Quote from: Damo70 on September 15, 2014, 05:49:14 PMFrom what I heard of Rodgers response to questions about the Senderos and Balotelli stuff he was far more impressive than Wenger or Mourinho would have been. Basically it is a man's game so you have to man up. Wenger would have seen everything for a change and Mourinho would have been bringing it up in a year's time even if one of his players had decapitated one of ours in the meantime.He was very close to the Hutton tackle and didn't even bat an eyelid.
From what I heard of Rodgers response to questions about the Senderos and Balotelli stuff he was far more impressive than Wenger or Mourinho would have been. Basically it is a man's game so you have to man up. Wenger would have seen everything for a change and Mourinho would have been bringing it up in a year's time even if one of his players had decapitated one of ours in the meantime.
Quote from: silhillvilla on September 15, 2014, 05:17:30 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 15, 2014, 04:19:50 PMNothing in football is as amusing as Liverpool supporters who believe the media and authorities have it in for them. They don't just say it - they truly believe it.The whole psyche of that city is one of being a victim. Stems back decades. With good reason very often, and it's not their proper supporters who are the worst culprits in this case. Which leads me onto something else I've often wondered. Why do we call Manchester United supporters Cockneys/from Surrey and the rest of it, and Liverpool Scousers when they have more out of towners than anyone?
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 15, 2014, 04:19:50 PMNothing in football is as amusing as Liverpool supporters who believe the media and authorities have it in for them. They don't just say it - they truly believe it.The whole psyche of that city is one of being a victim. Stems back decades.
Nothing in football is as amusing as Liverpool supporters who believe the media and authorities have it in for them. They don't just say it - they truly believe it.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 15, 2014, 05:20:44 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on September 15, 2014, 05:17:30 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on September 15, 2014, 04:19:50 PMNothing in football is as amusing as Liverpool supporters who believe the media and authorities have it in for them. They don't just say it - they truly believe it.The whole psyche of that city is one of being a victim. Stems back decades. With good reason very often, and it's not their proper supporters who are the worst culprits in this case. Which leads me onto something else I've often wondered. Why do we call Manchester United supporters Cockneys/from Surrey and the rest of it, and Liverpool Scousers when they have more out of towners than anyone?My guess would be that the Man U era of dominance coincided with a period of high attendances throughout the PL, so it was a easy 'win' to piss off a Man U fan, "you're a glory hunter who can't even be bothered to turn up." The Liverpool era coincided with lower attendances (crowd violence?) so actually attending was less of a badge of honour. I wasn't old enough to go during the 80's but had season tickets through the second half of the nineties and that alone was justification to dismiss the opinion of most Man U fans I met.
The media have it in for Liverpool. Who?Alan Green. Lawro. Fowler. Owen. Hamman. Jamič Redknapp. Colin Murray. Maybe Kelly Kate. Or The Appaling DJ Spooney. Maybe Steve Mcmanam. Alan Hansen. Danny Murphy. Stvev Wilson. Jan Molby. Maybe Paul Jewell. Even bellend Savage was a Liverpool fan when he was a kid.The list of those who have it in for Liverpool is endless.