bean counter personally. Certainly not the normal type of CE you see at a club, more the type you get when the recievers appoint an administrator. Bottom line is the finances, and it reflects in the woeful PR and their managerial choices. I've said before this reliance on youth thing is his idea and i've not changed my mind.The only education we know of is he read history at university. I don't think he was an accountant at MBNA.
Think he's a bean counter personally. Certainly not the normal type of CE you see at a club, more the type you get when the recievers appoint an administrator. Bottom line is the finances, and it reflects in the woeful PR and their managerial choices. I've said before this reliance on youth thing is his idea and i've not changed my mind.
Can we find him a joj as a inglish teacherlooking at his dad's profile I think he using artisitc licence Luton were never in the Prenier League nor the Top League in the mid 1990s
I don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.
Quote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.
Quote from: AV82EC on January 25, 2013, 10:13:29 AMQuote from: Rudy Lambert on January 25, 2013, 10:09:46 AMI don't blame him. He doesn't make the big decisions, Randy does.Faulkner has done a good job increasing commercial revenue and the daily running of the club back office. That afterall is his remit.He can now add to that 'Lerner's scapegoat'.Has he increased commercial revenue though? I'd suggest any increases in club revenue in the last 3 season's would be down to TV revenue pure and simple. The man has been an unmitigated disaster in my view.He has. You're wrong on the first point so that would make you also wrong on your second point.
If he is so good commercially, you'd think he'd make it very clear to Lerner that missing out on the Premier League next year will be a financial disaster.