Of course, the timing of MON's departure has left us in the lurch. But several people on here were arguing for MON to leave for ages, and even touting the name of Jose Mourinho amongst a number of candidates.I'm not seeing much by the way of preferred candidates from those people now. Bit harder than you thought I reckon!
All Mcdonald's comments and body language suggest someone who is really not convinced he is up to the job or in his heart that he really wants it.I just think it would be a big big mistake and we will undo the good work and progress O'neill, for all his faults, has brought us. Give it to Eriksson and review at the end of the season. He has a good record overall and certainly in the short term, will help to maintain stability and a decent profile in the media rather than slipping into obscurity as others have said.
I have really immense misgivings about K Mac getting the job full time. Everything he does and says seems to scream of a man who is thoroughly uncomfortable with the position he's in right now, and Sunday seemed to be as much mental fatigue on his part as inadequacy from the players. I have no evidence or anything, but might he be too close to the players? Kind of the opposite of MON, I know, but there is such a thing as too close for a manager. For a coach, being close to the players can be a really useful and good thing, but for a manager it's a problem.Don't get me wrong, he's an immense coach, has to be a big influence in the new set-up, whoever is the manager. But to be actual manager full-time? I would worry.
Petrov was calling for K Mac to be made manager after the West Ham game because he is popular with the players - that's a bad sign as far as I'm concerned as they will think that he'll be a soft touch. If he gets the top job and fails, we'll lose him from the Club which would be a real loss.
I'm afraid I'm beginning to see the signs of a very long, and not particularly inspiring, season.
...and as I invested in season tickets with some optimism in the Summer.