I've moved on from being one of the "Well who is better?" crowd to "Who would Randy realistically have got that would have been worse?"I've got a fucking migraine and I'm utterly pissed off with the Milner bollocks, the Warnock bullshit, the Young crap, the lack of signings, the lack of plan B, the lack of any tactical nouse, the lack of creativity, the lack of anything resembling football from this century, the lack of anyone with a fancy European or South American name, the enormity of the money that ingrate footballers get paid......
Quote from: "sfx412" Who played him first in midfield, for England, not O'Neill.I've been thinking about this for ages, can you tell me the answer please? Are you saying James Milner hadn't played in midfield until he was chosen there for England?
Who played him first in midfield, for England, not O'Neill.
Occasionally for Newcastle, sure.U21s? Don't recall that myself.But anyway, I'll play and say yes: James Milner was an established central midfield player when we bought him from Newcastle and a nailed-on certainty to play for England at the 2010 World Cup. Martin O'Neill only used him last season as was blindingly obvious. Come to think of it, O'Neill was a fool - a fool! - for wasting a year of Milner's career by playing him right wing/midfield in his first season at Villa when EVERYONE else knew his best position was in the centre.
There are bigger clubs than Villa but none better and Man City are neither, just richer.
Quote from: "Mark Fletcher"Quote from: "John M"I find that on here peoples views of his strengths and weaknesses aren't all that different, just a matter of how much importance you place on themI find a huge amount of importance on the fact that he's invested nigh on £16m on Emile Heskey.That decision alone is unforgiveable.£3.5m fee plus a (reported) £60k a week for the 1.5 years he's been here = £8.18m. Whatever it is it's not well spent, but's lets at least try and keep the figures right.
Quote from: "John M"I find that on here peoples views of his strengths and weaknesses aren't all that different, just a matter of how much importance you place on themI find a huge amount of importance on the fact that he's invested nigh on £16m on Emile Heskey.That decision alone is unforgiveable.
I find that on here peoples views of his strengths and weaknesses aren't all that different, just a matter of how much importance you place on them
Whatever way you look at it though Emile has been a condom on the prick of progress.