I would be apoplectic if we got Bob Bradley in. That would be the nail in the coffin for me as to whether to go next season to be honest.I was no MON fan, but to go for such an inexperienced replacement would be going an awfully long way backwards to my mind.
Quote from: peter w on August 23, 2010, 03:04:11 PMAnd what if Bradley were appointed, much to the annoyance and derision of most, and he wasn't completely useless? maybe we should just wait and see before we start trying to burn randy's effigy for daring to bring shit into the club. Not that I think Bradley is that bad a call as I've mentioned elsewhere. Just because he's American doesn't mean he cannot amke a success of it.peter I was saying the same thing on the General's thread. I don't know enough about Bradley to make a solid call. But having said that I'm really surprised that so many people have such strong opinions on him with very little knowledge. From the little I know, he's taken an above average nation in the US and beaten Spain and nearly Brazil with tactics. Something our much more distibguished manager didn't come close to doing with supposedly much better players.Also, I don't know if he has an eye for talent or not. But I bet people would have had the same issue with say Steve Bruce or Mark Hughes and they have both introduced excellent players to the PL from arounf the world with very little transfer knowledge. Bradley may lack immediate knowledge of the European market but I would guess he has a much better understanding of Central and South America than most. Also, most US players who have played in the PL have done very well, and if he was able to entice his son and say Landon Donovan, it would be very good business.I'm open to the idea and would give him a chance while not overwhelmed by the thought of it.
And what if Bradley were appointed, much to the annoyance and derision of most, and he wasn't completely useless? maybe we should just wait and see before we start trying to burn randy's effigy for daring to bring shit into the club. Not that I think Bradley is that bad a call as I've mentioned elsewhere. Just because he's American doesn't mean he cannot amke a success of it.
If it is Bradley, are we prepared to write off this season as one of experiment, and if it hasn't worked by next May say, "Okay, the gamble failed, let's go back to the tried and tested?" Or will we just moan and complain that Randy's gone for the cheap option and is more interested in cutting his losses/cracking the American market?
I have had it from a very unreliable source that Kevin MacDonald has got the job until the end of the season.
In short, there are no sound footballing reasons why Bob Bradley should get the job. Even more than that, it's difficult to make out any compelling reasons why he should even be considered.
Quote from: dave clark five on August 23, 2010, 03:34:44 PMI have had it from a very unreliable source that Kevin MacDonald has got the job until the end of the season.I read that as "reliable". Very worrying.
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on August 23, 2010, 04:28:44 PMIn short, there are no sound footballing reasons why Bob Bradley should get the job. Even more than that, it's difficult to make out any compelling reasons why he should even be considered.If you took out the fact he's American - imagine he was the manager of Slovenia or Australia, for example - would be even be under consideration? No.It'd make us a laughing stock, and would also make it look like we were being used as a training course for American coaches.