How the fuck has Suarez been credited with that goal?
Quote from: luke25 on February 02, 2011, 11:09:43 PMHow the fuck has Suarez been credited with that goal?Probably because the media fall over themselves to love the red scouse and king kenny!
Quote from: The Left Side on February 02, 2011, 11:28:51 PMQuote from: luke25 on February 02, 2011, 11:09:43 PMHow the fuck has Suarez been credited with that goal?Probably because the media fall over themselves to love the red scouse and king kenny!And not because it was er...actually Suarez's goal?
Quote from: Dave on February 02, 2011, 11:31:31 PMQuote from: The Left Side on February 02, 2011, 11:28:51 PMQuote from: luke25 on February 02, 2011, 11:09:43 PMHow the fuck has Suarez been credited with that goal?Probably because the media fall over themselves to love the red scouse and king kenny!And not because it was er...actually Suarez's goal?Really?
Quote from: luke25 on February 02, 2011, 11:46:23 PMQuote from: Dave on February 02, 2011, 11:31:31 PMQuote from: The Left Side on February 02, 2011, 11:28:51 PMQuote from: luke25 on February 02, 2011, 11:09:43 PMHow the fuck has Suarez been credited with that goal?Probably because the media fall over themselves to love the red scouse and king kenny!And not because it was er...actually Suarez's goal?Really? Yes. As per my previous post.If it's going in should the defender not be there then it's the striker's goal.If the defender intervenes to turn a shot that's NOT going in into a goal then it's an own-goal. So yes, of course it's Suarez's goal.
Quote from: Dave on February 02, 2011, 11:51:27 PMQuote from: luke25 on February 02, 2011, 11:46:23 PMQuote from: Dave on February 02, 2011, 11:31:31 PMQuote from: The Left Side on February 02, 2011, 11:28:51 PMQuote from: luke25 on February 02, 2011, 11:09:43 PMHow the fuck has Suarez been credited with that goal?Probably because the media fall over themselves to love the red scouse and king kenny!And not because it was er...actually Suarez's goal?Really? Yes. As per my previous post.If it's going in should the defender not be there then it's the striker's goal.If the defender intervenes to turn a shot that's NOT going in into a goal then it's an own-goal. So yes, of course it's Suarez's goal.I'd think the fact that Wilkinson put it in 2 yards in front of the line would've meant it was an own goal
If it's going in should the defender not be there then it's the striker's goal.If the defender intervenes to turn a shot that's NOT going in into a goal then it's an own-goal. So yes, of course it's Suarez's goal.
Just seen the Blose penalty decision on MOTD. Looked like obstruction (or "impeding the progression of an opponent as it's now called apparently) to me, which I'm pretty sure is an indirect free-kick and I'm pretty sure referees are still allowed to give indirect free-kicks in the box.Any of our resident referees care to share their thoughts as to why you never see indirect free-kicks given in the box?
Routledge scores a late winner. Is that 8 points clear now?