Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: andyh on January 13, 2015, 09:38:53 AM

Title: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 13, 2015, 09:38:53 AM
Mods, please merge if this needs to be in one of the other Lambert related threads


http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-fans-plan-empty-8435436
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Monty on January 13, 2015, 09:40:40 AM
Frankly, I think that's the kind of thing you save for Leeds-style mismanagement. Not liking the manager seems a pretty inadequate reason.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 09:47:30 AM
I hate that song "We want our Villa back".

Its an interesting idea for a protest though, can't see it working. I will be in my seat watching two teams who are masters of the pass it side ways game thrill me with their inventive football.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: richtheholtender on January 13, 2015, 09:51:38 AM
I think it would be aimed at Lerner to be honest. I think Lambert has got the message now.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Gareth on January 13, 2015, 10:09:59 AM
Hope Robbie Fowler isn't playing, it'll be game over by the time some are seated :-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 10:21:45 AM
I quite liked the silent protest I saw on YouTube with one of the Swedish teams. Full house, but it was eerily quiet for a set period of time before they all started going mental with their support.

I think a silent protest would be very easy to organise.
 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: levico on January 13, 2015, 10:23:55 AM
I think most of us are going to be pretty silent anyway as we watch Liverpool batter us.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: B90 villain on January 13, 2015, 10:29:38 AM
I reckon a better protest would have been to boycott the Bournemouth game.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: olaftab on January 13, 2015, 10:33:03 AM
I think most of us are going to be pretty silent anyway as we watch Liverpool batter us.
I know we are not a very exciting team but why do you just assume Liverpool are going to batter us?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 10:33:57 AM
I think most of us are going to be pretty silent anyway as we watch Liverpool batter us.
I know we are not a very exciting team but why do you just assume Liverpool are going to batter us?

He assumes everybody is going to batter us and has been assuming we'll be relegated every season for the past four. That's just him.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dave on January 13, 2015, 10:36:23 AM
We've not really been 'battered' by anybody this season. It wouldn't surprise me if we're properly taken apart a couple of times between now and May, but I'd be amazed if the team doing it is the current Liverpool side at Villa Park.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 13, 2015, 10:38:01 AM
I'll be playing my part by not going, I'm not paying a penny until the manager is gone
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 13, 2015, 10:39:10 AM
It would be good to see but I can't see how you could organise this - not everybody uses fan websites/twitter
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 10:44:40 AM
Stoke is the better game for a stay away protest as it will only be a circa 26k crowd anyway. If we can wipe another 10k off that gate then Fox may actually take note ??
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ClaretAndBlueBlood on January 13, 2015, 10:55:33 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 11:02:10 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Here is a good example of "in - fighting"
This is the sort of thing we saw Saturday
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Gareth on January 13, 2015, 11:08:17 AM
Can't see this form of 'protest' working, telling a couple of hundred people on a web forum to boycott 8 minutes will barely register a blip on the clubs radar....the original '£' sign is the only protest I remember having any real traction.  Spontaneous outpouring of vitriol at Lambert & Lerner if the game is going badly is the only way of getting an immediate message across.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ClaretAndBlueBlood on January 13, 2015, 11:14:33 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Here is a good example of "in - fighting"
This is the sort of thing we saw Saturday

protesting during games helps no-one
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 13, 2015, 11:14:36 AM
Can't see this form of 'protest' working, telling a couple of hundred people on a web forum to boycott 8 minutes will barely register a blip on the clubs radar....the original '£' sign is the only protest I remember having any real traction.  Spontaneous outpouring of vitriol at Lambert & Lerner if the game is going badly is the only way of getting an immediate message across.

I think the booing and barracking of Lambert would eventually work - the fans may not mean much but it would certainly tarnish the clubs image
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 11:16:53 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Here is a good example of "in - fighting"
This is the sort of thing we saw Saturday

protesting during games helps no-one
Agree just boycott Stoke game in it's entirety may work better
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: berneboy on January 13, 2015, 11:17:53 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Here is a good example of "in - fighting"
This is the sort of thing we saw Saturday

protesting during games helps no-one

I agree. Write, email, whatever but support the team during the match.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ClaretAndBlueBlood on January 13, 2015, 11:18:30 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Here is a good example of "in - fighting"
This is the sort of thing we saw Saturday

protesting during games helps no-one

I agree. Write, email, whatever but support the team during the match.

or just stay away and save your pennies
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 13, 2015, 11:21:18 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
There will be people who will not want to support this.
Equally, there will be people who do. This may including season ticket holders, or people who have attended for years, maybe decades.
You are telling them they can't show their frustration and displeasure at the way they see the club going.
Is this, better fan than you syndrome ?         
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 11:24:01 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
There will be people who will not want to support this.
Equally, there will be people who do. This may including season ticket holders, or people who have attended for years, maybe decades.
You are telling them they can't show their frustration and displeasure at the way they see the club going.
Are you a better fan than them, then ?         
Well said. Everyone is entitled to support / protest in their own way and there is no need to tell people to "fuck off"
Turning up week in week out like some lapdog lemming may not be helping the club either. Have you thought about that .
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 13, 2015, 11:24:21 AM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Here is a good example of "in - fighting"
This is the sort of thing we saw Saturday

protesting during games helps no-one

I agree. Write, email, whatever but support the team during the match.

or just stay away and save your pennies

or go and voice your opinion on how your club is being run.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ClaretAndBlueBlood on January 13, 2015, 11:38:19 AM
that's fair enough, and when I said fuck off I wasn't actually telling people to fuck off of course. You're right, everyone is entitled to protest as they see fit, and in the past in the Ellis glory days I too protested.

I was actually making the point that I won't be joining in the protest, I think protesting during the game helps no-one and will achieve nothing. If people stay away in large enough numbers then that may achieve something, may not, not sure how much the club rely on the gate money these days. Again, I wont be staying away for league games as I have already paid for my ticket but I didn't attend the Blackpool game and I wont be going to the Bournemouth game.

And of course I'm a better fan than you, I'm the best fan ever ever ever :-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: mattjpa on January 13, 2015, 12:03:35 PM
Sadly, I can't join in this protest as I'm already holding my own silent one and not going. If I'm served shit food in restaurants I don't go back, transformers the movie was shit so I didn't go and see the next two. I spent a load of money going to the Sunderland game which was rubbish, watched palace and Leicester on the Internet which was even worse so cancelled plans to go to Liverpool and Bournemouth.
The national media have picked up on this protest already, if we don't want to be watching shit football and contestant relegation battles, we as fans should be 100% behind this.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Holte L2 on January 13, 2015, 12:10:26 PM
I quite liked the silent protest I saw on YouTube with one of the Swedish teams. Full house, but it was eerily quiet for a set period of time before they all started going mental with their support.

I think a silent protest would be very easy to organise.
 

We do that every home game anyway.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 13, 2015, 12:15:50 PM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner
Here is a good example of "in - fighting"
This is the sort of thing we saw Saturday

protesting during games helps no-one

I agree. Write, email, whatever but support the team during the match.

or just stay away and save your pennies

or go and voice your opinion on how your club is being run.

It's a bit expensive to go down to shout at the team
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: UK Redsox on January 13, 2015, 12:20:35 PM
I hate that song "We want our Villa back".

Me too. "Our Villa" hasn't gone anywhere; its just shit at football at the moment.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: exigo on January 13, 2015, 12:20:40 PM
I quite liked the silent protest I saw on YouTube with one of the Swedish teams. Full house, but it was eerily quiet for a set period of time before they all started going mental with their support.

I think a silent protest would be very easy to organise.
 

Like the first 75 minutes of the Sunderland game?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Risso on January 13, 2015, 12:27:17 PM
I like the cardboard arrows pointing at the goal idea. If they all said Lambert Out, even better.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: exigo on January 13, 2015, 12:28:18 PM
I like the cardboard arrows pointing at the goal idea. If they all said Lambert Out, even better.

And maybe the lower Trinity can have some that point away from the home dugout.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Bully2345 on January 13, 2015, 12:28:38 PM
I'll turn up and watch the full 90 minutes in the Holte End. My guess is that most people will do the same.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: glasses on January 13, 2015, 12:31:31 PM
(http://www.creativereview.co.uk/images/uploads/2012/03/fcmagdeburgberlinerak1at569_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 13, 2015, 12:36:38 PM
I quite liked the silent protest I saw on YouTube with one of the Swedish teams. Full house, but it was eerily quiet for a set period of time before they all started going mental with their support.

I think a silent protest would be very easy to organise.
 

That was very good, but did it ultimately achieve anything? What was impressive was getting both sets of fans to be silent for the first 10 mins.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 13, 2015, 12:44:22 PM
That's brilliant, PWS.

I can't see how the protest will work. In fact it's obvious it won't. A silent protest or fans turning their back on the game for one minute would have a far highly chance of succeeding.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: McGraths Dry Cleaning on January 13, 2015, 12:46:20 PM
I think everyone will get behind the team. - just the increased media attention has added a sense of focus to the game. If the team give 100% (or as Savage et al would say 110%) and look like they give a shi* about Villa then even if we lose I don't think things will get hostile.

Incidentally I had 4 tickets for the game and someone wanted to come and I easily moved to a row of 5 seats together - I was a bit surprised there were this many seats together this close to the game but maybe this isn't unusual.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: DeKuip on January 13, 2015, 12:51:14 PM
Oh what a laugh the rest of us will have when we score the only two goals of the game inside the first eight minutes!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 12:57:46 PM
Oh what a laugh the rest of us will have when we score the only two goals of the game inside the first eight minutes!


Ha ha!

We do normally start quite well in games, have a good 10-15 minutes before normal service resumes. It would be hilarious if we start like a train on fire and bag a couple, put in the best 8 minutes of the season, before we bore out the remaining 82.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 13, 2015, 12:58:29 PM
I reckon there's more chance of seeing this happen at Villa Park.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ozzjim on January 13, 2015, 01:10:15 PM
We've not really been 'battered' by anybody this season. It wouldn't surprise me if we're properly taken apart a couple of times between now and May, but I'd be amazed if the team doing it is the current Liverpool side at Villa Park.

It would not have flattered Leicester had it been 5 or 6 last week. Clark was one of our better players and is out now. Baker and Okore have not had much of a chance to play together either. I could easily see a Liverpool side who have been looking slightly more lively the last couple of weeks getting 2-3 up on us and it turning very acidic this weekend.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 01:12:59 PM
If there is a goal on Saturday, it will only be the one.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: joe_c on January 13, 2015, 01:16:42 PM
I stopped reading after myoldmansaid.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: jeowje on January 13, 2015, 01:18:23 PM
Speaking of the £ sign protest- that culminated in the signing of JPA, who was introduced on the pitch before the Liverpool home fixture that year... dismal performance and lost 3-0. Not entirely relevant sorry, this thread just reminded me of it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: eric woolban woolban on January 13, 2015, 01:18:23 PM
The best protest would be for all to turn up at the game five minutes after kick off, potentially causing the game to be delayed. Better if it was for a televised game.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 01:20:57 PM
The best protest would be for all to turn up at the game five minutes after kick off, potentially causing the game to be delayed. Better if it was for a televised game.
That sounds dangerous
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: not3bad on January 13, 2015, 01:24:45 PM
Since I'd probably be late for my own funeral this one will be an easy one for me.  Viva la revolution!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: jeowje on January 13, 2015, 01:34:19 PM
I think we should make our displeasure known by leaving in our droves 10-12 minutes before the final whistle, regardless of whether we are winning or losing... oh wait a minute  :)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: levico on January 13, 2015, 01:36:26 PM
I think we should make our displeasure known by leaving in our droves 10-12 minutes before the final whistle, regardless of whether we are winning or losing... oh wait a minute  :)

Sire, what is this "winning" that you talk about?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 01:40:03 PM
We could ask liverpool to wear black armbands out of respect for our plight
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dave on January 13, 2015, 01:42:37 PM
We've not really been 'battered' by anybody this season. It wouldn't surprise me if we're properly taken apart a couple of times between now and May, but I'd be amazed if the team doing it is the current Liverpool side at Villa Park.

It would not have flattered Leicester had it been 5 or 6 last week. Clark was one of our better players and is out now. Baker and Okore have not had much of a chance to play together either. I could easily see a Liverpool side who have been looking slightly more lively the last couple of weeks getting 2-3 up on us and it turning very acidic this weekend.
Before Baker was injured and Clark came in, he was also one of our better players.

I could probably see Liverpool going a couple of goals ahead as well. It's certainly more likely than us going a couple of goals up. As Ads says, it'll probably be 1-1, 0-0 or 0-1.

But even if we lose 2-0 or even 3-0 to Liverpool, that wouldn't be a 'hammering'.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on January 13, 2015, 01:57:38 PM
fuck off with your protest. If you want to protest then do so by not going. I will be there supporting my team and hoping that my support will help us to get something out of the game and maybe, just maybe, turn a corner

I read that incorrectly at first and thought 'yes it would be nice for us to get a corner'....
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ChicagoLion on January 13, 2015, 02:13:03 PM
Not sure if I agree with The Villa Peoples Front or The Peoples Front of Villa, tough call.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Chipsticks on January 13, 2015, 02:14:54 PM
It's an idea that's been pitched before but I won't be partaking. I don't think it'll have an impact and I think it'd be more beneficial to be out there supporting the team.

If we happen to score early I bet they'd all come running out...
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Risso on January 13, 2015, 02:22:43 PM
If my infrequent visits to Vilka Park are anything to go by, at least half the ground leave it until 3.05 to take their seats anyway, as they shuffle past muttering sorry with a cup of coffee in each hand.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Des Little on January 13, 2015, 02:29:08 PM
I'm usually rolling in from the boozer about that time for most home games.  Minus the coffee if you don't mind. Fat lot of good my one man protest has done.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Leighton on January 13, 2015, 02:47:52 PM
The most effective time and place to protest is during a game whilst in the stands.

We can write as many letters to the club as we like (as i have previously done), we can sign as many Lambert Out online petitions as we like (as i have done) and we can phone up the local radio stations and vent our spleen as often as we like (as i do).

But the only way that you can guarantee that our voices are heard by the board, management, players are where and when it matters most. I believe this is still showing your support, and in many cases it is better to show just how annoyed and angry we are rather than just happy clapping and accepting our lot each week.

I hope the protest works, but i do have my concerns that not enough people will go through with it when it comes to 3pm to 3:08pm, and it will look just like most home games this season- an half empty Holte- which is in itself an even bigger protest!

UTV!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: olaftab on January 13, 2015, 02:57:12 PM
If my infrequent visits to Vilka Park are anything to go by, at least half the ground leave it until 3.05 to take their seats anyway, as they shuffle past muttering sorry with a cup of coffee in each hand.
Don't  know why you go to Vilka Park? At Villa Park coffee is served  at your seat.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 03:03:30 PM
I don't think you should protest during a game. I don't think it does the team any good.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Des Little on January 13, 2015, 03:10:29 PM
It may be more effective if the midfield continued their absence from the opposition half for the full 90.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Jon Crofts on January 13, 2015, 03:12:03 PM
We've not really been 'battered' by anybody this season. It wouldn't surprise me if we're properly taken apart a couple of times between now and May, but I'd be amazed if the team doing it is the current Liverpool side at Villa Park.

It would not have flattered Leicester had it been 5 or 6 last week. Clark was one of our better players and is out now. Baker and Okore have not had much of a chance to play together either. I could easily see a Liverpool side who have been looking slightly more lively the last couple of weeks getting 2-3 up on us and it turning very acidic this weekend.
Before Baker was injured and Clark came in, he was also one of our better players.

I could probably see Liverpool going a couple of goals ahead as well. It's certainly more likely than us going a couple of goals up. As Ads says, it'll probably be 1-1, 0-0 or 0-1.

But even if we lose 2-0 or even 3-0 to Liverpool, that wouldn't be a 'hammering'.

0-3 at home to a very, very average Liverpool is as good as a hammering.
That said I think it'll be a tight afternoon, they can be as bereft of ideas as us at times.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ClaretAndBlueBlood on January 13, 2015, 03:16:31 PM
I don't think you should protest during a game. I don't think it does the team any good.

a good example of that being Blackburn when they had Kean as manager. The fans there took an instant dislike to him and never gave him a chance but in all honesty, they showed in quite a few games that they weren't that bad a team. I am pretty sure they would have stayed up if the fans had supported the team during games and had given him a chance

look at them now
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 13, 2015, 03:18:00 PM
Have to disagree mate !
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Leighton on January 13, 2015, 03:23:03 PM
I don't think you should protest during a game. I don't think it does the team any good.

As apposed to the excellent way the team have been playing and scoring loads of goals and grabbing three points each match, whilst the fans have been generally supportive?

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 03:31:45 PM
I don't think you should protest during a game. I don't think it does the team any good.

As apposed to the excellent way the team have been playing and scoring loads of goals and grabbing three points each match, whilst the fans have been generally supportive?


The fans at home aren't supportive. Villa Park is a reaction crowd and there has been nothing to react too, so its been quiet.

I think its a distraction and booing itself never helps. We were as bad as we have been all season against Leicester so the response was probably predictable.

The best and most effective protest, if you want to do it, is to stay away.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 03:33:18 PM
Don't think it will work v liverpool , too many plastic scousers , tourists and day trippers will be in attendance
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: LeeB on January 13, 2015, 03:33:39 PM
I don't think you should protest during a game. I don't think it does the team any good.

As apposed to the excellent way the team have been playing and scoring loads of goals and grabbing three points each match, whilst the fans have been generally supportive?


The fans at home aren't supportive. Villa Park is a reaction crowd and there has been nothing to react too, so its been quiet.

I think its a distraction and booing itself never helps. We were as bad as we have been all season against Leicester so the response was probably predictable.

The best and most effective protest, if you want to do it, is to stay away.

I've tried that one, it doesn't seem to work.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Taylor on January 13, 2015, 03:40:51 PM
I dread to think what Carles Gil would think as he strides out to a half empty Villa park on Saturday all baying for his new manager's head. I've been in the "Lambert out" camp now for a while now, but it looks like he's here for a while longer, so time to get behind the team.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: tomd2103 on January 13, 2015, 03:52:32 PM
The best protest would be for all to turn up at the game five minutes after kick off, potentially causing the game to be delayed. Better if it was for a televised game.
That sounds dangerous

As does the idea of having everyone with a ticket in the Holte waiting in the concourses while the game kicks off.  It is pretty cramped on match days, so I can't imagine what it would be like if everyone is down there.  Then there is the issue of everyone trying to get to their seat at the same time. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ClaretAndBlueBlood on January 13, 2015, 04:30:28 PM
Have to disagree mate !

get your own name :-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 13, 2015, 04:33:49 PM
The best protest would be for all to turn up at the game five minutes after kick off, potentially causing the game to be delayed. Better if it was for a televised game.
That sounds dangerous

As does the idea of having everyone with a ticket in the Holte waiting in the concourses while the game kicks off.  It is pretty cramped on match days, so I can't imagine what it would be like if everyone is down there.  Then there is the issue of everyone trying to get to their seat at the same time. 

The upper Holte must have the biggest concourses outside of Wembley. We have two decks to choose from as well.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 13, 2015, 04:34:19 PM
Quote
Aston Villa supporters are being urged to 'vacate the Holte End' for the first eight minutes of the game against Liverpool in a protest against the running of the club.

That sounds a brilliant idea.

Quote
A letter posted on the www.thevillablog.co.uk/ . www.myoldmansaid.com,  and www.avillafan.com calls for fans to show a united front and vote with their feet to make a statement against the club.

What a shit idea.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: adrenachrome on January 13, 2015, 04:57:59 PM
Quote
Aston Villa supporters are being urged to 'vacate the Holte End' for the first eight minutes of the game against Liverpool in a protest against the running of the club.

That sounds a brilliant idea.

Quote
A letter posted on the www.thevillablog.co.uk/ . www.myoldmansaid.com,  and www.avillafan.com calls for fans to show a united front and vote with their feet to make a statement against the club.

What a shit idea.

The world is waiting with baited breath for The Admin's advice. Whither TBAR?

Do we need a poll on this thread? I vote no but see this as a "stalking horse" for other forms of protest which may shortly be required.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 13, 2015, 05:18:33 PM
MyOldManSaid need to change their website name to payattentiontome.com

We've just signed a new player. Let's cheer him and the rest of the team on and beat Liverpool. If we play crap again, boo after the game (or during if we aren't making much effort).
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Tugby Villain on January 13, 2015, 05:25:35 PM
I think it should be done.  We all complain about Lambert and the current set - up, but then do nothing other than the occasional round of boos.  Unless something noticeable is done, Fox and friends will not take notice.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: DeKuip on January 13, 2015, 05:30:31 PM
SSN have dispatched Pete Colley and his camera crew to Villa Park as they've been tipped off this protest has already started.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dominic22 on January 13, 2015, 05:32:52 PM
not for me thanks, I have enough crap I deal with all week, Villa good and bad is an escape and so will go and enjoy or moan like always then vent my spleen on here or to friends after. I am not walking out etc.

I am sure we need a change but I start off on a Sunday or Monday wanting them all to go, by the wednesday I think well just need a bit of tinkering and then by Thursday/Friday I think well maybe this is the week it all changes. Stupid I know but that has been the same pre all this crap.

It seems also the Mail or websites just want to be seen to shout the loudest. One will say lets not cheer so the other will say we will come in 10 mins late then some keyboard warrior will have us marching on Bodymoor daubing graffiti on the wall which still ranks as about as embarrassed as I have ever been to support this club.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: chrisw1 on January 13, 2015, 07:25:57 PM
Having just signed a £3m player there is no prospect of us sacking Lambert at the moment and it's a total waste of breath asking for Lerner / Fox to do so do so.  The energy would be better spent getting behind the team to see if this new style can evolve into something better. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: peter w on January 13, 2015, 07:30:34 PM
Maybe a Leighton flag is needed?

We don't dislike you
We're just bored of you
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 07:31:04 PM
This could divide the fans even further which plays into Lerners hands
Equally sitting doing nothing isn't an option
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pete3206 on January 13, 2015, 07:43:39 PM
What a fucking pantomime. All this does is pander to those fans who were hell bent on ruining everyone's day at Leicester last week. Can you imagine the potential danger of vast swathes of people trying to get to their seat on 8 minutes, together with the "I'm a better fan than you" brigade?

Turn up, shout yourself hoarse and hope/pray we can get something from the game. Voice your disapproval at the end of the match, by all means. I'm pretty certain that the board at Aston Villa know exactly how the fans feel about things at the moment, but they obviously aren't planning a managerial change as things stand.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ez on January 13, 2015, 07:44:25 PM
I don't think you should protest during a game. I don't think it does the team any good.
It could be argued that getting behind the team hasn't done us any good either.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Chris Smith on January 13, 2015, 07:46:45 PM
This could divide the fans even further which plays into Lerners hands
Equally sitting doing nothing isn't an option

Doing 'nothing' is exactly what the majority of people will be doing, i.e. completely ignoring it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 13, 2015, 07:49:28 PM
Have to disagree mate !

get your own name :-)
I'll look on you ad a 'blood brother' ;-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: caster troy on January 13, 2015, 07:51:40 PM
I don't think you should protest during a game. I don't think it does the team any good.
It could be argued that getting behind the team hasn't done us any good either.

Exactly. How can it get any worse? If we played in front of an empty stadium maybe we'd manage a goal at least.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Richard E on January 13, 2015, 07:57:50 PM
We should sing to the Liverpool fans 'You've only come to see the Muslims.'
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 07:59:13 PM
This could divide the fans even further which plays into Lerners hands
Equally sitting doing nothing isn't an option

Doing 'nothing' is exactly what the majority of people will be doing, i.e. completely ignoring it.
Probably yes . Still I think a good number will partake. Of course if we muster a win somehow this will all be quickly forgotten for a few weeks
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: bertlambshank on January 13, 2015, 07:59:51 PM
A protest will make no difference to an owner who see's us as an annoyance.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Can Gana Be Bettered!?!? on January 13, 2015, 08:01:59 PM
I like the idea, but for every year of Lerners ownership? It hasn't all been bad.

The idea is right, the reason is wrong. I'd say more for the shit of the last 4 years. Not just shit. But constant, turgid, crap that nobody deserves to be put through every week.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: amfy on January 13, 2015, 08:04:39 PM
The more I think about this, the worse the idea gets.

Far from stopping in-fighting and uniting fans - I am imagining some fans arriving (especially those who arrive close to kick off/a little late) and wanting to get straight to their seats, being blocked by fans who are waiting til the 8th minute to go out, and fights breaking out in the crowded concourse.

Meanwhile - out on The Holte, it will look pretty much like any other week. It'll be reasonably full because it is padded out by plastic scouters, and some people will arrive 5-10 minutes late. It really won't be impactful.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ez on January 13, 2015, 08:04:45 PM
I thought the 11th minute round of applause for our league goals was a better idea.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Walmley_Villa on January 13, 2015, 08:09:41 PM
I thought the 11th minute round of applause for our league goals was a better idea.
What if we score in the first 10 mins do we move it to the 12th minute?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Nastylee on January 13, 2015, 08:33:44 PM
I thought the 11th minute round of applause for our league goals was a better idea.
What if we score in the first 10 mins do we move it to the 12th minute?

I think most people will faint from shock in this scenario.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 13, 2015, 08:37:27 PM
Lets just hope we aren't three up after 8 minutes we will look right morons.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Richard E on January 13, 2015, 08:38:27 PM
Lets just hope we aren't three up after 8 minutes we will look right morons.

I think I'd be able to live with the embarrassment!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: bruisedshins on January 13, 2015, 08:42:55 PM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 09:15:16 PM
The more I think about this , the more I think fair play to those doing something. Don't agree with the 8th minute for 8 seasons thing .
Just singing lambert out and sacked in the morning , you don't know what you're doing etc works for me and the press latch onto that nicely .
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: CJ on January 13, 2015, 09:27:44 PM
So some people think it's a good idea to delay going in, then thousands all crowd the stairways at the same time, creating a crush in the process. Against Liverpool. I think this is possibly the worst idea for a protest anyone could conceive of.

I'll be taking my seat at my normal time, support the team, and if we get the same old turgid dross I'll let my feelings be known at the end.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archie on January 13, 2015, 09:36:47 PM
I think it is a great idea, it is the only way to send the board a clear message.
Inter fans began to desert the stadium and the obtained that the club sacked Walter Mazzarri, an average manager who had just had his contract renewed for inexplicable reasons.
Fingers  Crossed.
Villa fans are the best. . .
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 13, 2015, 09:42:36 PM
The more I think about this the more concerned I get.
Yes I am certain Lambert needs to go and The prudent thing for Lerner to do would be to replace him this week.This would have the effect of galvanising the support behind the team and Liverpool would be facing something like the atmosphere created for Bent's debut against Man City.
Sadly we all know Lerner won't act and Liverpool will face a very divided ,confused and leaderless club.
I'm actually quite worried from a safety point of view and also the damage a poisonous atmosphere will cause to our chances of staying up.
Unbelievable how badly Lerner has been as the 'custodian' of our wonderful club,it's tragic.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Kingthing on January 13, 2015, 09:53:52 PM


Does anyone remember the red card protest in about 1989, it was, I think, against Man U 0-0, can't remember what it was about though.

This protest won't work, it'll be half arsed and make us look bellends. I prefer a large banner with "we're shit...get over it" 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: b23 on January 13, 2015, 09:58:22 PM
Does anybody know the capacity of The Holte end please ?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ez on January 13, 2015, 09:58:29 PM


Does anyone remember the red card protest in about 1989, it was, I think, against Man U 0-0, can't remember what it was about though.

This protest won't work, it'll be half arsed and make us look bellends. I prefer a large banner with "we're shit...get over it" 

Was it for an identity card scheme?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 13, 2015, 09:59:03 PM


Does anyone remember the red card protest in about 1989, it was, I think, against Man U 0-0, can't remember what it was about though.



Identity cards. The high water mark of the supporter movement; that was my Scargill at Saltley Gates moment.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Billy Walker on January 13, 2015, 10:02:27 PM
Knowing how Brendan Rodgers likes to get Liverpool attacking straight from kick off - his idea always seems to be to try and catch teams cold in the first ten-fifteen minutes - I think Villa fans creating a toxic atmosphere right from the first whistle is a crazy idea.   

Leave the ninety minutes for 110% backing for the team - protest, if you wish to protest, after the final whistle.  As things stand, we seem to be  doing all we can to hand the opposition an easy three points. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Kingthing on January 13, 2015, 10:08:26 PM
Does anybody know the capacity of The Holte end please ?

13,472
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 10:17:45 PM
Once it goes no shots on target for 60 mins then goes 0-1, 0-2 we will have a fairly organic protest of sorts.
Surprise me villa !
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 13, 2015, 10:18:06 PM
Where are 13500 fans going to stand for 8 minutes?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 10:19:15 PM
Where are 13500 fans going to stand for 8 minutes?
In the pie queue like most weeks
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 13, 2015, 10:21:44 PM
Haha silly me of course.  Health and safety might not be happy with people all standing around a concourse then piling up to their seats at exactly the same time.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 10:27:15 PM
Haha silly me of course.  Health and safety might not be happy with people all standing around a concourse then piling up to their seats at exactly the same time.
At the end of the day id be surprised if more than say 1500-2000 take part in this
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 13, 2015, 10:29:26 PM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 10:35:14 PM
A good old bed sheet with "ZZZZZZZ" daubed on it should suffice.
Or maybe everyone turn up in pyjamas
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 13, 2015, 10:42:24 PM
We're not fickle. We're just bored.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 13, 2015, 10:46:02 PM
I like the Lambert Isn't Working one.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 13, 2015, 10:47:21 PM
Quite liked the brief chant on Saturday
"Dud dud dud dud shot on target"
Was only song once . Obviously .
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 13, 2015, 10:57:39 PM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)

I am dead set against the idea of a protest. But if anybody does do a banner I hope its something as good as this. Top marks.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: cdward on January 13, 2015, 11:25:36 PM
Have to disagree mate !

get your own name :-)
Et tu Brute!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: b23 on January 13, 2015, 11:32:06 PM
Does anybody know the capacity of The Holte end please ?

13,472

Thanks Kingthing.

Where are 13500 fans going to stand for 8 minutes?

Exactly.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 13, 2015, 11:45:12 PM
I have a feeling that any type of crowd hanging around underneath the concourses will be asked to go to their seats or be ejected, at which point they will complain that the club are being unfair in not allowing them to create a hazard.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on January 13, 2015, 11:46:00 PM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)

Nice. I like it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 14, 2015, 12:19:26 AM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)
Nice sentiment but it's dated and too wordy.
Sometimes less is more.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: brontebilly on January 14, 2015, 12:45:40 AM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)

Seems like quite a few posters on here may have framed copies of that image above their mantelpiece. Deference to supposed authority still alive and well on H&V.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2015, 12:52:55 AM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)

Seems like quite a few posters on here may have framed copies of that image above their mantelpiece. Deference to supposed authority still alive and well on H&V.

Yes, we're all Tories here.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 14, 2015, 01:01:13 AM
BLUE ARMY!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Jim Shoes on January 14, 2015, 01:27:35 AM
I hope this fails to happen as it's so small time, what do the organisers think will happen after 8mins? that they will march in being welcomed like heroes?

They will be laughed at by everyone around the country because it's pointless, they want change but so does Lerner (who wont be there to see it). If a billionaire were to be interested then I'm sure Lerner would be only too happy to sit down with him and do the deal. You can protest for 8 or 82mins it isn't going to change that fact that as far as we know no one has the money or interest to buy Aston Villa right now.
 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 14, 2015, 01:35:03 AM
I hope this fails to happen as it's so small time, what do the organisers think will happen after 8mins? that they will march in being welcomed like heroes?

They will be laughed at by everyone around the country because it's pointless, they want change but so does Lerner (who wont be there to see it). If a billionaire were to be interested then I'm sure Lerner would be only too happy to sit down with him and do the deal. You can protest for 8 or 82mins it isn't going to change that fact that as far as we know no one has the money or interest to buy Aston Villa right now.

You are right of course.

Still I think some fans have just reached such a level of frustration they want to do something, anything to create change. I am not one of them but I understand.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 14, 2015, 08:44:16 AM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)

Nice. I like it.


It just reminds me of the opening credits of the original Auf Wiedersehen Pet.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: UK Redsox on January 14, 2015, 09:27:19 AM
Where are 13500 fans going to stand for 8 minutes?

In front of the Liverpool goal where they'll be safely out of the way and not interfering with the game.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 14, 2015, 09:34:46 AM
I think someone should knock up a "Don't tell Steve Emerson i'm here" banner.

Somebody with more time than me should knock up one of these, changing 'Labour' to 'Lambert', 'Unemployment Office' to 'Holte End Exit' and 'Villa's better off without Lambert'.

(https://cdn.urbantimes.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/poster-21.jpg)

Nice. I like it.


It just reminds me of the opening credits of the original Auf Wiedersehen Pet.

It looks like a very long conga.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: enigma on January 14, 2015, 09:59:19 AM

I have a feeling that any type of crowd hanging around underneath the concourses will be asked to go to their seats or be ejected, at which point they will complain that the club are being unfair in not allowing them to create a hazard.

That wouldn't happen at all though. A few thousand people aren't going to be ejected. They'll just wait for the eight minutes to elapse and let the people take their seats again. Trying to throw that many people out could get pretty ugly and create a far bigger hazard. Better to wait a few minutes and let it all blow over.

Personally I wish the protesters well. Better that the fans start doing something than just meekly accepting whatever shit is served their way. We've been doing that for far too long.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2015, 10:02:32 AM

I have a feeling that any type of crowd hanging around underneath the concourses will be asked to go to their seats or be ejected, at which point they will complain that the club are being unfair in not allowing them to create a hazard.

That wouldn't happen at all though. A few thousand people aren't going to be ejected. They'll just wait for the eight minutes to elapse and let the people take their seats again. Trying to throw that many people out could get pretty ugly and create a far bigger hazard. Better to wait a few minutes and let it all blow over.

Personally I wish the protesters well. Better that the fans start doing something than just meekly accepting whatever shit is served their way. We've been doing that for far too long.

You reckon the police will happily let crowds gather without doing something?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: enigma on January 14, 2015, 10:08:43 AM

I have a feeling that any type of crowd hanging around underneath the concourses will be asked to go to their seats or be ejected, at which point they will complain that the club are being unfair in not allowing them to create a hazard.

That wouldn't happen at all though. A few thousand people aren't going to be ejected. They'll just wait for the eight minutes to elapse and let the people take their seats again. Trying to throw that many people out could get pretty ugly and create a far bigger hazard. Better to wait a few minutes and let it all blow over.

Personally I wish the protesters well. Better that the fans start doing something than just meekly accepting whatever shit is served their way. We've been doing that for far too long.

You reckon the police will happily let crowds gather without doing something?

Yes.

If it went on significantly longer than eight minutes then of course  they might do something. But otherwise they'd let it play out. It is only eight minutes afterall. Trying to eject a few thousand people could easily make things a whole lot worse. Police prefer 'soft policing' these days in these situations.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on January 14, 2015, 10:13:45 AM
I'm all for a protest, just not sure if the word will get around. I suppose the noise of a thousand people saying "excuse me" as they make their way to their seats at 8 minutes in could be interesting.

I think balloons are more effective myself.

As for posters...

(http://typophile.com/files/British_WW2_poster1_5647.jpg)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ron Manager on January 14, 2015, 10:17:03 AM
Mr Lambert could buy himself a little more time with the fans if he plays Carles Gil from the kick off and Senor Gil looks like a player who can improve us. As Carles seems to prefer the left hand side of the pitch to weave his magic that means Cissohko can concentrate on his defensive
play. He seems to be confident in this aspect of his performance each week.

However no doubt Mr Lambert will bring Carles on for the last few minutes (just to ease him in gently) when we are losing 2-0!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 14, 2015, 10:23:44 AM
I seriously doubt a few thousand people will be involved.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2015, 10:34:41 AM

I have a feeling that any type of crowd hanging around underneath the concourses will be asked to go to their seats or be ejected, at which point they will complain that the club are being unfair in not allowing them to create a hazard.

That wouldn't happen at all though. A few thousand people aren't going to be ejected. They'll just wait for the eight minutes to elapse and let the people take their seats again. Trying to throw that many people out could get pretty ugly and create a far bigger hazard. Better to wait a few minutes and let it all blow over.

Personally I wish the protesters well. Better that the fans start doing something than just meekly accepting whatever shit is served their way. We've been doing that for far too long.

You reckon the police will happily let crowds gather without doing something?

Yes.

If it went on significantly longer than eight minutes then of course  they might do something. But otherwise they'd let it play out. It is only eight minutes afterall. Trying to eject a few thousand people could easily make things a whole lot worse. Police prefer 'soft policing' these days in these situations.

It wouldn't start with thousands so as soon any groups begin to gather they'll be moved on.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 14, 2015, 10:35:02 AM
On the bright side, if all the Villa fans are in the concourse rather than their seats, it'll make spotting undercover daytripping gloryhunters much easier to spot.

The stewards could send in snatch squads.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 14, 2015, 10:45:15 AM
Is anyone else getting a bit tired of the general "stand up / applaud / take a swig of your Bovril / pick your nose / leave your seat / take your seat on x minutes where "x" is a number with some relevance to what ever they're referring to" thing?

This protest is a stupid idea because, even if you can get over the whole thing of how it will be perceived and what it will actually achieve, the "8" doesn't even have any relevance to what they're complaining about.

I am as depressed as the next man at the last four years and the increasing pointlessness of our situation, as well as the dreadful "leadership" shown by Lerner, but of those eight years, the first four were absolutely nothing to complain about.

And I hereby predict that that "8 years they're saying, but what about the first 4" is precisely the thing these dimwits will get picked up on in the media, which will only increase external support (think Joey Barton last week) for Lambert.

it all looks pretty fucking stupid to me, on a number of levels.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: OzVilla on January 14, 2015, 11:11:28 AM
Just seen this thread. Totally pointless exercise.

About as pointless as predicting who they new manager might be should the one with the brand spanking new 4 year contract is sacked by the owner who couldn't be bothered to attend games.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 14, 2015, 11:20:53 AM
On the bright side, if all the Villa fans are in the concourse rather than their seats, it'll make spotting undercover daytripping gloryhunters much easier to spot.

The stewards could send in snatch squads.

I am pretty sure I borrowed a video called Snatch Squad from a kid at school in the eighties who had nicked it from his older brother's collection. Starring Ginger Lynn Allen and Big Johnny Holmes if I remember correctly.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 14, 2015, 11:22:42 AM
Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Brend'Watkins on January 14, 2015, 11:24:22 AM
Agree Oz. It serves no purpose other than to make us look like Newcastle.  We're shit at the moment and have been for some time.  We know why we're shit too but if the owner isn't  willing to address that now we would be better off getting behind the team from the start.  That's what I'm going to do anyway.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2015, 11:29:11 AM
Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.

I can see an obvious flaw in the latter.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Chris Jameson on January 14, 2015, 11:34:29 AM
Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.

I can see an obvious flaw in the latter.

Why isn't there a memorial at Villa Park?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 14, 2015, 11:40:53 AM
Is anyone else getting a bit tired of the general "stand up / applaud / take a swig of your Bovril / pick your nose / leave your seat / take your seat on x minutes where "x" is a number with some relevance to what ever they're referring to" thing?

This protest is a stupid idea because, even if you can get over the whole thing of how it will be perceived and what it will actually achieve, the "8" doesn't even have any relevance to what they're complaining about.

I am as depressed as the next man at the last four years and the increasing pointlessness of our situation, as well as the dreadful "leadership" shown by Lerner, but of those eight years, the first four were absolutely nothing to complain about.

And I hereby predict that that "8 years they're saying, but what about the first 4" is precisely the thing these dimwits will get picked up on in the media, which will only increase external support (think Joey Barton last week) for Lambert.

it all looks pretty fucking stupid to me, on a number of levels.

Yes it's all a bit stupid but at least it draws the media's attention to the atrocious way Aston Villa is run from top to bottom. We hardly get a mention in the media these days so anything that shines the spotlight on the damage Lerner and Lambert are inflicting onto the club is fine by me.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Gareth on January 14, 2015, 11:45:47 AM
I don't get the protest - I can see Randy wants to sell & equally can't see a public queue of billionaires wanting to buy so what is the message? Give it away?

If the protest was to get rid of Lambert then I would understand as that can happen.

I hope it doesn't turn into the embarrassment that the anti-glazer Norwich scarf wearing one did, where the TV showed a Newton Heath fan in his scarf as a proud anti glazerite wearing his Nike Man Utd shirt, eating his Man Utd pie, drinking his Man Utd coke - must have really hurt them.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on January 14, 2015, 11:55:33 AM
It's interesting that the media have only seemed to "get" the state of Villa under lambert after the fans gave him some stick last weekend. Before then, we were getting the usual, ignorant "he's doing a good job with his hands tied" type of lazy analysis from pundits. So, in that sense, protesting/booing etc can raise awareness. And, in my opinion, sitting quietly and meekly accepting the pile of absolute shite that we regularly get served makes it look to outsiders as if we don't want any change

Not that I can talk, I'm strictly an away fan these days, so I won't be there against Liverpool 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 14, 2015, 12:04:30 PM
It's interesting that the media have only seemed to "get" the state of Villa under lambert after the fans gave him some stick last weekend. Before then, we were getting the usual, ignorant "he's doing a good job with his hands tied" type of lazy analysis from pundits. So, in that sense, protesting/booing etc can raise awareness. And, in my opinion, sitting quietly and meekly accepting the pile of absolute shite that we regularly get served makes it look to outsiders as if we don't want any change


Exactly!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 14, 2015, 12:48:53 PM
Is anyone else getting a bit tired of the general "stand up / applaud / take a swig of your Bovril / pick your nose / leave your seat / take your seat on x minutes where "x" is a number with some relevance to what ever they're referring to" thing?

This protest is a stupid idea because, even if you can get over the whole thing of how it will be perceived and what it will actually achieve, the "8" doesn't even have any relevance to what they're complaining about.

I am as depressed as the next man at the last four years and the increasing pointlessness of our situation, as well as the dreadful "leadership" shown by Lerner, but of those eight years, the first four were absolutely nothing to complain about.

And I hereby predict that that "8 years they're saying, but what about the first 4" is precisely the thing these dimwits will get picked up on in the media, which will only increase external support (think Joey Barton last week) for Lambert.

it all looks pretty fucking stupid to me, on a number of levels.

Yes it's all a bit stupid but at least it draws the media's attention to the atrocious way Aston Villa is run from top to bottom. We hardly get a mention in the media these days so anything that shines the spotlight on the damage Lerner and Lambert are inflicting onto the club is fine by me.

But that doesn't mean it is going to be positive attention, does it?

Wait and see, but if it happens, I bet you what you like we're all on here after MOTD that evening moaning about how they started talking about what a great job Lambert is doing etc etc
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on January 14, 2015, 12:59:06 PM
I don't disagree with protesting, however this is bollocks. It will just look like a load of people have arrived late. Bad traffic? Oo must be somewhere.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: gpbarr on January 14, 2015, 01:00:36 PM
Is anyone else getting a bit tired of the general "stand up / applaud / take a swig of your Bovril / pick your nose / leave your seat / take your seat on x minutes where "x" is a number with some relevance to what ever they're referring to" thing?

This protest is a stupid idea because, even if you can get over the whole thing of how it will be perceived and what it will actually achieve, the "8" doesn't even have any relevance to what they're complaining about.

I am as depressed as the next man at the last four years and the increasing pointlessness of our situation, as well as the dreadful "leadership" shown by Lerner, but of those eight years, the first four were absolutely nothing to complain about.

And I hereby predict that that "8 years they're saying, but what about the first 4" is precisely the thing these dimwits will get picked up on in the media, which will only increase external support (think Joey Barton last week) for Lambert.

it all looks pretty fucking stupid to me, on a number of levels.

Yes it's all a bit stupid but at least it draws the media's attention to the atrocious way Aston Villa is run from top to bottom. We hardly get a mention in the media these days so anything that shines the spotlight on the damage Lerner and Lambert are inflicting onto the club is fine by me.

But that doesn't mean it is going to be positive attention, does it?

Wait and see, but if it happens, I bet you what you like we're all on here after MOTD that evening moaning about how they started talking about what a great job Lambert is doing etc etc

It's rank stupid and will do nothing to help the team on the day - but it will appease the small minds of those who will do almost anything to force yet another manager change.

Thanks for helping the team
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dave on January 14, 2015, 01:00:51 PM
Is anyone else getting a bit tired of the general "stand up / applaud / take a swig of your Bovril / pick your nose / leave your seat / take your seat on x minutes where "x" is a number with some relevance to what ever they're referring to" thing?

This protest is a stupid idea because, even if you can get over the whole thing of how it will be perceived and what it will actually achieve, the "8" doesn't even have any relevance to what they're complaining about.

I am as depressed as the next man at the last four years and the increasing pointlessness of our situation, as well as the dreadful "leadership" shown by Lerner, but of those eight years, the first four were absolutely nothing to complain about.

And I hereby predict that that "8 years they're saying, but what about the first 4" is precisely the thing these dimwits will get picked up on in the media, which will only increase external support (think Joey Barton last week) for Lambert.

it all looks pretty fucking stupid to me, on a number of levels.

Yes it's all a bit stupid but at least it draws the media's attention to the atrocious way Aston Villa is run from top to bottom. We hardly get a mention in the media these days so anything that shines the spotlight on the damage Lerner and Lambert are inflicting onto the club is fine by me.

But that doesn't mean it is going to be positive attention, does it?

Wait and see, but if it happens, I bet you what you like we're all on here after MOTD that evening moaning about how they started talking about what a great job Lambert is doing etc etc
When Newcastle fans were getting angry about Pardew and Ashley a few months back, I seem to remember that most of the coverage was along the lines of "look at these oiks and their bedsheets, protesting about something and nothing with their unrealistic expectations". Rather than actually putting much scrutiny on Pardew's record over the last couple of seasons.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2015, 01:01:14 PM
Talksport are covering it this afternoon. Make of that what you will.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: montague on January 14, 2015, 01:03:50 PM
You can hurt the club other ways without affecting the team - eg boycott the club shop, online sales, and food and drink outlets.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 14, 2015, 01:04:09 PM
Is anyone else getting a bit tired of the general "stand up / applaud / take a swig of your Bovril / pick your nose / leave your seat / take your seat on x minutes where "x" is a number with some relevance to what ever they're referring to" thing?

This protest is a stupid idea because, even if you can get over the whole thing of how it will be perceived and what it will actually achieve, the "8" doesn't even have any relevance to what they're complaining about.

I am as depressed as the next man at the last four years and the increasing pointlessness of our situation, as well as the dreadful "leadership" shown by Lerner, but of those eight years, the first four were absolutely nothing to complain about.

And I hereby predict that that "8 years they're saying, but what about the first 4" is precisely the thing these dimwits will get picked up on in the media, which will only increase external support (think Joey Barton last week) for Lambert.

it all looks pretty fucking stupid to me, on a number of levels.

Yes it's all a bit stupid but at least it draws the media's attention to the atrocious way Aston Villa is run from top to bottom. We hardly get a mention in the media these days so anything that shines the spotlight on the damage Lerner and Lambert are inflicting onto the club is fine by me.

But that doesn't mean it is going to be positive attention, does it?

Wait and see, but if it happens, I bet you what you like we're all on here after MOTD that evening moaning about how they started talking about what a great job Lambert is doing etc etc
When Newcastle fans were getting angry about Pardew and Ashley a few months back, I seem to remember that most of the coverage was along the lines of "look at these oiks and their bedsheets, protesting about something and nothing with their unrealistic expectations". Rather than actually putting much scrutiny on Pardew's record over the last couple of seasons.

Indeed, right up to the day he left, totally ignoring the fact that Pardew managed one good season and the rest of his reign, they were as bad as we are now.

The football establishment protects itself. That's why they can never get their heads out of their arses for long enough to consider what it is like to be a supporter watching such shite.

They can't even imagine paying to watch 7.5 hours of football without a single goal for their team, for example.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 14, 2015, 01:31:55 PM
Quote
THE VIEW FROM ASTON VILLA: Enough is enough, we want our club back
Aston Villa supporters are planning a protest against owner Randy Lerner
Villa are 13th in the Premier League as another relegation fight beckons
Aston Villa blogger shares his thoughts on the current situation
By DAVID MICHAEL OF MYOLDMANSAID.COM
PUBLISHED: 13:03 GMT, 14 January 2015 | UPDATED: 13:04 GMT, 14 January 2015

Aston Villa look set for a third consecutive Premier League relegation battle this season and supporters are beginning to turn on manager Paul Lambert and owner Randy Lerner.
The Midlands club are currently 13th in the league just three points clear of the dreaded drop-zone and Villa have only scored 11 goals from 21 games this season.
Supporters have proposed a large-scale protest in the Holte End of Villa Park ahead of the visit of Liverpool urging fans to leave their seat vacant for the first eight minutes, the number of years Lerner has been in charge of the club.

David Michael of Aston Villa blog MyOldManSaid.com says supporters want their club back.
 
There’s a saying among Villa fans, that you don’t chose Aston Villa, it chooses you. At the moment though, supporting the club feels like having to serve a sentence for a crime you didn’t commit.
Since Martin O’Neill stormed out of the club after having drained chairman Randy Lerner’s resources in a bid to reach the honeypot of the Champions League, Villa have been in free fall.
O’Neill ultimately failed, Lerner wasn’t impressed and Villa supporters simply suffered.
Current boss Paul Lambert said after Villa’s last game, when responding to questions about agitated supporters calling for his head, that ‘the expectancy levels outweigh the realism’.
Lambert knows, though, considering his 41 and 38-point season finishes and the unwanted records he’s collected, including having the worst Premier League record of any Villa manager, one thing fans have been is patient with him.

I’ve lost count of the number of managers local rivals West Brom have fired during Lambert’s time at Villa Park.
Even in the face of constant humiliation (losing to Bradford City in a semi-final, being beaten 8-0 by Chelsea, suffering a record 10 home league defeats in a season, and losing six games in a row this season), we’ve always hoped Lambert could turn it around. But he hasn’t.
With 11 goals in 21 league games our ‘expectancy levels’ have now dropped to praying for shots on target and maybe seeing a Villa goal some day.
It’s sad.

Certainly in my lifetime, Villa have traditionally been considered a top-half team with ambitions of European football. I’ve personally seen them win everything bar the FA Cup. Yet, as the club enters its fifth consecutive relegation battle, fans' ambition has been dumbed down to Premier League survival.

Relegation shouldn’t even be in an Aston Villa supporter’s vernacular, and you have to feel sorry for the younger generation of Villa fans who have experienced nothing but the bland decay of their beloved club.
The overriding problem is a lack of strategic consistency.

There was a change in transfer policy from young and hungry (and cheap) to low-cost journeymen, an astonishing U-turn on the exiled ‘bomb squad’ players. While on the pitch, Lambert, recently switched to the same possession-based ethos he abandoned during his first season in charge.
The latest edition, again offers a chronic lack of cutting edge in the final third, but hopefully the signing of Carles Gil will remedy that and make the increasingly disillusioned Christian Benteke a threat once again.

Off the pitch, the last we heard directly from our chairman was a statement in May last year, saying he was selling the club.
He told us: ‘I owe it to Villa to move on, and look for fresh, invigorated leadership, if in my heart I feel I can no longer do the job.’
He’s still the chairman, yet we haven’t heard from him since, although we are often reminded by Lambert that Lerner owns a telephone and television, so he knows what is happening at the club.
But do you know he gave the Villa boss a new four-year contract, a mere four games after he ended the previous season with relegation form of 38 points? It’s baffling.

The new Villa CEO Tom Fox talks about the club’s future being in Europe, but increasingly-worried supporters feel it’s more likely to be in the Championship.

After all, we’ve heard the Europe line before from Fox’s predecessor.
The proposed supporter demonstration of vacating the Holte End for the first eight minutes of the game against Liverpool is simply saying ‘enough is enough’. This compromised version of Aston Villa can’t continue.
We want to be confident of what the custodians of our club are doing. We want clarity. We want ambition. And most of all, we want our Villa back.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-2909863/THE-VIEW-ASTON-VILLA-want-club-back.html#ixzz3OnkSeM3e
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: rob_bridge on January 14, 2015, 02:27:34 PM
I think it is a bad idea.

The total apathy in, around and within the club will not be galvanised by this 'protest' involving a few hundred people at most.

Lerner is trying to sell. There are no buyers. He is not willing to part with more than minimum amount of money as wants to at least cut his losses.

His failure is in not getting rid of Lambert, though I suspect his thinking is that we have been effective at avoiding relegation in the previous 4 seasons without making a change half way through the season.

After all there were calls for Houllier to be binned (justifiably in my opinion) in late December 2010, calls for McLeish not to be hired at all (justifiably) and Lambert in January 2013 (understandably) and again in the spring of last season (justifiably).

Lerner didn't blink on those occasions so I suspect this 'protest' will be largely ignored and effect little change.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Chris Jameson on January 14, 2015, 03:10:40 PM
All this we want our club back nonsense makes me think of this every single time. Leave that sort of nonsense to West Ham and Spurs fans.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Drummond on January 14, 2015, 03:33:02 PM
I don't think a protest would work.

However, if that's the plan, Surely a sit (sleep) in after the match would be a better protest. That way everyone gets to watch and support, the team doesn't get a bad atmosphere, there's no crap influence for our new signing and the point is made.

Attendances what they are, it's pretty obvious there's a protest of sorts going on from thousands of fans already!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyaston on January 14, 2015, 04:54:36 PM
Quote
THE VIEW FROM ASTON VILLA: Enough is enough, we want our club back
Aston Villa supporters are planning a protest against owner Randy Lerner
Villa are 13th in the Premier League as another relegation fight beckons
Aston Villa blogger shares his thoughts on the current situation
By DAVID MICHAEL OF MYOLDMANSAID.COM
PUBLISHED: 13:03 GMT, 14 January 2015 | UPDATED: 13:04 GMT, 14 January 2015

Aston Villa look set for a third consecutive Premier League relegation battle this season and supporters are beginning to turn on manager Paul Lambert and owner Randy Lerner.
The Midlands club are currently 13th in the league just three points clear of the dreaded drop-zone and Villa have only scored 11 goals from 21 games this season.
Supporters have proposed a large-scale protest in the Holte End of Villa Park ahead of the visit of Liverpool urging fans to leave their seat vacant for the first eight minutes, the number of years Lerner has been in charge of the club.

David Michael of Aston Villa blog MyOldManSaid.com says supporters want their club back.
 
There’s a saying among Villa fans, that you don’t chose Aston Villa, it chooses you. At the moment though, supporting the club feels like having to serve a sentence for a crime you didn’t commit.
Since Martin O’Neill stormed out of the club after having drained chairman Randy Lerner’s resources in a bid to reach the honeypot of the Champions League, Villa have been in free fall.
O’Neill ultimately failed, Lerner wasn’t impressed and Villa supporters simply suffered.
Current boss Paul Lambert said after Villa’s last game, when responding to questions about agitated supporters calling for his head, that ‘the expectancy levels outweigh the realism’.
Lambert knows, though, considering his 41 and 38-point season finishes and the unwanted records he’s collected, including having the worst Premier League record of any Villa manager, one thing fans have been is patient with him.

I’ve lost count of the number of managers local rivals West Brom have fired during Lambert’s time at Villa Park.
Even in the face of constant humiliation (losing to Bradford City in a semi-final, being beaten 8-0 by Chelsea, suffering a record 10 home league defeats in a season, and losing six games in a row this season), we’ve always hoped Lambert could turn it around. But he hasn’t.
With 11 goals in 21 league games our ‘expectancy levels’ have now dropped to praying for shots on target and maybe seeing a Villa goal some day.
It’s sad.

Certainly in my lifetime, Villa have traditionally been considered a top-half team with ambitions of European football. I’ve personally seen them win everything bar the FA Cup. Yet, as the club enters its fifth consecutive relegation battle, fans' ambition has been dumbed down to Premier League survival.

Relegation shouldn’t even be in an Aston Villa supporter’s vernacular, and you have to feel sorry for the younger generation of Villa fans who have experienced nothing but the bland decay of their beloved club.
The overriding problem is a lack of strategic consistency.

There was a change in transfer policy from young and hungry (and cheap) to low-cost journeymen, an astonishing U-turn on the exiled ‘bomb squad’ players. While on the pitch, Lambert, recently switched to the same possession-based ethos he abandoned during his first season in charge.
The latest edition, again offers a chronic lack of cutting edge in the final third, but hopefully the signing of Carles Gil will remedy that and make the increasingly disillusioned Christian Benteke a threat once again.

Off the pitch, the last we heard directly from our chairman was a statement in May last year, saying he was selling the club.
He told us: ‘I owe it to Villa to move on, and look for fresh, invigorated leadership, if in my heart I feel I can no longer do the job.’
He’s still the chairman, yet we haven’t heard from him since, although we are often reminded by Lambert that Lerner owns a telephone and television, so he knows what is happening at the club.
But do you know he gave the Villa boss a new four-year contract, a mere four games after he ended the previous season with relegation form of 38 points? It’s baffling.

The new Villa CEO Tom Fox talks about the club’s future being in Europe, but increasingly-worried supporters feel it’s more likely to be in the Championship.

After all, we’ve heard the Europe line before from Fox’s predecessor.
The proposed supporter demonstration of vacating the Holte End for the first eight minutes of the game against Liverpool is simply saying ‘enough is enough’. This compromised version of Aston Villa can’t continue.
We want to be confident of what the custodians of our club are doing. We want clarity. We want ambition. And most of all, we want our Villa back.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-2909863/THE-VIEW-ASTON-VILLA-want-club-back.html#ixzz3OnkSeM3e
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Erm its not our third consecutive relegation battle but our fifth, that is why we are so pissed off,
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 14, 2015, 05:00:11 PM
Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.

I can see an obvious flaw in the latter.

Why isn't there a memorial at Villa Park?

I don't think Randy would allow it because he's jealous of what we achieved before him.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: nick harper on January 14, 2015, 05:07:51 PM
Even if the protest is a damp squib, the media spotlight on his record and the fans disullusion has taken this a step forward in the last week and that represents progress to me. For the first time since he's been here, his record is now firmly in the spotlight.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 14, 2015, 05:08:29 PM
Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.

I can see an obvious flaw in the latter.

Why isn't there a memorial at Villa Park?

I don't think Randy would allow it because he's jealous of what we achieved before him.

There are some people who'd believe that.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 14, 2015, 05:10:09 PM
We do need a protest, but this one can't really work - as Randy probably doesn't care, he knows you've already paid to be in the ground. That's all he cares about. Shame really.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 14, 2015, 05:22:03 PM
Even if the protest is a damp squib, the media spotlight on his record and the fans disullusion has taken this a step forward in the last week and that represents progress to me. For the first time since he's been here, his record is now firmly in the spotlight.

It sure is, even a bit of accountability to the media is better than nothing. Rather than being asked bland nothing questions he's going to start to be asked what's going on and the faults highlighted.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Gareth on January 14, 2015, 05:37:12 PM
Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.

I can see an obvious flaw in the latter.

Why isn't there a memorial at Villa Park?

I don't think Randy would allow it because he's jealous of what we achieved before him.

Did Randy just get confused with Doug? 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Villa in Denmark on January 14, 2015, 08:59:50 PM
I think it is a bad idea.

The total apathy in, around and within the club will not be galvanised by this 'protest' involving a few hundred people at most.

Lerner is trying to sell. There are no buyers. He is not willing to part with more than minimum amount of money as wants to at least cut his losses.

His failure is in not getting rid of Lambert,
though I suspect his thinking is that we have been effective at avoiding relegation in the previous 4 seasons without making a change half way through the season.

After all there were calls for Houllier to be binned (justifiably in my opinion) in late December 2010, calls for McLeish not to be hired at all (justifiably) and Lambert in January 2013 (understandably) and again in the spring of last season (justifiably).

Lerner didn't blink on those occasions so I suspect this 'protest' will be largely ignored and effect little change.

Completely agree with the second point.
The first point I'm inclined to give him a bit of slack on, re the obstacles to finding a buyer.
Given that he appears to be genuine in being honourable and trying to the right thing in just about everything he does (such a great shame he's appalling at running sporting enterprises), personally I can just as easily believe that, at least in part, he's trying to ensure that he hands over to "the right sort".

However, if he drops the asking price to say £100M and sells to the second richest hairdresser in China, how well do we think that would turn out?

There's an article in the current H&V about how he gets the DNA of the club, and I think that's pretty much right.
No denying it's a risk running the 1st team the way Lambert's running it, both from a performance point if view / risk of relegation and damage to the fan base as people get out of the habit of going.

If we've got to tread water until a new owner comes in, there's no reason for it to be so eyewateringly poor in style, and this squad should be more than capable of gathering a few more points along the way than it does.

The problem I have with the argument about "well despite everything we're still 12th / 13th" is that it all feels like false security, largely because of the "styles" he's employed.
Hit and hope, or pass around with the all the penetration of a eunuch, we just don't create chances and sit far too deep.

How many of our wins this season have felt truly comfortable? We even sat back and allowed 10 man Leicester to have a go at snatching an equaliser.

You just know every time he turns a bad run around and goes 4 or 5 unbeaten, with a couple of wins, we're only ever 1 game away from another 7-8 game winless run where we only gain a couple of points and slide down the table.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 14, 2015, 09:08:13 PM
Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.

I can see an obvious flaw in the latter.

Why isn't there a memorial at Villa Park?

I don't think Randy would allow it because he's jealous of what we achieved before him.

Did Randy just get confused with Doug? 

Well then I propose a booing for 4 minutes. 1 minute for each poor season we've had in a row. Or 11 minutes, 1 for each goal we've scored. Or boo non stop until the 82nd minute signifying the players of 82 turning in their graves at our plight.

I can see an obvious flaw in the latter.

Why isn't there a memorial at Villa Park?

I don't think Randy would allow it because he's jealous of what we achieved before him.

Did Randy just get confused with Doug? 

No, I have it on good authority that he's particulary jealous of the 96/97 season when we finished 5th. He won't hear a word spoke about it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 14, 2015, 09:50:27 PM
I read the report and it said they decided on 8 minutes to mark 8 seasons of frustration under Lerner.

Surely it should be 4 as I doubt even Saunders-Heroes was dishing out Lerner abuse on here between 2006-10 when the frustrations were at MON for playing centre backs at right back and spending untold millions on rubbish british players rather than Lerner.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Witton Warrior on January 14, 2015, 10:03:55 PM
I shall be leading the 1 man protest in the Upper Trinity - meet at the betting booth next to the A1 stairs - there's always plenty of room (and a decent view of the monitor)

That'll show 'em   ;-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 14, 2015, 10:09:55 PM
Those in the Trinity should remove their ties for the first 8 minutes waving them around San Siro style.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 14, 2015, 10:13:12 PM
Those in the Trinity should remove their ties for the first 8 minutes waving them around San Siro style.

Or smuggle a scooter up there and chuck it down into the Middle Trinity.

Preferably towards the directors' box.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 14, 2015, 10:19:59 PM
The Trinity lads should make paper planes from their Daily Mail TV guide and throw them all towards the Holte Goal on 1 minute mark.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 14, 2015, 10:20:18 PM
A Vespa?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 14, 2015, 10:29:16 PM
I read the report and it said they decided on 8 minutes to mark 8 seasons of frustration under Lerner.

Surely it should be 4 as I doubt even Saunders-Heroes was dishing out Lerner abuse on here between 2006-10 when the frustrations were at MON for playing centre backs at right back and spending untold millions on rubbish british players rather than Lerner.

Absolutely. I loved Lerner's first 4 seasons, they were great. The 4.5 seasons since have been nothing short of disgraceful though.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Des Little on January 14, 2015, 10:34:42 PM
I shall be leading the 1 man protest in the Upper Trinity - meet at the betting booth next to the A1 stairs - there's always plenty of room (and a decent view of the monitor)

That'll show 'em   ;-)

Make that two man. I'm in
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 14, 2015, 11:00:14 PM
I sit in the Trinity.
I usually:
argue with the steward about me standing.
Join in with the singing from the Holte.
abuse the latecomers...for being "late" with their fu**ing tartylattecappuciniwankyfarty paper cups with lids on!
argue with the steward about me and my mate standing.
join in with the Holte.
excahange insults with the twats in the boxes just behind us - against Arse it became very physical - how no-one was ejected was incredible. Slaps were exchanged! Anywhere else in the ground there would have been "an incident".
argue with the steward about me, my mate and his daughter standing.
sing with the Holte.
chat with steward about what a hard job he's got.
go for a piss.
abuse the latecomers...for being "late" with their fu**ing tartylattecappuciniwankyfarty paper cups with lids on!
argue with the steward about me standing.
argue with the steward about the senselessness of ending my life when I am so young, handsome and things at VP can only get better.
apologise to the steward about my foul and abusive language.
ditto.
ditto.
ditto.
argue with the steward about me standing/shouting/swearing.
sit in my seat, head in hands, cry.
hold hands with the steward as a sign of solidarity, mopping my tears with his hanky.
return his hanky.
slither homewards, hoping the rain disguises my tears. And every fu**er else's.

The match day experience at VP!


 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 14, 2015, 11:50:40 PM
I read the report and it said they decided on 8 minutes to mark 8 seasons of frustration under Lerner.

Surely it should be 4 as I doubt even Saunders-Heroes was dishing out Lerner abuse on here between 2006-10 when the frustrations were at MON for playing centre backs at right back and spending untold millions on rubbish british players rather than Lerner.

Absolutely. I loved Lerner's first 4 seasons, they were great. The 4.5 seasons since have been nothing short of disgraceful though.

Yeah I have no issue if it starts at four and a half minutes. Just surprised the report on it seemed to say the whole Lerner era was a total disaster.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 15, 2015, 12:12:31 AM
Just read Brian Reade's article in the Mirror,national press taking notice and 100% backing our justification at protesting ,what's 8 minutes in the scene of things? Sod it I'm joining the protestors.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 15, 2015, 12:44:19 AM
I sit in the Trinity.
I usually:
argue with the steward about me standing.
Join in with the singing from the Holte.
abuse the latecomers...for being "late" with their fu**ing tartylattecappuciniwankyfarty paper cups with lids on!
argue with the steward about me and my mate standing.
join in with the Holte.
excahange insults with the twats in the boxes just behind us - against Arse it became very physical - how no-one was ejected was incredible. Slaps were exchanged! Anywhere else in the ground there would have been "an incident".
argue with the steward about me, my mate and his daughter standing.
sing with the Holte.
chat with steward about what a hard job he's got.
go for a piss.
abuse the latecomers...for being "late" with their fu**ing tartylattecappuciniwankyfarty paper cups with lids on!
argue with the steward about me standing.
argue with the steward about the senselessness of ending my life when I am so young, handsome and things at VP can only get better.
apologise to the steward about my foul and abusive language.
ditto.
ditto.
ditto.
argue with the steward about me standing/shouting/swearing.
sit in my seat, head in hands, cry.
hold hands with the steward as a sign of solidarity, mopping my tears with his hanky.
return his hanky.
slither homewards, hoping the rain disguises my tears. And every fu**er else's.

The match day experience at VP!

I was about to invite myself to join you until I realised I'd have to drink Bovril rather than coffee. Damn!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 15, 2015, 03:03:58 AM
I read the report and it said they decided on 8 minutes to mark 8 seasons of frustration under Lerner.

Surely it should be 4 as I doubt even Saunders-Heroes was dishing out Lerner abuse on here between 2006-10 when the frustrations were at MON for playing centre backs at right back and spending untold millions on rubbish british players rather than Lerner.

Absolutely. I loved Lerner's first 4 seasons, they were great. The 4.5 seasons since have been nothing short of disgraceful though.

you could always join the protest after 3.5 minutes SH

*winky*
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: j66acd on January 15, 2015, 07:29:13 AM
I read the report and it said they decided on 8 minutes to mark 8 seasons of frustration under Lerner.

Surely it should be 4 as I doubt even Saunders-Heroes was dishing out Lerner abuse on here between 2006-10 when the frustrations were at MON for playing centre backs at right back and spending untold millions on rubbish british players rather than Lerner.

Absolutely. I loved Lerner's first 4 seasons, they were great. The 4.5 seasons since have been nothing short of disgraceful though.

Yeah I have no issue if it starts at four and a half minutes. Just surprised the report on it seemed to say the whole Lerner era was a total disaster.

What about singing Martin give us a wave for the first 3.5 minutes and then start booing?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: adrenachrome on January 15, 2015, 04:08:34 PM
RTE Sport (http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/english/2015/0115/672878-lambert-calls-on-villa-fans-to-cancel-protest/)

Quote
Lambert calls on Villa fans to cancel protest

Updated: Thursday, 15 Jan 2015 15:54

Aston Villa manager Paul Lambert has urged frustrated fans to call off a planned protest at the start of Saturday's clash at home to Liverpool.

Three unofficial fans' websites - Villa Blog, My Old Man Said and A Villa Fan - have called on fellow supporters to boycott the opening eight minutes of the Barclays Premier League clash with the Reds via an open letter entitled 'We Want Our Villa Back'.

They claim each minute represents one year for the eight owner Randy Lerner has been in charge as they are fed up at the way the club is being run and the direction it is going.

To rub salt into the wounds of the Villa fans, they have so far seen their side score just 11 league goals this season in 21 games, easily the worst record in the top flight.

Following Saturday's 1-0 defeat at rock-bottom Leicester the patience of the fans snapped and they turned on Lambert, calling for him to be sacked.

One local newspaper has this week conducted a poll asking whether the Scot should be axed or given more time, with 67% demanding he go.

It is an unsavoury and unsettling build up for Lambert ahead of the game with Liverpool.

"I understand the frustration, and nobody is more frustrated than myself," said Lambert.

"Everybody involved with Aston Villa is frustrated at what has happened over the last five or six years since Martin O'Neill left and the team was in the top six.

"Martin had this club buzzing at that time, vying for Europe, going great, and what's happened has happened.

"But I don't think you can look at the chairman and say it's one guy's fault. It's unfair. He has the club's interest at heart.

"I understand the fans' frustrations, but we'll have a better chance of winning a game of football if they don't protest, if they stick with the lads, no matter how hard it gets at times.

"When the stadium is behind the players it's a great place to play football, and we've a better chance of winning if they don't do it.

"Whoever has planned it, I hope the guy next to them tries to keep them on their seat.

"I don't want Aston Villa fans to come to Villa Park - or even away from home - and not see the team win or not be entertained."

Lambert insists he can weather the storm of abuse from the fans as he is determined to instead shield his players.

Asked as to how he felt about calls for him to be sacked, he replied: "It's not great. I'm human, like everybody else, but I'm also big enough and strong enough mentally to handle it.

"But what I don't want it to do is affect the players.

"The fans have been great with me up until late, and I guess now they are waiting for something to go wrong.

"All I would say to them is stay behind the side. We need their support when times are tough."

Lambert has also made it clear he will not quit, adding: "I want to make a success of this.

"I'm obviously not happy with the way things are going, with what's happening in the last third of the pitch. But anybody that knows me knows I'm not one for downing tools and walking away.

"I've never done that in my football career, and I don't intend to do it now."
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 15, 2015, 04:14:33 PM
Hmmm, selective memory or fucking liar?

Livingston
After studying for football coaching qualifications in 2005, Lambert landed his first managerial job with Livingston on 1 June 2005, assisted by Norrie McWhirter.[20] Although he had not intended to play for his new club Lambert registered as a player in late August 2005 to cover for any injury shortages.[21] His tenure ended the following February when he resigned after only winning two league games since starting the job.[22]

Wycombe Wanderers
Lambert was appointed manager of English team Wycombe Wanderers on 30 June 2006.[23] He led Wycombe to the League Cup semi-finals after defeating Premier League sides Fulham and Charlton Athletic. The semi-final tie, against Premier League champions Chelsea, saw Wycombe hold Chelsea to a 1–1 draw at Adams Park before losing the away leg. This was the first time in over 30 years a fourth tier team had reached that stage of the League Cup.[citation needed] Lambert resigned as Wycombe manager on 20 May 2008 following the club's elimination from the League Two play-offs by Stockport County.[24]

Colchester United
On 9 October 2008, he was appointed as manager of League One team Colchester United to succeed Geraint Williams,[25] before winning his first game 2–1 at Stockport County. Despite occasionally threatening to flirt with the League One play-offs, the U's eventually finished mid-table in Lambert's first season.

On 18 August 2009, he began the 2009–10 season with an opening day 7–1 win over Norwich City before leaving the Essex club less than a year after taking over.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Richard E on January 15, 2015, 04:19:37 PM
I notice the way he characterises it as a protest solely against Lerner!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on January 15, 2015, 04:26:50 PM
I'll compromise and if we're doing rubbish leave with 8 minutes to go.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 15, 2015, 04:40:25 PM
Jam tomorrow won't wash anymore Paul, we need to start seeing some performances NOW.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Small Rodent on January 15, 2015, 04:50:58 PM
"Whoever has planned it, I hope the guy next to them tries to keep them on their seat."

That'll really be helpful for harmony.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 15, 2015, 04:54:40 PM
"Whoever has planned it, I hope the guy next to them tries to keep them on their seat."

That'll really be helpful for harmony.

But they won't be on their seat to stop Paul remember.... the protest, the one where people don't go to their seats.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: not3bad on January 15, 2015, 04:59:22 PM
You've got to feel a bit sorry for Carles Gil in all this. How will he feel if he runs out to an empty stadium on Saturday.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: montague on January 15, 2015, 05:05:13 PM
He seems to think its all about Lerner and not him as well.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Monty on January 15, 2015, 05:10:55 PM
I sympathise with him. If it's just a protest against him, then it's a protest against his ability to win football matches. This, he's right, will not help our ability to win this football match. I think it's counter-productive.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 15, 2015, 05:17:03 PM
I sympathise with him too. Somebody by now should really have put him out of his misery.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: MoetVillan on January 15, 2015, 05:18:10 PM
Im just going to protest against Liverpool.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ez on January 15, 2015, 05:52:46 PM
Lambert is harming the club much more than any fan protest could ever do.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: peter w on January 15, 2015, 05:54:03 PM
The thing is that there is momentum behind discord now. A win would contain it obviously but it really needs sustained improvement because even if contained for a week or two it will come back twice as bad as ever before. As an analogy we are like a hurricane/whirlwind/tornado or whatever, as fans. As has been said there is just a silence in the ground when we are not happy. This is the eye of the storm. Once you've pushed past silence you get the shitstorm. And that is where we're heading next. Lambert has until saturday to avert it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: levico on January 15, 2015, 06:16:06 PM
The thing is that there is momentum behind discord now. A win would contain it obviously but it really needs sustained improvement because even if contained for a week or two it will come back twice as bad as ever before. As an analogy we are like a hurricane/whirlwind/tornado or whatever, as fans. As has been said there is just a silence in the ground when we are not happy. This is the eye of the storm. Once you've pushed past silence you get the shitstorm. And that is where we're heading next. Lambert has until saturday to avert it.
Absolutely. I think there is every chance that we will see another 3 PL defeats on the trot plus another cup dumping by Bournemouth. The storm will reach positively hurricane force by then.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pete3206 on January 15, 2015, 06:19:18 PM
You've got to feel a bit sorry for Carles Gil in all this. How will he feel if he runs out to an empty stadium on Saturday.

I'm sure he'll soon get used to it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 15, 2015, 06:20:17 PM
For me, the worry is we pick up one decent result in that run of 4 which just resets the clock for another dozen games of shite
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: CJ on January 15, 2015, 06:23:58 PM
The man is completely deluded - "I guess now they are waiting for something to go wrong". Unbelievable. The reason the peasants are revolting, Paul, is that so much has gone wrong over recent years. You've broken practically every negative record in the club's history and we've just had enough
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 15, 2015, 06:27:26 PM
Are the Liverpool players going to wear black armbands for us?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ez on January 15, 2015, 08:12:05 PM
The thing is that there is momentum behind discord now. A win would contain it obviously but it really needs sustained improvement because even if contained for a week or two it will come back twice as bad as ever before. As an analogy we are like a hurricane/whirlwind/tornado or whatever, as fans. As has been said there is just a silence in the ground when we are not happy. This is the eye of the storm. Once you've pushed past silence you get the shitstorm. And that is where we're heading next. Lambert has until saturday to avert it.

And to make matters worse for him the 'easier' games are over and the harder ones are up next.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: myf on January 15, 2015, 08:13:47 PM
The man is completely deluded - "I guess now they are waiting for something to go wrong". Unbelievable. The reason the peasants are revolting, Paul, is that so much has gone wrong over recent years. You've broken practically every negative record in the club's history and we've just had enough

Couldn't believe it when I read that.  He comes across as a terrible communicator in press cons, and doubt it's any different with team talks and tactics
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ez on January 15, 2015, 08:44:38 PM
Lambert's already got his excuse for a defeat 2 days before the game.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ROBBO on January 15, 2015, 10:03:57 PM
I can sympathise with Lambert in one respect and that is that he has been financially restricted for the last three years, he has on the whole bought well and it would have been interesting to see how he would have got on with a bigger purse but balance that against his persistance in playing narrow, only having one game plan and setting negative records that will last a lifetime he really has to go.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 15, 2015, 10:44:38 PM
http://www.espnfc.co.uk/club/aston-villa/362/blog/post/2245693/unrest-and-protest-overshadows-villa-park
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 16, 2015, 12:48:50 AM
The problem is even if he had a budget to buy every player in the Sanchez/Okore price range and higher what many are struggling to see is would he have got them to play well together? The good players are playing well below their capabilities. It simply isn't because of the Bennett/Luna/Tonev level punts. The problem is much deeper than that.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Risso on January 16, 2015, 12:54:05 AM
He's as deluded as McLeish was, and has been saying the exact same things for three years.

"I'm not happy with the way we're playing, I don't like the criticism but won't walk away, we go again...."  ZZzzzzzzzzzz.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 16, 2015, 12:58:13 AM
As for the protest, if some fans want to show their displeasure at things, as long as it is peaceful then so be it. I would rather they didn't at the risk of affecting the team but something has to give.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: tomd2103 on January 16, 2015, 01:05:39 AM
Im just going to protest against Liverpool.

I'm with you.  The decision to award that prize to their theatre over our library was a shocker. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 16, 2015, 06:57:01 AM
Now the media have got hold of this I see no option than for those who have planned it now execute it . Question is how many are in ?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: mr underhill on January 16, 2015, 07:40:35 AM
my guess is only a few more than our goals scored tally
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: peter w on January 16, 2015, 08:10:30 AM
I doubt it will materialise into a full boycotting of the game for the 8 minutes by many fans, but I also doubt that our performance will stave off fans criticising Lambert.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on January 16, 2015, 08:34:28 AM
Im just going to protest against Liverpool.

I'm with you.  The decision to award that prize to their theatre over our library was a shocker. 

And their accent. It got so bad, I used to watch the Liver Birds with the sound turned off.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: nick harper on January 16, 2015, 09:04:56 AM
By encouraging the fans not protest, he has actually drawn even more attention to it. It's made the back page of The Times today. It doesn't matter what happens with the protest now, the spotlight is firmly on him and his record.

Given the run of fixtures, I expect this will intensify in the next 2/3 weeks.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 16, 2015, 09:06:16 AM
By encouraging the fans not protest, he has actually drawn even more attention to it. It's made the back page of The Times today. It doesn't matter what happens with the protest now, the spotlight is firmly on him and his record.

Given the run of fixtures, I expect this will intensify in the next 2/3 weeks.

are you trying to cheer me up? Its worked
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 16, 2015, 09:08:21 AM
Im just going to protest against Liverpool.

I'm with you.  The decision to award that prize to their theatre over our library was a shocker. 

And their accent. It got so bad, I used to watch the Liver Birds with the sound turned off.

I use to watch the Liver birds with the telly off.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 16, 2015, 09:11:39 AM
Now the spotlight is on, we will batter Liverpool, score a few goals and the press will go "what are these lot on about?", before turning their attention to something else.

We then go back to being pap.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 16, 2015, 01:08:34 PM
Now the spotlight is on, we will batter Liverpool, score a few goals and the press will go "what are these lot on about?", before turning their attention to something else.

We then go back to being pap.

I'll take that first bit
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 16, 2015, 01:13:51 PM
As for the protest, if some fans want to show their displeasure at things, as long as it is peaceful then so be it. I would rather they didn't at the risk of affecting the team but something has to give.
To be honest, if you pay your money and you are in the ground, then you can do what you like.
I think its unfair that people who do not attend (for whatever reason) should pass comment on those supporters who may be showing their concerns. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: olaftab on January 16, 2015, 01:18:10 PM
The planned protest has received lot of publicity at both local and  National level by the Press. I think it has achieved it's purpose so I would urge the organisors to call it off now as either way it will not be good.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: peter w on January 16, 2015, 01:19:16 PM
Yeah, agree with that.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: olaftab on January 16, 2015, 01:21:52 PM
For me, the worry is we pick up one decent result in that run of 4 which just resets the clock for another dozen games of shite
I will start with the decent result  and take that and than worry about the next 4.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: tomd2103 on January 16, 2015, 01:23:21 PM
As for the protest, if some fans want to show their displeasure at things, as long as it is peaceful then so be it. I would rather they didn't at the risk of affecting the team but something has to give.
To be honest, if you pay your money and you are in the ground, then you can do what you like.I think its unfair that people who do not attend (for whatever reason) should pass comment on those supporters who may be showing their concerns.

Can you?  I seem to remember some banners asking for the removal of McLeish during his tenure being quickly taken down by stewards.  It will be interesting to see what happens if any banners decrying Lmabert are unfurled tomorrow. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: adrenachrome on January 16, 2015, 01:24:45 PM
TalkShite - Exclusive - Given pleads with Aston Villa fans: 'We need you behind us' (http://talksport.com/football/exclusive-given-pleads-aston-villa-fans-we-need-you-behind-us-150116132558)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 16, 2015, 01:27:36 PM
Yes, I see how that reads.
I didn't mean you can do what you like in that way. I meant you can decide whether you want to join in or not.

That said, I do think the 'protest' is set up to fail, but at least it has raised the profile of peoples concerns.
 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 16, 2015, 01:28:05 PM
As for the protest, if some fans want to show their displeasure at things, as long as it is peaceful then so be it. I would rather they didn't at the risk of affecting the team but something has to give.
To be honest, if you pay your money and you are in the ground, then you can do what you like.I think its unfair that people who do not attend (for whatever reason) should pass comment on those supporters who may be showing their concerns.

Can you?  I seem to remember some banners asking for the removal of McLeish during his tenure being quickly taken down by stewards.  It will be interesting to see what happens if any banners decrying Lmabert are unfurled tomorrow. 

I can see both sides of that. Yes, you should be allowed to protest but if your banners are causing the sort of scenes we had a bit of at Leicester last week then it becomes a public order issue.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 16, 2015, 02:05:04 PM
I can sympathise with Lambert in one respect and that is that he has been financially restricted for the last three years, he has on the whole bought well and it would have been interesting to see how he would have got on with a bigger purse but balance that against his persistance in playing narrow, only having one game plan and setting negative records that will last a lifetime he really has to go.


Maybe he should stick to scouting with another team because he can't manage.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 16, 2015, 02:22:25 PM
As for the protest, if some fans want to show their displeasure at things, as long as it is peaceful then so be it. I would rather they didn't at the risk of affecting the team but something has to give.
To be honest, if you pay your money and you are in the ground, then you can do what you like.
I think its unfair that people who do not attend (for whatever reason) should pass comment on those supporters who may be showing their concerns. 

I hope that isn't directed at me. As I said if people feel they need to make their feelings known they should in a peaceful way. Passing comment shouldn't be reserved to those only going to games, and especially not on an internet message board where we discuss all and sundry from the comfort of a keyboard.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 16, 2015, 02:42:26 PM

I think its unfair that people who do not attend (for whatever reason) should pass comment on those supporters who may be showing their concerns. 

Why is it? I've been to about 10 games so far this season but am not going tomorrow due to finances. Does that mean I can't give my opinion on the protest if I want to?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 16, 2015, 03:14:07 PM
As for the protest, if some fans want to show their displeasure at things, as long as it is peaceful then so be it. I would rather they didn't at the risk of affecting the team but something has to give.
To be honest, if you pay your money and you are in the ground, then you can do what you like.
I think its unfair that people who do not attend (for whatever reason) should pass comment on those supporters who may be showing their concerns. 

I hope that isn't directed at me. As I said if people feel they need to make their feelings known they should in a peaceful way. Passing comment shouldn't be reserved to those only going to games, and especially not on an internet message board where we discuss all and sundry from the comfort of a keyboard.
No mate, it was definitely NOT aimed at you. Apologies if it came over like that.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 16, 2015, 03:16:36 PM
I think anyone can give their comment on the protest.
I just don't think any should comment on the people who will be doing the protesting (or not, as the case may be).
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 16, 2015, 04:37:23 PM
As for the protest, if some fans want to show their displeasure at things, as long as it is peaceful then so be it. I would rather they didn't at the risk of affecting the team but something has to give.
To be honest, if you pay your money and you are in the ground, then you can do what you like.
I think its unfair that people who do not attend (for whatever reason) should pass comment on those supporters who may be showing their concerns. 

I hope that isn't directed at me. As I said if people feel they need to make their feelings known they should in a peaceful way. Passing comment shouldn't be reserved to those only going to games, and especially not on an internet message board where we discuss all and sundry from the comfort of a keyboard.
No mate, it was definitely NOT aimed at you. Apologies if it came over like that.

Thanks Andy
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: mr woo on January 16, 2015, 04:56:58 PM
On talksport this morning they had the definite impression the protest was against Lerner and not aimed at the management/coaching at all.

Has something been lost in getting the message across or have I got the wrong end of the stick? I thought it was mostly Lambert and his crappy football we were all pissed off with?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Richard E on January 16, 2015, 05:00:44 PM
On talksport this morning they had the definite impression the protest was against Lerner and not aimed at the management/coaching at all.

Has something been lost in getting the message across or have I got the wrong end of the stick? I thought it was mostly Lambert and his crappy football we were all pissed off with?

Lambert's comments spun it as a protest against Lerner and the media have evidently swallowed that line.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 16, 2015, 05:02:25 PM
If it is being positioned as this 8 minute thing then isn't against Lerner more so than specifically the current situation?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 16, 2015, 05:11:09 PM
If it is being positioned as this 8 minute thing then isn't against Lerner more so than specifically the current situation?

It's not really a shock that they can't even make it clear what the protest is about. That's aimed at the ones organising it rather than those taking part who know what they want to protest about.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 16, 2015, 05:14:44 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Comrade Blitz on January 16, 2015, 05:15:01 PM
Are Ted and Dougal in charge of the protest now?

(http://seriouslyhilary.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/down-with-this-sort-of-thing.jpg)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 16, 2015, 05:15:46 PM
Are Ted and Dougal in charge of the protest now?

(http://seriouslyhilary.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/down-with-this-sort-of-thing.jpg)

Careful now!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 16, 2015, 05:19:38 PM
(http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Best_17da06_1822677.jpg)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 16, 2015, 05:34:30 PM
Looks like all this talk of  a protest has served it's purpose as the club are acutely aware of it and so are the media which wasn't the case prior to Leicester.
We all want the best result on and off the pitch I think this week will result in the team reacting, let's hope it's positive.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Legion on January 16, 2015, 07:09:12 PM
(http://lolsnaps.com/upload_pic/4013.jpg)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 16, 2015, 07:23:46 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Comrade Blitz on January 16, 2015, 07:55:39 PM
Ooh!!

Can we have a poll?

"What did/do you think the protest is about?"
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 16, 2015, 08:03:32 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.

I agree.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 16, 2015, 08:44:01 PM
I watched the press conference. It was portrayed to Lambert by the questioner as a protest for 8 minutes one for each year of Lerners ownership. Lambert didnt need to address anything about himself or the teams recent results as it was not raised as part of the protest.

Spoilered my reaction to avoid offending folks who are genuinely taking this protest seriously.

I did find it entertaining, imagining the organizers screaming at the TV "noo, nooooo! THATS not what we are protesting about! Its Himmm! noo, not that one, THAT ONE! Hiiiiimmm! :)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 16, 2015, 08:48:28 PM
Ooh!!

Can we have a poll?

"What did/do you think the protest is about?"
I think it's pretty basic stuff to have a general idea what it is we're pissed off with before we start.
My understanding from talking to Villa fans at games is that Lambert's management of the team is the most obvious/urgent concern and needs to be aired. Where and when appropriate - in the stadium, immediately after the game.
The Lerner thing is much more complex and needs a different, more considered approach, imho.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: cdward on January 16, 2015, 08:56:19 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.
I think giving Lambert the 4 year deal links the anger towards Lerner for not giving a f*** about our Villa, and the ineptitude of Lambert.
It's a very bleak outlook, so I can understand why people are not happy and are prepared to protest.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Legion on January 16, 2015, 08:59:33 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.

Same for me.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 16, 2015, 09:01:22 PM
Ooh!!

Can we have a poll?

"What did/do you think the protest is about?"
I think it's pretty basic stuff to have a general idea what it is we're pissed off with before we start.
My understanding from talking to Villa fans at games is that Lambert's management of the team is the most obvious/urgent concern and needs to be aired. Where and when appropriate - in the stadium, immediately after the game.
The Lerner thing is much more complex and needs a different, more considered approach, imho.
totally agree it's Lambert's basic management 'skills' that need addressing,another example is Grealish playing for the under 21's tonight (losing 2-0 to Stoke) .He obviously isn't featuring tomorrow ,and Robinson who is also playing tonight.Lambert is regressing our squad !
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 16, 2015, 09:03:00 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.
I think giving Lambert the 4 year deal links the anger towards Lerner for not giving a f*** about our Villa, and the ineptitude of Lambert.
It's a very bleak outlook, so I can understand why people are not happy and are prepared to protest.

It's a very tenuous link - You gave the manager a new contract, therefore you don't care.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 16, 2015, 09:05:05 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.what do you suggest we do Dave,serious question.

Same for me.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 16, 2015, 09:07:01 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.what do you suggest we do Dave,serious question.

Same for me.

Assuming that's meant for me, you can do whatever you want. Just don't expect me to agree with it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 16, 2015, 09:08:43 PM
Shit fucked up the quote thing! (second bottle of cabernet sauvignon),what would you suggest as a protest Dave ?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 16, 2015, 09:09:06 PM
They've made a bit of a pig's ear of this protest. They haven't made it clear what they are protesting against, or what they want the results of their protests to be. Which to me, kind of defeats the point of protesting.
It's one of the reasons why the £ sign was successful, no one was in any doubt what it was about.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: olaftab on January 16, 2015, 09:11:02 PM
Shit fucked up the quote thing! (second bottle of cabernet sauvignon),what would you suggest as a protest Dave ?
Have another glass.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 16, 2015, 09:12:41 PM
I can only presume that they're directing their angst towards Lerner in the hope that he'll either plough more money in or sack Lambert. I think......
Which is pretty much how I read it.


But...MY protest is the inept way in which Lambert has deployed the players available to him.
So, the 8 minute thing doesn't do it for me.
I think giving Lambert the 4 year deal links the anger towards Lerner for not giving a f*** about our Villa, and the ineptitude of Lambert.
It's a very bleak outlook, so I can understand why people are not happy and are prepared to protest.
I understand, absolutely.
But, imho, Lerner is too distant (and perhaps not particularly interested) at the moment. A really effective protest to the owner needs to be organised to create maximum effect.

Lambert (& Fox?), and what he is doing with a team/squad that I think we all know should be doing so much better with decent organisation, are what we have a much more direct link to. 
Lambert is there. Fox is there (representing his boss, Lerner). The players are there. We are there.
I will support my team throughout the game because I want to encourage us to win. I'll let my dissatisfaction with the manager be known after the game.

I haven't done it yet - last Saturday I was shocked into silence by how poor we were - but I will tomorrow.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 16, 2015, 09:14:26 PM
Shit fucked up the quote thing! (second bottle of cabernet sauvignon),what would you suggest as a protest Dave ?
Have another glass.

good idea,Merlo I think ;-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 16, 2015, 09:16:28 PM
Good job i'm not pissed so as I can fix your quoting!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 16, 2015, 09:41:21 PM
Cheers! hic !
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: LTA on January 16, 2015, 09:44:41 PM
Well I'm going tomorrow and I will watch for 90 minutes.  If anyone wants to do this protest then good luck to them, but ID rather do protest after the game.  I don't like the managers tactics, but I'll support them for the whole game.

No doubt if we score in the first 8 minutes then people will start scurrying back in.  It'll probably be the first time a football crowd has chanted "we can see you sneaking in".
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: IAmTheOneIanOlney on January 16, 2015, 09:44:50 PM
They've made a bit of a pig's ear of this protest. They haven't made it clear what they are protesting against, or what they want the results of their protests to be. Which to me, kind of defeats the point of protesting.
It's one of the reasons why the £ sign was successful, no one was in any doubt what it was about.
Yeah, bit worried it's all going to be a bit of a mess. But if there's no objective, suppose you can't defeat the object...
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: VillaAlways on January 16, 2015, 10:17:57 PM
Is this a protest for just the Holte end or can the other stands take part ?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 16, 2015, 10:21:15 PM
Is this a protest for just the Holte end or can the other stands take part ?
Which is another confusing bit of the protest.
K**k knows!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pete3206 on January 16, 2015, 10:21:30 PM
Seriously VillaAlways? You can do whatever you like.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 16, 2015, 10:24:47 PM
Sorry:
F**k knows!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 16, 2015, 11:16:40 PM
Talksport will get interesting in a minute.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 16, 2015, 11:25:41 PM
Why wouldn't you tell them you're 64?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 16, 2015, 11:27:32 PM
Was it just how it seemed to me or when you were saying the last bit that basically criticised what the PL has become they didn't seem as interested?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 16, 2015, 11:32:10 PM
Was it just how it seemed to me or when you were saying the last bit that basically criticised what the PL has become they didn't seem as interested?

Yes, they did seem to move off the subject rather quickly.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: IAmTheOneIanOlney on January 16, 2015, 11:36:50 PM
Seemed to be an audible tut from Bobby Gould when PL's inconsistency was raised. Managers' union...
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Witton Warrior on January 17, 2015, 12:20:09 AM
Is this a protest for just the Holte end or can the other stands take part ?

As written earlier in the thread the Witton Warrior One Man Show will be held Upper Trinity by the A1 stairs next to the betting booth

Bring your own pint ;-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: adrenachrome on January 17, 2015, 12:34:12 AM
Seemed to be an audible tut from Bobby Gould when PL's inconsistency was raised. Managers' union...

An inaudible tut on the radio would be some accomplishment.

Gould is the resident moron on Talk Shite, a considerable achievement in all honesty when you consider the competition. Most of the time he is giggling like a demented village idiot.   
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Jim Shoes on January 17, 2015, 01:01:13 AM
Well I'm going tomorrow and I will watch for 90 minutes.  If anyone wants to do this protest then good luck to them, but ID rather do protest after the game.  I don't like the managers tactics, but I'll support them for the whole game.

No doubt if we score in the first 8 minutes then people will start scurrying back in.  It'll probably be the first time a football crowd has chanted "we can see you sneaking in".

I will piss myself laughing if that were to happen, please Villa score within the 1st 5mins....................ain't gonna happen though :(
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: villan1975 on January 17, 2015, 01:11:50 AM
So let me get this right, the protest is directed at Lerner to leave even though he has intimated that he would like to sell up and leave. Lerner does need to be gone, the most mind boggling completely unexplainable thing of this and any season is the extension of Lamberts contract. That really is the head scratcher for me and up there with the appointment of TSM.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 17, 2015, 02:02:06 AM
So let me get this right, the protest is directed at Lerner to leave even though he has intimated that he would like to sell up and leave.

Yes. As the VillaReview pair were saying this week. If you held a "Lerner out" rally he would join in. If he could be bothered. He already wants to go.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Chinchilla Bathhouse on January 17, 2015, 02:17:12 AM
The problem with protests like this one is that the emotions that make them necessary – the overwhelming frustration, anger and desperation many of us feel – are exactly the sort of emotions that lead to poor judgment and ill-conceived ideas.  It’s sort of perverse but planning a successful angry protest requires a dispassionate and detached approach.  Otherwise you end up with something like this farce, an idea so half-baked it’s still runny in the middle.

And I’d say that’s being kind.  I’m going to have to assume (as I’m not entirely sure) that the immediate aim of this Huge, Pointed Lateness is to oust Lambert from his dugout.  In which case, I think whoever mooted this protest could barely have done a worse job; it’s muddled, contradictory and objectionable, and it’s so far off target I wonder if Tonev has had more influence than we realise. 

Making the completely spurious “eight minutes” its focus takes all the attention away from the really pertinent issues at hand and plays straight into the hands of our detractors, and alienates people whose support and influence will be essential if Lambert is to be sent packing.

It gives opposition fans and media the chance to accuse us of ungratefulness, to justifiably point at the enormous amount of money Lerner’s poured in over eight years, to brand us fickle again, to suggest we have a sense of entitlement, that we want the moon on a stick. 

It forces lazy pundits to have a cursory glance over our record of the last eight years and draw the obvious and correct conclusion that Lambert’s had relatively little to spend.     

It attacks Randy (the man with the power to grant the protestors’ wish), giving him a reason to assume that it’s mostly about money (it can’t be about Lambert, otherwise they’d be targeting him wouldn’t they?  Surely the mass entrance would be on the symbolic nil minutes).  In which case, it gives him too cause to deem us ungrateful, maybe even to dig his heels in.  (I have no idea what his mindset is, but I do know that slagging someone off unfairly is not usually a good way of getting them to do what you want).  And he’s trying to sell anyway, we know that.  We want him out, so does he.  What are we, thick? 

And, most ridiculously of all (if ousting Lambert is the aim), it deflects blame from Lambert.  It paints him a victim of mitigating circumstances and throws the spotlight off his management and onto his chairman.  He must be bloody delighted.  Way to go, organisers!  What next?  A plan to rid the world of Dairylea Triangles by telling everyone that Laughing Cow is poisonous?   

And that’s just the eight-minute thing; that’s without even mentioning vacuous statements like “We want our Villa back”, a deluded plea that is so ambiguous it ultimately means nothing at all.  If Spurs fans came out with that we’d have a thread to mock them.  What Villa is this we want back?  If it’s any Villa, I’ll have the one of the late 1800s; plenty of success, and Chelsea didn’t exist. As campaign slogans go, it’s toothless.  It’s merely a set-up, waiting for rival fans to provide the punchline. 

Protests during matches always divide opinion (and, as we’ve seen, cause confrontation) so the whole issue is thorny.  I do see a need for a demonstration of some sort and share a lot of the concerns, but the debate surrounding this idea shows that it is surely too flaky to have the desired effect.  I may be proved wrong, but rather than a rousing show of solidarity for a common cause I’m expecting a pitiful and probably tetchy display which sends out the confusing message that the Villa fans are very cross about something but they haven’t quite agreed on what it is yet.  If it wasn’t so embarrassing I’d probably be amused by the irony that a campaign to oust a poor manager was so poorly managed. 

Before anyone shoots me down for slagging this protest off without offering any constructive alternative, here’s my constructive alternative:

Support the team loudly, passionately and as vociferously as you have ever done, for ninety-odd minutes, and make Villa Park bounce, whatever the result, whatever the performance.  Have every journalist, every away fan, every pundit and every television viewer looking on and thinking our brilliant support deserves so much better than we’ve been getting.  The press are already starting to see that, and if things go on as they are, the pressure will eventually take its toll.  Something has to give.  It would be a relief if it did.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: villan1975 on January 17, 2015, 02:27:59 AM
I have no idea what the answer is and to be fair I haven't been to Villa Park for about 20 months and I genuinely do miss it but without stating the obvious Lambert is an awful manager and Lerner as "custodian" of the club needs to near as damn it give it away so we can move on.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ciggiesnbeer on January 17, 2015, 03:15:13 AM
snip good stuff

Dropping some truth bombs right there.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: claret and blue blood on January 17, 2015, 07:38:00 AM
The problem with protests like this one is that the emotions that make them necessary – the overwhelming frustration, anger and desperation many of us feel – are exactly the sort of emotions that lead to poor judgment and ill-conceived ideas.  It’s sort of perverse but planning a successful angry protest requires a dispassionate and detached approach.  Otherwise you end up with something like this farce, an idea so half-baked it’s still runny in the middle.

And I’d say that’s being kind.  I’m going to have to assume (as I’m not entirely sure) that the immediate aim of this Huge, Pointed Lateness is to oust Lambert from his dugout.  In which case, I think whoever mooted this protest could barely have done a worse job; it’s muddled, contradictory and objectionable, and it’s so far off target I wonder if Tonev has had more influence than we realise. 

Making the completely spurious “eight minutes” its focus takes all the attention away from the really pertinent issues at hand and plays straight into the hands of our detractors, and alienates people whose support and influence will be essential if Lambert is to be sent packing.

It gives opposition fans and media the chance to accuse us of ungratefulness, to justifiably point at the enormous amount of money Lerner’s poured in over eight years, to brand us fickle again, to suggest we have a sense of entitlement, that we want the moon on a stick. 

It forces lazy pundits to have a cursory glance over our record of the last eight years and draw the obvious and correct conclusion that Lambert’s had relatively little to spend.     

It attacks Randy (the man with the power to grant the protestors’ wish), giving him a reason to assume that it’s mostly about money (it can’t be about Lambert, otherwise they’d be targeting him wouldn’t they?  Surely the mass entrance would be on the symbolic nil minutes).  In which case, it gives him too cause to deem us ungrateful, maybe even to dig his heels in.  (I have no idea what his mindset is, but I do know that slagging someone off unfairly is not usually a good way of getting them to do what you want).  And he’s trying to sell anyway, we know that.  We want him out, so does he.  What are we, thick? 

And, most ridiculously of all (if ousting Lambert is the aim), it deflects blame from Lambert.  It paints him a victim of mitigating circumstances and throws the spotlight off his management and onto his chairman.  He must be bloody delighted.  Way to go, organisers!  What next?  A plan to rid the world of Dairylea Triangles by telling everyone that Laughing Cow is poisonous?   

And that’s just the eight-minute thing; that’s without even mentioning vacuous statements like “We want our Villa back”, a deluded plea that is so ambiguous it ultimately means nothing at all.  If Spurs fans came out with that we’d have a thread to mock them.  What Villa is this we want back?  If it’s any Villa, I’ll have the one of the late 1800s; plenty of success, and Chelsea didn’t exist. As campaign slogans go, it’s toothless.  It’s merely a set-up, waiting for rival fans to provide the punchline. 

Protests during matches always divide opinion (and, as we’ve seen, cause confrontation) so the whole issue is thorny.  I do see a need for a demonstration of some sort and share a lot of the concerns, but the debate surrounding this idea shows that it is surely too flaky to have the desired effect.  I may be proved wrong, but rather than a rousing show of solidarity for a common cause I’m expecting a pitiful and probably tetchy display which sends out the confusing message that the Villa fans are very cross about something but they haven’t quite agreed on what it is yet.  If it wasn’t so embarrassing I’d probably be amused by the irony that a campaign to oust a poor manager was so poorly managed. 

Before anyone shoots me down for slagging this protest off without offering any constructive alternative, here’s my constructive alternative:

Support the team loudly, passionately and as vociferously as you have ever done, for ninety-odd minutes, and make Villa Park bounce, whatever the result, whatever the performance.  Have every journalist, every away fan, every pundit and every television viewer looking on and thinking our brilliant support deserves so much better than we’ve been getting.  The press are already starting to see that, and if things go on as they are, the pressure will eventually take its toll.  Something has to give.  It would be a relief if it did.
so you're not keen then :-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ron Manager on January 17, 2015, 08:45:53 AM
If there are few protesting say 30 to 60 it is going to look bad. The media will have a field day with pictures of youths waving their hands about and holding a bedsheet with 'Learner out' hastily painted on it.

Lads as a bare minimum make sure you spell his name right.

I shall certainly be protesting. Probably about the cold!

I blame Michael Fish.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dave on January 17, 2015, 08:56:08 AM
snip good stuff

Dropping some truth bombs right there.
Absolutely, very nicely put
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: simboy on January 17, 2015, 09:04:05 AM
Am i pissed off by the chairman and the governing structure of the business? Yes, but as a fan that isn't my point of main frustration.

like many on here i work hard for [most of] the week. I want to do something with my "leisure time" that i enjoy.

I want Lambert gone, i want to see some entertainment for my money, i certainly don't want another Ellis style fiefdom in place at board level... unless it brings total success of course... I doubt many Chelsea fans worry overly much about their Chairman, how he got his money etc - they are more concerned about the trophies.

So i want to protest, i want my feelings and frustrations to be added to the common collective. After the game i will tell Lambert what i think about him. But i see this 8 minute thing as a misconceived idea. Brilliant if we were protesting against the balls-up Sky have made at a full-on televised game, but not here to achieve the objective i want.



     
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: peter w on January 17, 2015, 09:04:56 AM
The nub of it for me has been mentioned. That the 8th minute thing misses the point. Yes I think just about all of us want Lerner replaced but even if an Arab billionaire was to take over I doubt Lambert would produce a team capable of much more than this. If Lambert goes and Lerner is still here I'd expect many managers would be able to do more with the players we currently have.

The team is packed full of current internationals and as a team should be top 8 at least. That's the only thing that has any links to this 8th minute thing for me. We can't fight to change the owner. There's either someone willing to buy or there isn't. We definitely can influence the managerial situation though. For those going and seriously considering doing this I'd just urge you to think of the battle that we can try and win. Lambert must go. That is clear. Lets make it clearer and not bother with 8 minute protests but be vociferous in our dislike for Lambert.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 17, 2015, 09:10:18 AM
Last Saturday was very vocal against lambert . The fans have turned. Anymore crap today and lambert will get it again as he will every week he churns out turgid shit.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 17, 2015, 09:29:54 AM
I absolutely agree that this proposed 'protest' has missed the point and should be clearly against the manager not the chairman, who wants out anyway.
But, if things aren't going our way today, I think there is still too much apathy around for an outburst against Lambert.
For a start there will be too many half and halfers.
Then,  there will be a great many who will use the old augment that we shouldn't expect to be beating the 'big boys' anyway.
I think it will be the usual collective shrug and sigh as people traipse out of the stadium, trying to get back to the warm as quickly as possible.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 17, 2015, 09:32:59 AM
Agree today was a bad choice to hold a protest. Wrong opposition , wrong demographic in the stadium etc
Stoke at home is the better option as it will be half empty anyway.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Nastylee on January 17, 2015, 09:46:12 AM
I reckon it will pass with hardly anyone noticing. I predict a damp squib. I just hope those supporting the team aren't harassed for their choice. Personally, I would prefer any protests to be outside game time.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy65 on January 17, 2015, 09:46:41 AM
If nothing else this protest has got media attention. Guys I work with who have only a passing interest in footy have mentioned it. 5 Live and Pat Murphy similarly have given it some coverage, albeit, not as much as continually talking about Arsenal's shite defence.

For the first time ever Lamber is feeling it from the media. This has to be good if nothing else.

If we are losing and playing badly after 30 mins the atmosphere could get nasty
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Witton Warrior on January 17, 2015, 09:50:09 AM
I just hope those supporting the team aren't harassed for their choice.

How about "I just hope those supporting the demonstration aren't harassed for their choice" - which was my experience at the Bolton match under TSM!

Don't think either will happen
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Nastylee on January 17, 2015, 09:52:22 AM
But as mentioned,  Liverpool (who beat us at home regularly) is not the right game to go toxic. Much better to choose a game that we should be winning, especially since we have games in that category approaching.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Nastylee on January 17, 2015, 09:53:54 AM
I just hope those supporting the team aren't harassed for their choice.

How about "I just hope those supporting the demonstration aren't harassed for their choice" - which was my experience at the Bolton match under TSM!

Don't think either will happen

which is why protests during games should be avoided. They will always divide opinion and prove contentious.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 17, 2015, 10:04:54 AM
Seems the protests are getting as confused as lamberts tactics.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: SamTheMouse on January 17, 2015, 10:07:32 AM
From the Telegraph website:

Quote
Have Villa fans reached tipping point?

If Villa’s 1-0 victory at Anfield in September represents both peak beard and the high watermark of the brief Paul Lambert/Roy Keane partnership the last six winless matches have returned the club to its habitual status under the Scot’s management of joy-sapping, dismal tedium. It’s one thing to lose it’s quite another entirely that your paucity of ambition and ability to entertain seems uniquely designed to dispirit your fans comprehensively, No team in the four divisions has scored fewer league goals. The orchestrated ire of Villa fans who saw off David O’Leary with the unimprovable banner - “we’re not fickle, we just don’t like you” – has been absent in patient understanding of the difficulties Lambert is enduring since Randy Lerner’s disillusionment with the game until now despite plenty of grumbles. But on Saturday a fans’ initiative to leave their seats empty for the first eight minutes of the match, a minute for each of the years of Lerner’s ownership, is scheduled to proceed even if Lambert is desperately trying to persuade them to call it off. It is more important than anything that happens on the pitch and will probably be more rewarding.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 17, 2015, 10:10:36 AM
The only protest you can do for lambert is no fans , just like his no goals totals in matches.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Steve67 on January 17, 2015, 10:10:56 AM
We keep saying this though don't we? Get these next couple of games out of the way and we have easier games to play? We played last year's top six, lost five of them, play QPR etc and lose to them as well. Sunderland, Swansea, Leicester, Palace, to a degree, Blackpool. Not a win or a goal in sight in most games.  Lambert cannot motivate the players. He is the short term problem, protest against him. Lerner is the longer term problem, wants out anyway, so what else can he do for us other than find us a decent Manager? Get a new Manager in, THEN moan about Lerner.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 17, 2015, 10:13:16 AM
And the defeat against our local team who were below us.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pete3206 on January 17, 2015, 10:14:23 AM
If we are losing and playing badly after 30 mins the atmosphere could get nasty

I get the feeling that plenty of people want it to go wrong and therefore 'get nasty'. Their theory being that Lambert will suffer his 'Bolton' moment and get fired. I don't believe this will happen, regardless of today's result. Nor if we get beaten by Bournemouth or thrashed by Arsenal or Chelsea. Despite Lambert's many failings, I don't think he's doing anything less than his absolute best to turn things around. For me, the blame lies squarely about 3,000 miles away, a man who will again be notable by his absence.

Lambert out? Yes, absolutely. But, not today. Today, we should leaving Villa Park with a hoarse throat, having backed the team to a valuable point or maybe even better.

These protests do not achieve anything.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: amfy on January 17, 2015, 10:17:58 AM
The reason I'm not against a protest, is that the fans are divided anyway. Last week at Leicester, when fans were singing 'Villa, Villa!', the bloke next to me was furious - screaming 'Its not Villa though is it? How is this Villa?' - & calling everyone all the names under the sun for joining in. No-one wants to be in a crowd like that any more, people want something definite to happen.

The problem with this protest is that it is muddled in its aims, set up in such a way that it maximises the potential for conflict between fans, and, to top it off, is likely to be completely visually ineffective.

The £ sign protest worked well because you only had to hear about it on the day to be able to join in, it didn't need a massive number of people to join in to be visually effective (although I think a lot did), & then at kick off everyone either threw their papers to the floor or made paper planes out of them, and instantly got right behind the team. Sometimes, the simple ideas are the best.

(Still didn't really achieve anything though)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Chinchilla Bathhouse on January 17, 2015, 10:18:13 AM
I just hope those supporting the team aren't harassed for their choice.

How about "I just hope those supporting the demonstration aren't harassed for their choice" - which was my experience at the Bolton match under TSM!

Don't think either will happen

which is why protests during games should be avoided. They will always divide opinion and prove contentious.

Exactly, and that makes them nowhere near as powerful as simply uniting in passionate support for the team for ninety minutes. Which you would hope everyone could do and no one would find contentious.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 17, 2015, 10:20:06 AM
The reason I'm not against a protest, is that the fans are divided anyway. Last week at Leicester, when fans were singing 'Villa, Villa!', the bloke next to me was furious - screaming 'Its not Villa though is it? How is this Villa?' - & calling everyone all the names under the sun for joining in. No-one wants to be in a crowd like that any more, people want something definite to happen.

The problem with this protest is that it is muddled in its aims, set up in such a way that it maximises the potential for conflict between fans, and, to top it off, is likely to be completely visually ineffective.

The £ sign protest worked well because you only had to hear about it on the day to be able to join in, it didn't need a massive number of people to join in to be visually effective (although I think a lot did), & then at kick off everyone either threw their papers to the floor or made paper planes out of them, and instantly got right behind the team. Sometimes, the simple ideas are the best.

(Still didn't really achieve anything though)

If memory serves me right, wasn't Angel signed just after the £ protests? Correct me if I'm wrong though.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy65 on January 17, 2015, 10:25:52 AM
If we are losing and playing badly after 30 mins the atmosphere could get nasty

I get the feeling that plenty of people want it to go wrong and therefore 'get nasty'. Their theory being that Lambert will suffer his 'Bolton' moment and get fired. I don't believe this will happen, regardless of today's result. Nor if we get beaten by Bournemouth or thrashed by Arsenal or Chelsea. Despite Lambert's many failings, I don't think he's doing anything less than his absolute best to turn things around. For me, the blame lies squarely about 3,000 miles away, a man who will again be notable by his absence.

Lambert out? Yes, absolutely. But, not today. Today, we should leaving Villa Park with a hoarse throat, having backed the team to a valuable point or maybe even better.

These protests do not achieve anything.

So you want him out, but not yet?

How long do you want to give him before its too late for another manager to turn it around?

His 'absolute best' clearly hasn't been good enough for 2.5 years
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Nastylee on January 17, 2015, 10:27:54 AM
Lambert will not be sacked, that is nailed on.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: amfy on January 17, 2015, 10:28:54 AM
Yes I think so Clampy!  So maybe it actually was effective too!

it's just that in retrospect, I tend to think that Doug did whatever he did because he wanted to, not because of anything we did. I also look back now and think how desperate I was back then for a Billionaire to come and spend loads of money on us, and now I think should be careful what I wish for .
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Jimbo on January 17, 2015, 11:25:32 AM
In my Villa supporting life, I've only ever known Villa fans to be united when the team is doing really well, which has been rare, and is getting increasingly rarer.

Seeing as we're unlikely to enjoy success any time soon under this terrible manager, and more importantly, under this detached, disinterested and irresponsible owner, then I fear it'll have to get really bad before there's any chance of Villa fans uniting.

It's a stupid protest, because knowing that not everybody will join in, it will look pathetic. However, that's not to say that I don't support a protest in theory. I do. It just needs to have a single, simple message, and it needs to be simple to execute. Placards and banners seem so much more effective because they're easy to hold up.

Lerner is the target, he has to be. He needs to wake up and see what his woolly-minded detachment is doing to the club. The only reason Lambert is still here is because of him. Only he can sack Lambert; only he can invest properly in the club. Both need to happen if he wants to attract a buyer any time soon.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 17, 2015, 11:28:46 AM
He'll get untold amounts of stick if we lose to Bournemouth next week.

I agree I don't see today becoming quite as toxic. I haven't woke up funny but I actually think we'll play well today and not lose, similar to the Man. United guy before xmas as in these sorts of games we obviously get more space.

Unless it's like Arsenal and we're 3 down in 30 minutes which won't make a pleasant second half for Lambert.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dicedlam on January 17, 2015, 11:29:06 AM

it's just that in retrospect, I tend to think that Doug did whatever he did because he wanted to, not because of anything we did.

This is why I think today's protest is futile and will not solve anything.
I reckon Lerner is just as stubborn as Ellis could be and will not bow down to fans calling for Lambert's head. Lambert know's it too.

It's a mess. The club is in a total mess from top to bottom.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 17, 2015, 11:31:41 AM
I'm not convinced we'd have signed JPA for 9.5m if the pound protest hadn't of occured. That was an reasonably effective protest.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 17, 2015, 11:49:47 AM
I just hope those supporting the team aren't harassed for their choice.

How about "I just hope those supporting the demonstration aren't harassed for their choice" - which was my experience at the Bolton match under TSM!

Don't think either will happen

which is why protests during games should be avoided. They will always divide opinion and prove contentious.

Exactly, and that makes them nowhere near as powerful as simply uniting in passionate support for the team for ninety minutes. Which you would hope everyone could do and no one would find contentious.
Absolutely.
More than ever I think us all getting behind the team 100% today would show the watching media/public where our hearts are.
A similar 100% (or 90% according to the poll on the Lambert thread) protest/calling for Lambert's head immediately after the game would again be much more effective.

As several have already pointed out - Lerner himself wants out and is already trying to sell the club.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Witton Warrior on January 17, 2015, 12:03:41 PM
I just hope those supporting the team aren't harassed for their choice.

How about "I just hope those supporting the demonstration aren't harassed for their choice" - which was my experience at the Bolton match under TSM!

Don't think either will happen

which is why protests during games should be avoided. They will always divide opinion and prove contentious.

I understand that some people do not like dynamic tension and it's potential uncontrollability however there is far too much spurious invalidation of anyone with an opposing idea - people with banners are "youths" (usually "spotty"), those who do not agree with protesting are "sheep" or "pawns" - the revolution will be televised...

;-)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: VillaAlways on January 17, 2015, 12:21:19 PM
I just hope those supporting the team aren't harassed for their choice.

How about "I just hope those supporting the demonstration aren't harassed for their choice" - which was my experience at the Bolton match under TSM!

Don't think either will happen

which is why protests during games should be avoided. They will always divide opinion and prove contentious.

Exactly, and that makes them nowhere near as powerful as simply uniting in passionate support for the team for ninety minutes. Which you would hope everyone could do and no one would find contentious.
Absolutely.
More than ever I think us all getting behind the team 100% today would show the watching media/public where our hearts are.
A similar 100% (or 90% according to the poll on the Lambert thread) protest/calling for Lambert's head immediately after the game would again be much more effective.

As several have already pointed out - Lerner himself wants out and is already trying to sell the club.
He may want out but he's the owner now and responsible for the club now. The fact that he appears happy to have stripped the club of all it's ambition and appears unfazed by the possibility of relegation and not taking appropriate action in sacking Lambert. This is entirely down to Lerner I'm afraid. He should have been sacked at the end of last season as apparently advised by his chief executive but no he managed to detract away from that by announcing putting the club up for sale . It's Lerner who extended his contract. This is all down to him,he is the only one who can do anything about it, the protesters are quite right!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pete3206 on January 17, 2015, 12:34:25 PM
Good post Jimbo
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 17, 2015, 12:51:57 PM
I think it is time we protested and really made ourselves heard. I hope it doesn't turn out to be embarrassingly half hearted or half supported. I also hope it doesn't become divisive amongst the fans. I fear it will be both. The media have picked up on it so they will be watching with interest. The problem is that these situations are usually about getting the owner to pull his finger out or get out. I honestly can't see him doing the former and he is already attempting to do the latter without success.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: CT on January 17, 2015, 03:17:36 PM
Hopes dashed I'm afraid Damo. Holte looked virtually full to me before kick off.

Even Jeff Stelling made a snidey little remark on SSN.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archie on January 17, 2015, 03:18:27 PM
The idea had not success, what a pity, nothing will change then!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Monty on January 17, 2015, 03:19:34 PM
The protest was a bit of a stupid idea. It was all excruciatingly Newcastle.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on January 17, 2015, 03:22:45 PM
Well that went well.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Nastylee on January 17, 2015, 03:53:29 PM
It was always destined to fail.  Hastily put together following the Leicester result. They'd have been better biting their tongue and planning something properly.  Now it looks like it's a minority causing a fuss.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 17, 2015, 03:59:29 PM
Well that was a bit crap, wasn't it?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 17, 2015, 06:52:07 PM
So was it a total washout?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Legion on January 17, 2015, 06:54:12 PM
Yes.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 17, 2015, 06:54:30 PM
we're as inept at protests as we are at football it appears
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Karlos96 on January 17, 2015, 06:55:43 PM
So was it a total washout?

Yep it was was a complete washout.  There were a few around me that did it but you wouldn't have noticed.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: myf on January 17, 2015, 06:58:29 PM
It served it's purpose in media coverage but we're riddled with apathy. Can't believe 39k there today. Prob a load of brummie reds but if you didn't have a ST why pay to watch this garbage?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: tomd2103 on January 17, 2015, 06:59:08 PM
Yes.

Someone called the after game phone in with Tom Ross and said he had take part in the protest.  He was complaining that the TVs in the concourses were turned off while it went on!!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ad@m on January 17, 2015, 06:59:45 PM
So who cancelled the protest then?

Seriously, it was the quietest protest I've ever heard. I know the focus was the 8 minutes empty Holte but surely if you're protesting you'd stand outside the Holte, make a bit of noise and try to spread the word of what you're trying to do?! You'd have thought the protesters would appreciate not every Villa fan reads online forums!

The Holte was fuller at kick off than any other game this season and given the press picked up on the 'protest' beforehand we now look like mugs.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 17, 2015, 07:01:53 PM
Yes.

Someone called the after game phone in with Tom Ross and said he had take part in the protest.  He was complaining that the TVs in the concourses were turned off while it went on!!

That made me loff.

It's no surprise it was a washout with that twat from MOMS involved. The bellend.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 17, 2015, 07:03:31 PM
A proper protest would take more than a couple of days notice as well.

We can't get rid of Lerner, he will go in his own time on his own terms but we could make life difficult for Lambert. We are 100% better off without him so any protest should surely start with the aim of removing this black hole of attacking tactics from Villa Park.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 17, 2015, 07:04:08 PM
Outflanked by the club. Turn the TV's off and everyone goes to their seats
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ad@m on January 17, 2015, 07:06:17 PM
A proper protest would take more than a couple of days notice as well.

We can't get rid of Lerner, he will go in his own time on his own terms but we could make life difficult for Lambert. We are 100% better off without him so any protest should surely start with the aim of removing this black hole of attacking tactics from Villa Park.

Exactly. It was focused in the wrong direction. Lambert's the only viable target for protests.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 17, 2015, 07:07:08 PM
A proper protest would take more than a couple of days notice as well.

We can't get rid of Lerner, he will go in his own time on his own terms but we could make life difficult for Lambert. We are 100% better off without him so any protest should surely start with the aim of removing this black hole of attacking tactics from Villa Park.

They've been planning it for at least 4 days (which is when this thread started). We did the 19th minute in less than a day. I know they are different things but they were ballsing up this protest from the start.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 17, 2015, 07:56:08 PM
Bedsheets with appropriate slogans is what's needed
The media love them
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: hilts_coolerking on January 17, 2015, 08:37:00 PM
A proper protest would take more than a couple of days notice as well.

We can't get rid of Lerner, he will go in his own time on his own terms but we could make life difficult for Lambert. We are 100% better off without him so any protest should surely start with the aim of removing this black hole of attacking tactics from Villa Park.

Exactly. It was focused in the wrong direction. Lambert's the only viable target for protests.
Unfortunately it may be that for Lambert to go Lerner has to go at the same time.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: hilts_coolerking on January 17, 2015, 08:37:37 PM
Bedsheets with appropriate slogans is what's needed
The media love them
Not even a slogan.  A dirty great shit stain would do it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: tomd2103 on January 17, 2015, 10:09:24 PM
A proper protest would take more than a couple of days notice as well.

We can't get rid of Lerner, he will go in his own time on his own terms but we could make life difficult for Lambert. We are 100% better off without him so any protest should surely start with the aim of removing this black hole of attacking tactics from Villa Park.

Exactly. It was focused in the wrong direction. Lambert's the only viable target for protests.
Unfortunately it may be that for Lambert to go Lerner has to go at the same time.

Back of today's Evening Mail stating that there has been some possible interest in the past couple of months.   
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Des Little on January 17, 2015, 10:11:19 PM
We sleepwalk onwards to relegation...
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 17, 2015, 10:23:17 PM
A bed sheet with 0 on it would sum things up nicely.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Hoppo on January 17, 2015, 10:28:55 PM
The protest worked. The National media have been all over us all week.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 17, 2015, 10:33:37 PM
For the wrong reasons. The media think it's aimed at Lerner, what's the point? He wants out. It's he manager who should be doing better.

I was a minute or so late due tithe roadworks. There was about 30 people perhaps in the Upper Holte if that. You get more holding back at away matches having a pint.

It was a half baked idea from an egotist who dared to claim that "he speaks for all the Holte End". Fuck off.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 17, 2015, 10:35:42 PM
For the wrong reasons. The media think it's aimed at Lerner, what's the point? He wants out. It's he manager who should be doing better.

I was a minute or so late due tithe roadworks. There was about 30 people perhaps in the Upper Holte if that. You get more holding back at away matches having a pint.

It was a half baked idea from an egotist who dared to claim that "he speaks for all the Holte End". Fuck off.

In all honesty I didn't see a single name mentioned anywhere. At least Fear, Robathan & Naz stood up.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 17, 2015, 10:39:12 PM
I'm guessing Ads means that twat from MOMS. He seems to have gone very quiet about it for some reason.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ad@m on January 17, 2015, 10:39:56 PM
I'm guessing Ads means that twat from MOMS. He seems to have gone very quiet about it for some reason.

He was on Twitter earlier saying that the only people who'd described it as a protest were in the press!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 17, 2015, 10:41:11 PM
I'm guessing Ads means that twat from MOMS. He seems to have gone very quiet about it for some reason.
Who is that ?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ez on January 17, 2015, 10:42:34 PM
It served it's purpose in media coverage but we're riddled with apathy. Can't believe 39k there today. Prob a load of brummie reds but if you didn't have a ST why pay to watch this garbage?

To see us in the PL while you can. We may be away for a while.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Comrade Blitz on January 17, 2015, 10:42:54 PM
In all honesty I didn't see a single name mentioned anywhere. At least Fear, Robathan & Naz stood up.

FWIW I put the match on NBC Live Extra on my Mac and then left the room. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: cheltenhamlion on January 17, 2015, 10:43:08 PM
He doesn't believe it to be a protest but a demonstration!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 17, 2015, 10:44:23 PM
I'm guessing Ads means that twat from MOMS. He seems to have gone very quiet about it for some reason.

He was on Twitter earlier saying that the only people who'd described it as a protest were in the press!

Good job he didn't do articles calling it a protest then. Oh..........
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 17, 2015, 10:45:06 PM
He doesn't believe it to be a protest but a demonstration!

You like him though Chelts!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 17, 2015, 11:10:50 PM
Who?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 17, 2015, 11:13:41 PM
I'm guessing Ads means that twat from MOMS. He seems to have gone very quiet about it for some reason.

He was on Twitter earlier saying that the only people who'd described it as a protest were in the press!

Good job he didn't do articles calling it a protest then. Oh..........

Aye. He told call me Franksy that he spoke for all the Holte End.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 17, 2015, 11:16:32 PM
The Holte End he loves so much that he thought the reason our LC semi attendance against Oxford in 1986 was shit was because it was being renovated. Obviously a regular at VP in those days........
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 17, 2015, 11:23:05 PM
In all honesty I didn't see a single name mentioned anywhere. At least Fear, Robathan & Naz stood up.

FWIW I put the match on NBC Live Extra on my Mac and then left the room. 

I fired up a stream, waited for it to start, then left the room and boycotted the first 90 minutes.

90 being a symbolic number for me, because it stands for 1990, which seems like the last time I saw us score.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dave on January 17, 2015, 11:57:15 PM
I deliberately timed my drive from Kenilworth back to Bath to take from 2.45pm until 4.45pm.

Solidarity with the MOMS one.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 18, 2015, 12:02:04 AM
I deliberately timed my drive from Kenilworth back to Bath to take from 2.45pm until 4.45pm.

Surely you've got a Waitrose nearer to home than Kenilworth?*





* a joke mostly aimed at middle class Leamington Waitrosistas
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 12:07:55 AM
The Holte End he loves so much that he thought the reason our LC semi attendance against Oxford in 1986 was shit was because it was being renovated. Obviously a regular at VP in those days........

Why was the attendance so bad for that game? Hang on. 1986. Graham Turner. Oxford. I think given time I might be able to get the answer to this one.

I was at both legs by the way. I still have the away programme with Ken Fish on the front to prove it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 12:14:03 AM
The 23,098 attendance for a semi-final was our 4th highest of the season. 2 were 26K and 1 was 27K. Maybe the whole ground was being renovated but no one else noticed?
Then again we only played in front of 30K away from home 3 times (and one of them WASN'T at Anfield). Maybe every ground in the country was being renovated?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 12:14:51 AM
The 23,098 attendance for a semi-final was our 4th highest of the season. 2 were 26K and 1 was 27K. Maybe the whole ground was being renovated but no one else noticed?
Then again we only played in front of 30K away from home 3 times (and one of them WASN'T at Anfield). Maybe every ground in the country was being renovated?

That season was the worst attendances in living memory everywhere.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 12:17:52 AM
I was in the Trinity for the Southampton game when the Holte was shut. As Dave said, it wasn't just us. I'm sure Albion and Small Heath averaged less than 10,000 and I think Spurs and Arsenal might have averaged less than 20,000. Only United, Liverpool and Everton were getting decent crowds.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy65 on January 18, 2015, 12:20:15 AM
The 23,098 attendance for a semi-final was our 4th highest of the season. 2 were 26K and 1 was 27K. Maybe the whole ground was being renovated but no one else noticed?
Then again we only played in front of 30K away from home 3 times (and one of them WASN'T at Anfield). Maybe every ground in the country was being renovated?

So Anfield has less than than 30k for a home games?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 18, 2015, 12:20:42 AM
The Holte End he loves so much that he thought the reason our LC semi attendance against Oxford in 1986 was shit was because it was being renovated. Obviously a regular at VP in those days........

Why was the attendance so bad for that game? Hang on. 1986. Graham Turner. Oxford. I think given time I might be able to get the answer to this one.

I was at both legs by the way. I still have the away programme with Ken Fish on the front to prove it.

I was, too.

That away leg remains the most miserable night ever as a Villa fan. Stood in that glorified fucking cage, feeling the will to live drip away.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 12:24:25 AM
The 23,098 attendance for a semi-final was our 4th highest of the season. 2 were 26K and 1 was 27K. Maybe the whole ground was being renovated but no one else noticed?
Then again we only played in front of 30K away from home 3 times (and one of them WASN'T at Anfield). Maybe every ground in the country was being renovated?

So Anfield has less than than 30k for a home games?

1985-86 League v QPR 26,219, League Cup v Brighton 15,291, Screen Sports Super Cup v Spurs 14,855.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 12:24:33 AM
Wolves averaged 4,000, Albion 12,000, we were 15,000 and small heath were 11,000.

Arsenal 24K, Spurs 21K.

And remember kids, when were winning the European Cup, Chavski were averaging 13K in division 2.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 12:27:06 AM
The 23,098 attendance for a semi-final was our 4th highest of the season. 2 were 26K and 1 was 27K. Maybe the whole ground was being renovated but no one else noticed?
Then again we only played in front of 30K away from home 3 times (and one of them WASN'T at Anfield). Maybe every ground in the country was being renovated?

So Anfield has less than than 30k for a home games?

29,418.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy65 on January 18, 2015, 12:28:14 AM
The 23,098 attendance for a semi-final was our 4th highest of the season. 2 were 26K and 1 was 27K. Maybe the whole ground was being renovated but no one else noticed?
Then again we only played in front of 30K away from home 3 times (and one of them WASN'T at Anfield). Maybe every ground in the country was being renovated?

So Anfield has less than than 30k for a home games?

1985-86 League v QPR 26,219, League Cup v Brighton 15,291, Screen Sports Super Cup v Spurs 14,855.

 Bloody hell. Always assumed Liverpool would have had more than that particularly in the mid 80's
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 12:30:50 AM
I'd forgotten all about that Super Cup for one season.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Cup_(English_football)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 12:32:09 AM
The 23,098 attendance for a semi-final was our 4th highest of the season. 2 were 26K and 1 was 27K. Maybe the whole ground was being renovated but no one else noticed?
Then again we only played in front of 30K away from home 3 times (and one of them WASN'T at Anfield). Maybe every ground in the country was being renovated?

So Anfield has less than than 30k for a home games?

1985-86 League v QPR 26,219, League Cup v Brighton 15,291, Screen Sports Super Cup v Spurs 14,855.


The yoof will think you are making this Screen Sports Super Cup up Dave. Explain it to them and they will be convinced you are making it up.

As someone who was 14/15 at the time did anyone know a pub that showed the games and did anyone go to watch one in the pub?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 12:35:27 AM
Bloody hell. Always assumed Liverpool would have had more than that particularly in the mid 80's

They often got sub 30K attendances. Not that any scouser would admit it!

1983/4 as they won the league again.
Home league games
3rd Dec small heath 24,791
17th Dec Notts Co 22,436
1st Feb Watford 20,746
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 12:37:52 AM
Wolves averaged 4,000, Albion 12,000, we were 15,000 and small heath were 11,000.

Arsenal 24K, Spurs 21K.

And remember kids, when were winning the European Cup, Chavski were averaging 13K in division 2.

I am sure both Small Heath and Albion were down to about 6,500 in the last weeks of the season.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 12:39:23 AM
Amazing that no one apart from the MOMS bloke knew that for years in the 80s every ground in the country was being renovated. The rest of us who were going to games then just thought that it was football dying on its arse. Silly us.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 12:40:43 AM
Bloody hell. Always assumed Liverpool would have had more than that particularly in the mid 80's

They often got sub 30K attendances. Not that any scouser would admit it!

1983/4 as they won the league again.
Home league games
3rd Dec small heath 24,791
17th Dec Notts Co 22,436
1st Feb Watford 20,746

Then Ryanair started flying from Dublin and Oslo.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 12:41:22 AM
Wolves averaged 4,000, Albion 12,000, we were 15,000 and small heath were 11,000.

Arsenal 24K, Spurs 21K.

And remember kids, when were winning the European Cup, Chavski were averaging 13K in division 2.

I am sure both Small Heath and Albion were down to about 6,500 in the last weeks of the season.

In 1989 small heath AVERAGED 6,200. Part of a run of 5 years when their best average was 8,500. I'm not laughing as I type that, honest.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Hoppo on January 18, 2015, 12:50:05 AM
What's with this continual knocking of the MOMs geezer? It was a mistake on his part. It's getting abit boring now.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 12:57:01 AM
Wolves averaged 4,000, Albion 12,000, we were 15,000 and small heath were 11,000.

Arsenal 24K, Spurs 21K.

And remember kids, when were winning the European Cup, Chavski were averaging 13K in division 2.

I am sure both Small Heath and Albion were down to about 6,500 in the last weeks of the season.

In 1989 small heath AVERAGED 6,200. Part of a run of 5 years when their best average was 8,500. I'm not laughing as I type that, honest.



Small Heath 1985-1986


Opening day H West Ham 11,164
Sept            H  Villa         24,971
Oct              H Coventry    9,267
Nov             H Newcastle   8,162
Dec             H Watford      7,043
Jan             H  Ipswich      6,856
Apl             H  Southampton 5,833
May            H  Arsenal         6,234
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Comrade Blitz on January 18, 2015, 12:57:31 AM
Then Ryanair started flying from Dublin and Oslo.

There's a Dublin in Georgia and I just spent far too long trying to figure out why Ryanair would EVER want to fly to/from there.

As it is only 20:00 I can't blame lack of sleep or too much wine on that one.....Georgia on my mind.......
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:01:46 AM
Albion went down in 85/86 with 24 points and a -54GD from 42 games. They only won 4 league games and amusingly 2 were against small heath. Who not surprisingly joined them with 29 points and a -43GD.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 01:03:18 AM
Albion went down in 85/86 with 24 points and a -54GD from 42 games. They only won 4 league games and amusingly 2 were against small heath. Who not surprisingly joined them with 29 points and a -43GD.

And the man who relegated them is never the answer in the quiz question.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:06:10 AM
You mean people never think of him?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 01:10:54 AM
You mean people never think of him?

"Who relegated two clubs in the same season?" is a common quiz question. The answer is invariably Billy McNeill.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:13:14 AM
Albion went down in 85/86 with 24 points and a -54GD from 42 games. They only won 4 league games and amusingly 2 were against small heath. Who not surprisingly joined them with 29 points and a -43GD.

Small Heath v Villa 85/86  24,971
Small Heath v WBA           11,514

Can't find the Albion v Villa/Albion v Small Heath attendances.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:16:17 AM
Albion went down in 85/86 with 24 points and a -54GD from 42 games. They only won 4 league games and amusingly 2 were against small heath. Who not surprisingly joined them with 29 points and a -43GD.

And the man who relegated them is never the answer in the quiz question.

85/86 Ron Saunders, Small Heath and Albion
86/87 Billy McNeil, Man City and Villa
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:17:21 AM
People tend to forget how hated Ron was for a while, certainly by a lot of people I knew. And then he relegates small and Albion in the same season and just for laughs throws in the home defeat to Altrincham as a bonus to us. I think that was his last match before going to Albion. Between them they lost 55 games out of 84 and conceded 162 goals.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:21:04 AM
Albion went down in 85/86 with 24 points and a -54GD from 42 games. They only won 4 league games and amusingly 2 were against small heath. Who not surprisingly joined them with 29 points and a -43GD.

Small Heath v Villa 85/86  24,971
Small Heath v WBA           11,514

Can't find the Albion v Villa/Albion v Small Heath attendances.

Us v both

small heath (a) 29,471 (h) 26,694 (our second highest of the season. The Manure game pulled a massive 27,626!
Albion (a) 17,077 (h) 18,796
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 01:21:45 AM
People tend to forget how hated Ron was for a while, certainly by a lot of people I knew. And then he relegates small and Albion in the same season and just for laughs throws in the home defeat to Altrincham as a bonus to us. I think that was his last match before going to Albion. Between them they lost 55 games out of 84 and conceded 162 goals.

He was certainly hated for a few months but post-Rotterdam it was a case of "We've moved on, fuck him." In fact one of the most incredible aspects of that insane period was how little fuss was made when he came back with them. Compare that to what would have happened if Sirralex had walked out of Old Trafford and returned with Manchester City.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:22:06 AM
There will be kids (compared to us) reading this stuff and thinking we're making it up!

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:25:35 AM
Albion went down in 85/86 with 24 points and a -54GD from 42 games. They only won 4 league games and amusingly 2 were against small heath. Who not surprisingly joined them with 29 points and a -43GD.

Small Heath v Villa 85/86  24,971
Small Heath v WBA           11,514

Can't find the Albion v Villa/Albion v Small Heath attendances.

Us v both

small heath (a) 29,471 (h) 26,694 (our second highest of the season. The Manure game pulled a massive 27,626!
Albion (a) 17,077 (h) 18,796


24,971 Small Heath v Villa, not 29,471. You were adding their attendances for the Villa and Southampton games together to be kind to them weren't you? :)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:28:54 AM
You are quite correct Damo. Just me being stupid and typing the wrong numbers at this time of the morning. I'm not even going to attempt to blag my way out of that one!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:31:28 AM
People tend to forget how hated Ron was for a while, certainly by a lot of people I knew. And then he relegates small and Albion in the same season and just for laughs throws in the home defeat to Altrincham as a bonus to us. I think that was his last match before going to Albion. Between them they lost 55 games out of 84 and conceded 162 goals.

He was certainly hated for a few months but post-Rotterdam it was a case of "We've moved on, fuck him." In fact one of the most incredible aspects of that insane period was how little fuss was made when he came back with them. Compare that to what would have happened if Sirralex had walked out of Old Trafford and returned with Manchester City.

We played them at the sty immediately after he took over didn't we? Although I am not sure if he officially took over for that game or immediately afterwards. 0-1, Peter Withe. "You must be f***ing mad Saunders, Saunders". Boxing Day '82 at the sty was the nastiest atmosphere on the terraces.  September or October 1983 was the nastiest atmosphere on the pitch in tose Saunders/SHA years.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:32:32 AM
People tend to forget how hated Ron was for a while, certainly by a lot of people I knew. And then he relegates small and Albion in the same season and just for laughs throws in the home defeat to Altrincham as a bonus to us. I think that was his last match before going to Albion. Between them they lost 55 games out of 84 and conceded 162 goals.

We played them at the sty immediately after he took over didn't we? Although I am not sure if he officially took over for that game or immediately afterwards. 0-1, Peter Withe. "You must be f***ing mad Saunders, Saunders". Boxing Day '82 at the sty was the nastiest atmosphere on the terraces.  September or October 1983 was the nastiest atmosphere on the pitch in tose Saunders/SHA years.

He was certainly hated for a few months but post-Rotterdam it was a case of "We've moved on, fuck him." In fact one of the most incredible aspects of that insane period was how little fuss was made when he came back with them. Compare that to what would have happened if Sirralex had walked out of Old Trafford and returned with Manchester City.


My post is the middle one. I'm having a quotemare.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:34:22 AM
Is everyone going to quote fail tonight?  :P

I was only 12 at the time so don't remember the games but i'm sure i've read that he signed his contract on the pitch before the Sty game?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:35:59 AM
I should charge for the quote fixes, i'd be able to buy Randy out within a week.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:39:47 AM
How about fixing them before you talk about charging for them! ;)
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 18, 2015, 01:40:56 AM
I changed the original! That will be £5 please.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 01:41:51 AM
People tend to forget how hated Ron was for a while, certainly by a lot of people I knew. And then he relegates small and Albion in the same season and just for laughs throws in the home defeat to Altrincham as a bonus to us. I think that was his last match before going to Albion. Between them they lost 55 games out of 84 and conceded 162 goals.

He was certainly hated for a few months but post-Rotterdam it was a case of "We've moved on, fuck him." In fact one of the most incredible aspects of that insane period was how little fuss was made when he came back with them. Compare that to what would have happened if Sirralex had walked out of Old Trafford and returned with Manchester City.

We played them at the sty immediately after he took over didn't we? Although I am not sure if he officially took over for that game or immediately afterwards. 0-1, Peter Withe. "You must be f***ing mad Saunders, Saunders". Boxing Day '82 at the sty was the nastiest atmosphere on the terraces.  September or October 1983 was the nastiest atmosphere on the pitch in those Saunders/SHA years.

He took over the following week. I agree about the atmospheres although the second division game there (or as it was referred to called later by several people, 'the Vietnam match') was the worst ever. As was said about it, "You got the feeling that if a match had been lit the place would explode."
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:48:04 AM
I was twelve Boxing Day '82 and the atmosphere was pure hate between rival supporters and supporters and rival players. I was in Australia when we played them in December '87. People who were there suggest I was probably just about the right distance away it was that bad.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 01:51:30 AM
I was twelve Boxing Day '82 and the atmosphere was pure hate between rival supporters and supporters and rival players. I was in Australia when we played them in December '87. People who were there suggest I was probably just about the right distance away it was that bad.

Due to a cock-up over taxis we arrived at about 3.15 with a police helicopter hovering overhead and assorted dogs, horses and officers clearly regrouping for round two. After the game I was walking through the city centre with mayhem all around (it was the Saturday before Christmas) and it's the only time when I've thought society didn't deserve to have this thrust upon it. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 01:54:07 AM
Eye witnesses always mention the helicopters. It always makes me think of the desert scene in Capricorn One.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 01:56:50 AM
And as was said about the Old Crown that day, "It survived the Peasants Revolt, two civil wars, the Chartists, the Suffragettes and the Blitz. It got wrecked when Villa played Blues."
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: OzVilla on January 18, 2015, 04:51:30 AM
Eye witnesses always mention the helicopters. It always makes me think of the desert scene in Capricorn One.

Yep, I'll never forget he chopper, came in really low as it all kicked off in the corner where the Tilton  meets the Kop.

We got there really early as knew they'd be trouble beforehand. First major rendition of 'My Old Man' come out that day too.





Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pat McMahon on January 18, 2015, 07:58:14 AM
I was twelve Boxing Day '82 and the atmosphere was pure hate between rival supporters and supporters and rival players. I was in Australia when we played them in December '87. People who were there suggest I was probably just about the right distance away it was that bad.

Due to a cock-up over taxis we arrived at about 3.15 with a police helicopter hovering overhead and assorted dogs, horses and officers clearly regrouping for round two. After the game I was walking through the city centre with mayhem all around (it was the Saturday before Christmas) and it's the only time when I've thought society didn't deserve to have this thrust upon it. 

It was my 25th birthday and I got the train up from London with a raging hangover but knew I needed my wits about me as soon as I got to New St. I have never been as scared as I was in the crush outside the Tilton - it took an hour to get in the ground because of their ineptitude, and aggressive policing added to the somewhat feisty atmosphere.

Funnily enough I have no recollection at all of the helicopters.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: joe_c on January 18, 2015, 08:28:10 AM
Wolves averaged 4,000, Albion 12,000, we were 15,000 and small heath were 11,000.

Arsenal 24K, Spurs 21K.

And remember kids, when were winning the European Cup, Chavski were averaging 13K in division 2.

I am sure both Small Heath and Albion were down to about 6,500 in the last weeks of the season.

In 1989 small heath AVERAGED 6,200. Part of a run of 5 years when their best average was 8,500. I'm not laughing as I type that, honest.

I remember the Holte singing "Six thousand Blues fans, there's only six thousand Blues fans" during those particular wilderness years.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 18, 2015, 08:36:04 AM
They beat us 3-0 Boxing Day 82 didn't they? There is a video on Youtube of the game in 87 I think. I have never seen such a packed away section as we had in the Tilton.

It must be have been extra moody at the Sty being at that end and coming up the Cov Road and walking all the way round the ground.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Richard E on January 18, 2015, 08:37:24 AM
The six thousand Blues fans song was being sung at that 'Vietnam' game in 1987. I was only willing to go to that one if my Dad came with us for protection.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 18, 2015, 08:53:26 AM
Vietnam game, I like it. Given WMP's reputation for getting stuck in you can imagine they'd have liked a door gunner in their chopper.

I remember how bad the 2002/03 games were and the media reaction, particularly Sky's look of horror that the evilness of it all wasn't on message with the Best League in the world friendly derby malarkey. I guess it must have been a taster of 80s football. Was it all just amplified in 87?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 09:03:55 AM
They beat us 3-0 Boxing Day 82 didn't they? There is a video on Youtube of the game in 87 I think. I have never seen such a packed away section as we had in the Tilton.

It must be have been extra moody at the Sty being at that end and coming up the Cov Road and walking all the way round the ground.

We didn't. We used to approach the ground from Garrison Lane.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: OzVilla on January 18, 2015, 09:06:12 AM
87 at the Sty was certainly bad but it was actually on a par with 03/03/03 for an evil atmosphere.

For the first time ever we became them at home, mainstream fans being just as interested in settling scores outside the ground as on the pitch. Relatively sane, respectable Vila fans I knew turned into something else that night.

The 87 game was about righting a wrong (they'd beaten us at home in August), taking the piss and going home. 

Anyone remember the skinead noses with their bed sheets before the game, the bare patch of grass in front of the Tilton (rumours abounded) and the nets that weren't tied down properly (see earlier rumours).




Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithe on January 18, 2015, 09:20:34 AM
I dont recall the helicopter at the 87 game either, I think one of the reasons for the atmosphere was the crowding in the 2 pens at the Tilton meant that they, wisely, opened the third one which was meant to be a no-mans land beteeen the two sets of supporters, as cramped Villa fans streamed into that one all their lads came down to that area from the back of the Kop

The return walk down Curzon Street was like a scene from Troy.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: London Villan on January 18, 2015, 09:24:09 AM
The December 1987 game was my first away match. Sat in the Upper Railway with a mix of Villa and Blues it was mesmerising watching the chaos at the Tilton/Kop corner.

Things I remember...
A Villa fan getting thrown out of the Kop and landing on the pitch.
Running battles at the Kop/Tilton corner.
Ambulances everywhere.
Villa scoring and the ball going through the net.

Has anyone got the link to the game as I can't find it on Youtube?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Richard E on January 18, 2015, 09:27:44 AM
The other thing I remember was them unveiling a 'sh*t on the Villa' bedsheet that very quickly got confiscated.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Nev on January 18, 2015, 09:54:13 AM
One of the bedsheets had "Baldwin is a Goose" scrawled on it. I never found out what that meant.
We were in the first section of the Tilton but went home through Bordesley 'cos we were from that side of town and therefore missed the chaos outside afterwards. But inside under the slate grey skies, teeming rain and vicious atmosphere the scenes on the kop corner were something to behold for a 16 year old.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: OzVilla on January 18, 2015, 10:02:35 AM
It really started kicking off at half time and into the 2nd half. I was standing in the centre paddock halfway back on the last stantion ( prime position) and thre were some very handy lads desperate to mix it with the Noses once heyd opened 3rd tier. They were streaming down there to have a pop.

My Brother drove so we avoided Coventry Road and had a fairly easy way out.

2 goals for Bruno, 3 points, thanks very much now fuck off.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: john e on January 18, 2015, 10:27:05 AM
I remember that That first match at Blues after Ron had gone , I took a mate of mine to his first game of football saying everything would be OK

in those days you just paid at the turn style, as we entered the ground there were fans fighting all over the pitch, especially in front of the long side stand that they used as there 'end' (don't know what it's called)
Police horses being used to try and regain order, mayhem breaking out all over the place

My mate and I are in our  early 50's now and he still reminds me of it when I see him

Oh the good old days

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 02:00:43 PM
They beat us 3-0 Boxing Day 82 didn't they? There is a video on Youtube of the game in 87 I think. I have never seen such a packed away section as we had in the Tilton.

It must be have been extra moody at the Sty being at that end and coming up the Cov Road and walking all the way round the ground.

Lots of coins thrown on the pitch. Lots of abuse of Blake ("thief, Reject"). He opened the scoring and The Mail the following day had a big picture of him celebrating by giving us the V sign under the headline 'REJECTS REVENGE'. I think Handysides wrapped it up near the end. Can't remember who got their second. It wasn't Curbishley was it? I was watching the game with the Villa fans but my bluenose uncle was a steward and made the mistake of taking my cousin's husband 'Ginger' (Villa fan who some may know) into the players bar afterwards. He and Van Den Hauwe 'had words' when Ginger told VDH the noses had been lucky. Knowing what I know about both Ginger and VDH I can't believe they only had words.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pete3206 on January 18, 2015, 02:11:30 PM
Did you know that the Boxing Day 82 match was actually played on Mon 27th Dec? Was Sunday a no go area for football at this time?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithe on January 18, 2015, 02:41:27 PM
Didnt whoever vandalised the nets own up in one of the hoolie books?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 18, 2015, 02:48:14 PM
Did you know that the Boxing Day 82 match was actually played on Mon 27th Dec? Was Sunday a no go area for football at this time?

It is the old thing about if the 26th Dec is a Sunday Boxing Day is on the 27th. Something to do with The Commonwealth and Bank Holidays.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Pat McMahon on January 18, 2015, 03:37:24 PM
I remember that That first match at Blues after Ron had gone , I took a mate of mine to his first game of football saying everything would be OK

in those days you just paid at the turn style, as we entered the ground there were fans fighting all over the pitch, especially in front of the long side stand that they used as there 'end' (don't know what it's called)
Police horses being used to try and regain order, mayhem breaking out all over the place

My mate and I are in our  early 50's now and he still reminds me of it when I see him

Oh the good old days



I took a Geordie mate to that game and the afternoon long mayhem was a joy to behold for him. To this day he thinks Villa are mad.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 06:17:00 PM
87 at the Sty was certainly bad but it was actually on a par with 03/03/03 for an evil atmosphere.

For the first time ever we became them at home, mainstream fans being just as interested in settling scores outside the ground as on the pitch. Relatively sane, respectable Vila fans I knew turned into something else that night.

The 87 game was about righting a wrong (they'd beaten us at home in August), taking the piss and going home. 

Anyone remember the skinead noses with their bed sheets before the game, the bare patch of grass in front of the Tilton (rumours abounded) and the nets that weren't tied down properly (see earlier rumours).


1987 was just a worse manifestation of what always used to happen when we played them. 03x3 had many factors, not least the kick-offs at the Sty and Brady's idiotic boasts about being "the real Brummie club" and the tide turning or whatever the stupid cow called it. 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 18, 2015, 07:28:41 PM
The Vietnam game would have been my last at the Sty had a rather nice girl I knew not leaned out of her tower block window and invited me in for a spliff while I was waiting for the bus to the ground.

By the time we played them again I had decided that They would never get another penny of my money, unless it was in the form of thrown coins.

So my last game there was either the League game in 85/86, when I sat in the main stand with my zulu mates, or the Birmingham Senior Cup Final around that time, when we chased my zulu mates round town before the game, in a rather unexpected 'result'.

Whichever out of those came last.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Lky on January 18, 2015, 07:48:26 PM
I remember the 82 game as quite fun. Stood by the net as I remember but can't honestly remembers seeing any trouble. We got there early and was rammed. I do remember 2 villa fans fighting in front of us and a packet of fags falling out and picking them up. Funny how you remember stupid things as a 12 year old. Certainly didn't feel scared.
Another fact maybe - Didn't they do a load of local derbys that day Liverpool v Everton; Spurs v Arsenal maybe others; I thought what a good idea; the police probably didn't and it probably hasn't happened since

Was the 87 game the old second division game; 2 nil; Thommo scored a header just early second half ? Cant remember the other.
Again didn't see any trouble !
We probably didn't get to the ground until 2.45 but we queued outside and got crushed; I do remember we didn't get in until half time; again only from memory absolutely rammed at the top of the stand where you went in but we managed to go down and it was comfortable.... ish.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 18, 2015, 08:46:58 PM
One of the bedsheets had "Baldwin is a Goose" scrawled on it. I never found out what that meant.
We were in the first section of the Tilton but went home through Bordesley 'cos we were from that side of town and therefore missed the chaos outside afterwards. But inside under the slate grey skies, teeming rain and vicious atmosphere the scenes on the kop corner were something to behold for a 16 year old.

That was some geezers from Chelmsley winding up my mate Tony Baldwin, also from Chelmsley, who we had then recently nick-named 'the goose'. He didn't like it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 18, 2015, 09:12:24 PM
Which was the year of the game we won 2-1 at the sty when the SHA player shot wide and the ref gave a goal ? 87 I think . Plenty of Agro that day.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 09:18:43 PM
Which was the year of the game we won 2-1 at the sty when the SHA player shot wide and the ref gave a goal ? 87 I think . Plenty of Agro that day.

You're thinking of our goal which went into the net and out through the side netting. That was 1987.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Witton Warrior on January 18, 2015, 09:38:47 PM
I gather we just sit back and do fuck all then?
Enjoying the reminiscence for sure - the good old days - all we've got now really
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 18, 2015, 09:45:50 PM
Protests are probably easier at away games . The fans are more vocal and bullish when on the road.
At home it would feel a bit like taking a piss in the middle of your living room with the family watching (not that I know what that feels like).
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ad@m on January 18, 2015, 09:50:21 PM
Protests are probably easier at away games . The fans are more vocal and bullish when on the road.
At home it would feel a bit like taking a piss in the middle of your living room with the family watching (not that I know what that feels like).

Come again?!

Protests are generally aimed at the people in charge at the club and/or to get publicity.  Why would anyone take notice of a protest miles away from the club itself and performed by a tiny minority of the crowd?!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 18, 2015, 09:50:46 PM
Which was the year of the game we won 2-1 at the sty when the SHA player shot wide and the ref gave a goal ? 87 I think . Plenty of Agro that day.

You're thinking of our goal which went into the net and out through the side netting. That was 1987.

If memory serves it was their equaliser that went through the net and out - Andy Kennedy.  Villa fans had broken in and daubed graffiti and damaged the goals the night before.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 18, 2015, 09:52:54 PM
Which was the year of the game we won 2-1 at the sty when the SHA player shot wide and the ref gave a goal ? 87 I think . Plenty of Agro that day.

You're thinking of our goal which went into the net and out through the side netting. That was 1987.

If memory serves it was their equaliser that went through the net and out - Andy Kennedy.  Villa fans had broken in and daubed graffiti and damaged the goals the night before.

That's it - my mistake.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 18, 2015, 09:54:36 PM
Fancy them not even checking the nets out before the game.  They were really tawdry and still are.  That game was pretty tasty trying to get back to Dale End afterwards was anyway.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 18, 2015, 09:56:07 PM
That game was mental outside there were villa fans still getting into the game at HT I recall
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ChicagoLion on January 18, 2015, 09:56:44 PM
Protests are probably easier at away games . The fans are more vocal and bullish when on the road.
At home it would feel a bit like taking a piss in the middle of your living room with the family watching (not that I know what that feels like).

Come again?!

Protests are generally aimed at the people in charge at the club and/or to get publicity.  Why would anyone take notice of a protest miles away from the club itself and performed by a tiny minority of the crowd?!
we need a Bolton moment.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: silhillvilla on January 18, 2015, 09:59:56 PM
We do need a Bolton moment .
Sorry my point was it seems much harder to get the majority of villa Park onside for a protest. I think people who moan on forums such as this about lambert and Lerner etc are in the minority by a distance .
Or most villa fans are too polite or apathetic to bother protesting or similar .
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Witton Warrior on January 18, 2015, 10:24:49 PM
We do need a Bolton moment .
Sorry my point was it seems much harder to get the majority of villa Park onside for a protest. I think people who moan on forums such as this about lambert and Lerner etc are in the minority by a distance .
Or most villa fans are too polite or apathetic to bother protesting or similar .

The trouble is we are talking about trying to co-ordinate a large number of individuals  - I used to travel up to VP with 8 others, these days it is 1 or just me to meet 2 others. Having to sit in numbered seats like sheep and not able to mix freely as in the terrace days stops this as well. The practicalities are problematic.

Yesterday was a poor choice as there were so  many tourists and occasional attenders (nothing against you brothers and sisters) - note it was the Blackpool match when Lambert started to cop it - likewise I would target the Bournemouth match.

I don't care if he isn't going I'm going to continue telling the useless manager he's fooking useless as long as we do not perform well on the pitch like the last two and a half seasons have shown.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 18, 2015, 11:16:38 PM
19th February the AVISA are having their AGM at the ground and a forum with Tom Fox, it's for paid up members only but anyone who is interested in getting your point across to someone with some power at the club I can't think of a better opportunity than this apart from match days because you can bet your bottom dollar that twat Lambert will still be dragging us down then.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: andyh on January 18, 2015, 11:20:50 PM
I absolutely agree that this proposed 'protest' has missed the point and should be clearly against the manager not the chairman, who wants out anyway.
But, if things aren't going our way today, I think there is still too much apathy around for an outburst against Lambert.
For a start there will be too many half and halfers.
Then,  there will be a great many who will use the old augment that we shouldn't expect to be beating the 'big boys' anyway.
I think it will be the usual collective shrug and sigh as people traipse out of the stadium, trying to get back to the warm as quickly as possible.


Pretty much as I thought.
I think Sunday will be a different matter though and lambert will get a dogs abuse if we aren't winning after 80 mins or so.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 18, 2015, 11:26:31 PM
I absolutely agree that this proposed 'protest' has missed the point and should be clearly against the manager not the chairman, who wants out anyway.
But, if things aren't going our way today, I think there is still too much apathy around for an outburst against Lambert.
For a start there will be too many half and halfers.
Then,  there will be a great many who will use the old augment that we shouldn't expect to be beating the 'big boys' anyway.
I think it will be the usual collective shrug and sigh as people traipse out of the stadium, trying to get back to the warm as quickly as possible.


Pretty much as I thought.
I think Sunday will be a different matter though and lambert will get a dogs abuse if we aren't winning after 80 mins or so.
Very much THIS.



Only the die-hards will be there anyway.

Out of my regular gang of 8 I know at least 3 who have no intention at all of attending.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 19, 2015, 12:30:33 AM
As it's a cheap ticket game a lot won't be diehards. It's the kind of game folks that can't afford many/any league games will go to.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ad@m on January 19, 2015, 06:32:37 AM
http://www.myoldmansaid.com/what-was-not-reported-origins-of-the-holte-end-demonstration/

Backtracking of the highest order!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: McGraths Dry Cleaning on January 19, 2015, 07:37:34 AM
We do need a Bolton moment .
Sorry my point was it seems much harder to get the majority of villa Park onside for a protest. I think people who moan on forums such as this about lambert and Lerner etc are in the minority by a distance .
Or most villa fans are too polite or apathetic to bother protesting or similar .
The Bolton moment was organic though wasn't it? Can't remember any talk of organised protest before the game but conceding 2 goals in a minute (or whatever it was) led to an outpouring of grief so intense Villa fans everywhere felt a disturbance in the Force.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 07:40:54 AM
Bolton was a continuation for the end of Wigan away.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on January 19, 2015, 08:36:48 AM
http://www.myoldmansaid.com/what-was-not-reported-origins-of-the-holte-end-demonstration/

Backtracking of the highest order!

Q When is a protest not a protest?
A When its a farce.


"I would've supported the protest Tom, but they turned the tellies off".
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: chrisw1 on January 19, 2015, 09:06:53 AM
http://www.myoldmansaid.com/what-was-not-reported-origins-of-the-holte-end-demonstration/

Backtracking of the highest order!


Q When is a protest not a protest?
A When its a farce.


"I would've supported the protest Tom, but they turned the tellies off".


I thought the protest was a stupid idea and told them so repeatedly on their FB stream, as did many others - there was a clear weight of opinion 'against' as opposed to 'for.'

However, what you cannot deny is that there has been FAR more coverage on Villa this week than usual, I've never heard so much radio, TV and newspaper analysis on us as I have this week.  Therefore, whilst ill conceived in it's nature (in my opinion) one thing I have to concede to MOMS (and the others) is that in highlighting our plight to the national press and, crucially, prompting them to talk about it, it was really quite a success.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: levico on January 19, 2015, 09:09:46 AM
Looks like the club are always one step ahead. Apathy reigns amonst supporters as we sleepwalk to the Championship.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ron Manager on January 19, 2015, 09:15:50 AM
http://www.myoldmansaid.com/what-was-not-reported-origins-of-the-holte-end-demonstration/

Backtracking of the highest order!


Q When is a protest not a protest?
A When its a farce.


"I would've supported the protest Tom, but they turned the tellies off".


I thought the protest was a stupid idea and told them so repeatedly on their FB stream, as did many others - there was a clear weight of opinion 'against' as opposed to 'for.'

However, what you cannot deny is that there has been FAR more coverage on Villa this week than usual, I've never heard so much radio, TV and newspaper analysis on us as I have this week.  Therefore, whilst ill conceived in it's nature (in my opinion) one thing I have to concede to MOMS (and the others) is that in highlighting our plight to the national press and, crucially, prompting them to talk about it, it was really quite a success.

I agree. This so called protest generated some much needed interest in the media even if it was seen as a failure. So well done to the people who at least tried to do something to help fellow supporters in their hour of need,
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 19, 2015, 09:25:29 AM
They weren't trying to help the rest of us in some noble cause in the face of frenzied opposition. A handful wanted to protest, the rest either don't agree or else thought it wasn't the time or place.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 19, 2015, 09:40:03 AM
A quote from that self indugant post on MOMS.

'It was not an organised protest against Lerner and/or Lambert'

What was the aim of it then if it wasn't against either of those two, and why 8 minutes?

Oh and apparantely, it was a demo not a protest. Hmm.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on January 19, 2015, 11:59:20 AM
http://www.myoldmansaid.com/what-was-not-reported-origins-of-the-holte-end-demonstration/

Backtracking of the highest order!


Q When is a protest not a protest?
A When its a farce.


"I would've supported the protest Tom, but they turned the tellies off".


I thought the protest was a stupid idea and told them so repeatedly on their FB stream, as did many others - there was a clear weight of opinion 'against' as opposed to 'for.'

However, what you cannot deny is that there has been FAR more coverage on Villa this week than usual, I've never heard so much radio, TV and newspaper analysis on us as I have this week.  Therefore, whilst ill conceived in it's nature (in my opinion) one thing I have to concede to MOMS (and the others) is that in highlighting our plight to the national press and, crucially, prompting them to talk about it, it was really quite a success.

I agree. This so called protest generated some much needed interest in the media even if it was seen as a failure. So well done to the people who at least tried to do something to help fellow supporters in their hour of need,

There has been far more coverage but its come across as 'fickle' Villa fans again. Anyone listening to 5 Live on Saturday would've heard some very disparaging comments when the proposed 'demo' didn't materialise. I'm all for protest but it must be organised and not thrown together. Whatever the results coming up, who is going to want to join any form of protest now?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: chrisw1 on January 19, 2015, 12:17:55 PM

Maybe some disparaging comments,but I heard plenty of comment about how poor we've been, lack of goals etc.  The like of Lee Hendrie were talking about it being time for Lambert to go.

I thought the protest was a poor idea, but if the idea was to put the spotlight ob the club / pressure on Lambert then it has certainly done that.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: NeilH on January 19, 2015, 02:43:11 PM
I’ve heard apathetic being mentioned a number of times with regards to our fans and I take a little exception to this. Apathetic seems to imply that we either don’t’ care, or do care and can’t be bothered. My take on it is that we do care, but know that in reality we can do bugger all about it. Lerner is not going to listen to us, Lambert is certainly not going to walk away from a lucrative contract and the bottom line is that we gave up our say in the club when we all flogged our shares to Randy Lerner. We own no piece of the club now and Lerner can frankly do what the hell he pleases.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dekko on January 19, 2015, 02:45:00 PM
EDIT:  Agreed ^^^

I thought the protest was a poor idea, but if the idea was to put the spotlight ob the club / pressure on Lambert then it has certainly done that.

This is my thinking also.

On a related note, how often do you actually see press and pundits actually outright saying 'this manager is not up to the job'?  I'd say its fairly rare (probably because many footy journos are lazy they tend to just say anyone outside the top 8 or so 'hasn't had any money to spend').
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 03:10:04 PM
I’ve heard apathetic being mentioned a number of times with regards to our fans and I take a little exception to this. Apathetic seems to imply that we either don’t’ care, or do care and can’t be bothered.

Quite.

I have driven 1176 miles following us over our last five league games and I haven't seen us score a single goal. Anybody who wishes to suggest I don't care, can fuck off.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 19, 2015, 03:10:24 PM
Quote
and Lerner can frankly do what the hell he pleases.

... he is dong just that. He pleases to do nothing.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: aj2k77 on January 19, 2015, 03:12:22 PM
I’ve heard apathetic being mentioned a number of times with regards to our fans and I take a little exception to this. Apathetic seems to imply that we either don’t’ care, or do care and can’t be bothered.

Quite.

I have driven 1176 miles following us over our last five league games and I haven't seen us score a single goal. Anybody who wishes to suggest I don't care, can fuck off.

What was more interesting? The drive or the matches?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: richard moore on January 19, 2015, 03:21:26 PM
I’ve heard apathetic being mentioned a number of times with regards to our fans and I take a little exception to this. Apathetic seems to imply that we either don’t’ care, or do care and can’t be bothered. My take on it is that we do care, but know that in reality we can do bugger all about it. Lerner is not going to listen to us, Lambert is certainly not going to walk away from a lucrative contract and the bottom line is that we gave up our say in the club when we all flogged our shares to Randy Lerner. We own no piece of the club now and Lerner can frankly do what the hell he pleases.

I think you will find with regard to the last sentence that that is exactly what he is doing and what concerns us the most....
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 03:26:04 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Split between Villa Park and away from home, this comes to: 267.14 miles per goal at Villa Park and 692.95 miles per goal on the road.

My car will do, roughly 0.12p to the mile, so its currently costing me £50.64 in fuel, although I drive faster when we lose.

Fuck off Lambert!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 19, 2015, 03:27:36 PM
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/sport-opinion/abuse-football-fans-dish-out-8474596

Annoying.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 19, 2015, 03:27:46 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Split between Villa Park and away from home, this comes to: 267.14 miles per goal at Villa Park and 692.95 miles per goal on the road.

My car will do, roughly 0.12p to the mile, so its currently costing me £50.64 in fuel, although I drive faster when we lose.

Fuck off Lambert!

You should tweet that to a newspaper or something.

A monumentally depressing "this is what it is like" story in real-life terms.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 19, 2015, 03:28:48 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Split between Villa Park and away from home, this comes to: 267.14 miles per goal at Villa Park and 692.95 miles per goal on the road.

My car will do, roughly 0.12p to the mile, so its currently costing me £50.64 in fuel, although I drive faster when we lose.

Fuck off Lambert!

I'm laughing with you
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 03:31:30 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Split between Villa Park and away from home, this comes to: 267.14 miles per goal at Villa Park and 692.95 miles per goal on the road.

My car will do, roughly 0.12p to the mile, so its currently costing me £50.64 in fuel, although I drive faster when we lose.

Fuck off Lambert!

You should tweet that to a newspaper or something.

A monumentally depressing "this is what it is like" story in real-life terms.

I am not on Twitter unfortuantely. I am just bored at work, although not as bored as watching us.

That 421 miles per goal will get you from Lands End to Thirsk in N. Yorkshire. Google reckons it would take 6 hours, which is only two less than since we last scored a league goal.

"This is how it feels to support Villa!
This is how it feels to be bored!
This is how it feels when your team scores nothing at all
Nothing at all
Nothing at all
Nothing at all"

Its aging me at the moment. Honestly, I feel like the baddie at the end of the Last Crusade watching Lambert swamp yet more central midfielders into the soup of tedium.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 19, 2015, 03:38:19 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 19, 2015, 03:38:24 PM
For those that can't click on links at work etc, here are the 'wise' words from Gary Newbon from Malandro's post.

Quote
Only a handful of Aston Villa spectators made a stupid protest (for the opening eight minutes) of the home match with Liverpool. Who do these people really think they are?

Football fans are entitled to give their opinions and praise or criticise what they see on the pitch. But the abuse they dish out to football owners, who sink chunks of their own fortunes into the clubs, is disgraceful and out of order.

American Randy Lerner has spent around £300million on Villa and this cheap, planned protest against the eight years of his stewardship was ridiculous.

Lerner backed his first manager Martin O’Neill with heavy funds. Martin achieved sixth place in the Premier League, took Villa to two Wembley appearances (League Cup final and semi-final of FA Cup) but now Lerner, understandably, has put a brake on transfers.

He spends most of his time in the USA hoping that he can sell the club but he will not get his wish to get all his money back. He has already discovered that. Who would own a football club? Meanwhile, most of the Villa fans turned up on Saturday (over 39,000) and got behind their side, who were unlucky.

At one point, Birmingham fans turned on then owners David Sullivan and David Gold. I bet they would love them back now.

Instead, Sullivan and Gold are enjoying a high-flying time at West Ham where sticking with Sam Allardyce is paying off. West Ham are unbeaten this year and in seventh spot.

In midweek, I travelled on the train with a mate, Lord Snape (formerly Peter Snape, West Bromwich MP), and we talked about this subject. He helped save his club Stockport County from administration and all he got was abuse.

A couple of seasons ago they played their last game at Kidderminster. They had to win to stay in the Football League. We were both going but Kidderminster told Stockport’s board they could not attend due to safety reasons.

There were threats from the Stockport supporters that they would storm the directors’ box and possibly attack their board.

Lord Snape left the club, who have been relegated two divisions outside the Football League. They still owe him money and the fans are still abusing him on websites.

Stoke’s chairman Peter Coates has done a great job. But first time around he received abuse and threats. Now he is treated with the respect he deserves.

At the weekend, I was at Leicester-Stoke. The Leicester fans appreciate what their Thai owners are doing for the club and, apart from one stupid spectator who was recently involved in an altercation with Nigel Pearson, the Foxes supporters are right behind their manager... and Leicester are still bottom of the Premier League.

I co-hosted the packed Leicester Mercury Sports Awards on Thursday and Pearson received the biggest applause of the night. They appreciate what he has done for the club, and they may still stay up as it is so tight at the bottom.

So if you want to part with your fortune, get little credit but plenty of abuse... buy a football club.

The abuse will come from people who have no responsibility for running the club or investment – apart from buying their match ticket albeit with hard-earned cash. Sure they have a right to fairly criticise the manager and players if warranted but do not bash the sugar daddies!

Most football fans appreciate that but there are enough trying to make a name for themselves and take out their frustration on rich benefactors, who must think at times they are mugs.

Perhaps they are, because when they leave they are soon forgotten and they will never get much credit. When the team wins trophies, it is always about the manager and players. Fair enough!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithe on January 19, 2015, 03:39:34 PM
I wonder when Gary Newbon last put his hand in his pocket for a match ticket?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 19, 2015, 03:39:57 PM
For those that can't click on links at work etc, here are the 'wise' words from Gary Newbon from Malandro's post.

Quote
Only a handful of Aston Villa spectators made a stupid protest (for the opening eight minutes) of the home match with Liverpool. Who do these people really think they are?

Football fans are entitled to give their opinions and praise or criticise what they see on the pitch. But the abuse they dish out to football owners, who sink chunks of their own fortunes into the clubs, is disgraceful and out of order.

American Randy Lerner has spent around £300million on Villa and this cheap, planned protest against the eight years of his stewardship was ridiculous.

Lerner backed his first manager Martin O’Neill with heavy funds. Martin achieved sixth place in the Premier League, took Villa to two Wembley appearances (League Cup final and semi-final of FA Cup) but now Lerner, understandably, has put a brake on transfers.

He spends most of his time in the USA hoping that he can sell the club but he will not get his wish to get all his money back. He has already discovered that. Who would own a football club? Meanwhile, most of the Villa fans turned up on Saturday (over 39,000) and got behind their side, who were unlucky.

At one point, Birmingham fans turned on then owners David Sullivan and David Gold. I bet they would love them back now.

Instead, Sullivan and Gold are enjoying a high-flying time at West Ham where sticking with Sam Allardyce is paying off. West Ham are unbeaten this year and in seventh spot.

In midweek, I travelled on the train with a mate, Lord Snape (formerly Peter Snape, West Bromwich MP), and we talked about this subject. He helped save his club Stockport County from administration and all he got was abuse.

A couple of seasons ago they played their last game at Kidderminster. They had to win to stay in the Football League. We were both going but Kidderminster told Stockport’s board they could not attend due to safety reasons.

There were threats from the Stockport supporters that they would storm the directors’ box and possibly attack their board.

Lord Snape left the club, who have been relegated two divisions outside the Football League. They still owe him money and the fans are still abusing him on websites.

Stoke’s chairman Peter Coates has done a great job. But first time around he received abuse and threats. Now he is treated with the respect he deserves.

At the weekend, I was at Leicester-Stoke. The Leicester fans appreciate what their Thai owners are doing for the club and, apart from one stupid spectator who was recently involved in an altercation with Nigel Pearson, the Foxes supporters are right behind their manager... and Leicester are still bottom of the Premier League.

I co-hosted the packed Leicester Mercury Sports Awards on Thursday and Pearson received the biggest applause of the night. They appreciate what he has done for the club, and they may still stay up as it is so tight at the bottom.

So if you want to part with your fortune, get little credit but plenty of abuse... buy a football club.

The abuse will come from people who have no responsibility for running the club or investment – apart from buying their match ticket albeit with hard-earned cash. Sure they have a right to fairly criticise the manager and players if warranted but do not bash the sugar daddies!

Most football fans appreciate that but there are enough trying to make a name for themselves and take out their frustration on rich benefactors, who must think at times they are mugs.

Perhaps they are, because when they leave they are soon forgotten and they will never get much credit. When the team wins trophies, it is always about the manager and players. Fair enough!


What a humungous pile of horse shit that is.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dekko on January 19, 2015, 03:41:52 PM
What a load of muddled, rambling guff.

I think he's trying to say that you shouldn't criticise owners bceause some of them spend a lot of money for time to time.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 19, 2015, 03:41:59 PM
cheers for that PeterWithesShin, didn't think about the link thing.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 19, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
I've never liked Gary Newbon. The Sullivan and Gold comparison in that article is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 03:45:11 PM
What abuse is Lerner getting anyway?
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: john e on January 19, 2015, 03:47:10 PM
We can take the piss out of MOMs etc all we like but at least they did something, or tried to

OK it may well have been ill conceived, poorly organised and badly executed but they still did something

There's a lot of self righteous condescending posters on here who did nothing, but are the first to complain on their laptops, which let me tell you counts for nothing

I didn't even go, but I can't complain about those who felt it right to protest about how bad things have become
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 19, 2015, 03:48:51 PM
We can take the piss out of MOMs etc all we like but at least they did something, or tried to

OK it may well have been ill conceived, poorly organised and badly executed but they still did something

There's a lot of self righteous condescending posters on here who did nothing, but are the first to complain on their laptops, which let me tell you counts for nothing

I didn't even go, but I can't complain about those who felt it right to protest about how bad things have become


You do realise we're not talking about him, don't you? The above posts, I mean.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithe on January 19, 2015, 03:49:17 PM
I was surprised by how many joined in and didn't take their seats, a few hundred I reckon.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 03:51:00 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.

I have just added Arsenal away and Chelsea at home and it takes me pretty close to Lands End to Newcastle.

 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 19, 2015, 03:51:59 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.

I have just added Arsenal away and Chelsea at home and it takes me pretty close to Lands End to Newcastle.

 


Well, if you did manage to take it all the way to John O'Groats, you'd at least have the option of ploughing off a cliff and into the sea there to make it stop.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: john e on January 19, 2015, 03:54:13 PM
We can take the piss out of MOMs etc all we like but at least they did something, or tried to

OK it may well have been ill conceived, poorly organised and badly executed but they still did something

There's a lot of self righteous condescending posters on here who did nothing, but are the first to complain on their laptops, which let me tell you counts for nothing

I didn't even go, but I can't complain about those who felt it right to protest about how bad things have become


You do realise we're not talking about him, don't you? The above posts, I mean.


I'm just saying generally, we all want a change, but don't do anything,
at least some people did
I don't know who they are, they might be a right bunch of norberts  for all I know, but they tried and failed, but at least tried
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Gareth on January 19, 2015, 03:56:19 PM
Newborn might be onto something, with his logic that we dare not have an opinion contrary to the paymasters all companies in the country can closedown their complaints or customer services depts...think of the money they'll save!

Has he been reading up on North Korean propaganda? Gary, you might have been a media luvvie in the 80's, today your outdated opinions mean nothing...
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: The Left Side on January 19, 2015, 03:58:51 PM
What a load of muddled, rambling guff.

I think he's trying to say that you shouldn't criticise owners bceause some of them spend a lot of money for time to time.

Newbon = muddled, rambling guff
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 04:03:28 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.

I have just added Arsenal away and Chelsea at home and it takes me pretty close to Lands End to Newcastle.

 


Well, if you did manage to take it all the way to John O'Groats, you'd at least have the option of ploughing off a cliff and into the sea there to make it stop.

...and as my car plunges into the deep and sinks to the bottom of the dark deep sea, I will slowly begin to drown, before being saved by a tidy looking mermaid, with shells for a bra and everything. My car will hit the bedrock and it will strike oil. I will rise from the water like an Arthurian legend, buy the land, sink a well and start flogging black gold. Enough black gold to buy me a volcano island, an orange Lamborghini and five Italian super models who will lick strawberry yoghurt off my nad sack.

I will then buy the Villa and have a 400 foot statue of me erected outside the gates of the Holte End and demand to be worshiped like some sort of God like king, as my megalomania becomes all consuming.

Then you'll be wishing you had Lerner back.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Malandro on January 19, 2015, 04:09:45 PM
Sure, Randy deserves a little criticism (mainly for not sacking the manager) but really my problem is predominately with Lambert. 
Poor football, atrocious results and little hope for any better.

With the funds and players, we should be comfortably mid table.

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 19, 2015, 04:11:50 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.

I have just added Arsenal away and Chelsea at home and it takes me pretty close to Lands End to Newcastle.

Forget Newcastle, you could go to Vallence in southern France or the charming town of St Gallen in Switzerland, near the Austrian border.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Ads on January 19, 2015, 04:16:07 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.

I have just added Arsenal away and Chelsea at home and it takes me pretty close to Lands End to Newcastle.

Forget Newcastle, you could go to Vallence in southern France or the charming town of St Gallen in Switzerland, near the Austrian border.

I remember a few years back reading about a Southampton fan that lived in New York, but he got to every home game on a weekend at St Mary's and this was around the time they were dropping through the leagues.

There is always somebody worse than you!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 19, 2015, 04:21:20 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Split between Villa Park and away from home, this comes to: 267.14 miles per goal at Villa Park and 692.95 miles per goal on the road.

My car will do, roughly 0.12p to the mile, so its currently costing me £50.64 in fuel, although I drive faster when we lose.

Fuck off Lambert!

Post of 2015 so far.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 19, 2015, 04:36:41 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.

I have just added Arsenal away and Chelsea at home and it takes me pretty close to Lands End to Newcastle.

 


Well, if you did manage to take it all the way to John O'Groats, you'd at least have the option of ploughing off a cliff and into the sea there to make it stop.

...and as my car plunges into the deep and sinks to the bottom of the dark deep sea, I will slowly begin to drown, before being saved by a tidy looking mermaid, with shells for a bra and everything. My car will hit the bedrock and it will strike oil. I will rise from the water like an Arthurian legend, buy the land, sink a well and start flogging black gold. Enough black gold to buy me a volcano island, an orange Lamborghini and five Italian super models who will lick strawberry yoghurt off my nad sack.

I will then buy the Villa and have a 400 foot statue of me erected outside the gates of the Holte End and demand to be worshiped like some sort of God like king, as my megalomania becomes all consuming.

Then you'll be wishing you had Lerner back.

Will Golden Muppets get free season tickets and Oakham Citra piped to their seats?

Will you play yourself as main striker every game?

Will you buy Cleverley for 100m and make him club captain?

How much will you give Lambert to spend on left backs?

Just a thought.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 19, 2015, 04:40:36 PM
To add an equally meaningless statistic to club Lambert over the head with, I have travelled 4641.8 miles following us in the league this season, which works out at 421.98 miles per goal.

Just in case you may be questioning your sanity, that's the equivalent of having to drive to Osnabrück, Lower Saxony in Germany every time you want to see a goal.

I have just added Arsenal away and Chelsea at home and it takes me pretty close to Lands End to Newcastle.

Forget Newcastle, you could go to Vallence in southern France or the charming town of St Gallen in Switzerland, near the Austrian border.

I remember a few years back reading about a Southampton fan that lived in New York, but he got to every home game on a weekend at St Mary's and this was around the time they were dropping through the leagues.

There is always somebody worse than you!

Indeed. Imagine if you had to live in Manchester.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Dave Cooper please on January 19, 2015, 10:42:45 PM
The Liverpool Protest was an utter waste of time because yet again, and ad nauseum (or whatever the Turkish is) the internet warriors think that having 500 likes and 200 favourites and loads of their mates saying how great they are means that the whole of the Holte End loves them and will obviously take part.
 
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 19, 2015, 11:29:31 PM
The Liverpool Protest was an utter waste of time because yet again, and ad nauseum (or whatever the Turkish is) the internet warriors think that having 500 likes and 200 favourites and loads of their mates saying how great they are means that the whole of the Holte End loves them and will obviously take part.
 

Clampy likes this.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: AV82EC on January 20, 2015, 05:23:52 AM
The Liverpool Protest was an utter waste of time because yet again, and ad nauseum (or whatever the Turkish is) the internet warriors think that having 500 likes and 200 favourites and loads of their mates saying how great they are means that the whole of the Holte End loves them and will obviously take part.

If ever there was a case of believing your own Internet hype or own self importance then this is it. People on the Internet specifically Facebook sites often forget they're not addressing thousands they're only impacting a couple of hundred at most as evidenced by the numbers who took part.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 20, 2015, 06:16:05 AM
The Liverpool Protest was an utter waste of time because yet again, and ad nauseum (or whatever the Turkish is) the internet warriors think that having 500 likes and 200 favourites and loads of their mates saying how great they are means that the whole of the Holte End loves them and will obviously take part.

If ever there was a case of believing your own Internet hype or own self importance then this is it. People on the Internet specifically Facebook sites often forget they're not addressing thousands they're only impacting a couple of hundred at most as evidenced by the numbers who took part.

The same applies on here and similar fan websites on any number of topics. We represent only a fraction of Villa fans. Not all saying our point of view on the state of he club isn't directionally correct but to think just because something might be supported on here with 90% of people doesn't translate automatically to other Villa fans. Clearly trying to drum up support via the Internet has its limitations and to think all it took was a FB rallying cry was naive in the extreme.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 20, 2015, 08:50:54 AM
One thing I quickly remembered when I was back on the streets over Christmas was the difference between opinions at the match and online. Post-Sunderland the immediate reaction was of frustration but on here it was closer to Armageddon.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pbavfckuwait on January 20, 2015, 11:50:25 AM
I think all agree it was a poorly thought out protest, very hard to achieve with any great amount of success, but as stated previously they are just letting out their frustration at the current situation.
I think one of the best organised protests and one that certainly had an effect especially with the media was the pound sign Doug Ellis one.
How about for the away game at Arsenal getting 3 or 4000 A4 size paper printed with 0 on, then if we do score they can be ripped up and turned into confetti to celebrate this rare occassion, especially seeing as it will be Tarquins staff that have to clear up the mess, continue this till we next score, mind you Green peace may have intervened on behalf of the rain forest;s before then.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: ClaretAndBlueBlood on January 20, 2015, 01:08:02 PM
I think all agree it was a poorly thought out protest, very hard to achieve with any great amount of success, but as stated previously they are just letting out their frustration at the current situation.
I think one of the best organised protests and one that certainly had an effect especially with the media was the pound sign Doug Ellis one.
How about for the away game at Arsenal getting 3 or 4000 A4 size paper printed with 0 on, then if we do score they can be ripped up and turned into confetti to celebrate this rare occassion, especially seeing as it will be Tarquins staff that have to clear up the mess, continue this till we next score, mind you Green peace may have intervened on behalf of the rain forest;s before then.

ha ha I like that, or just a card with z printed on it so that there are loads of z's signifying the tedium of it all, or ultimately the arrows pointing to the goal
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on January 20, 2015, 08:25:44 PM
I think all agree it was a poorly thought out protest, very hard to achieve with any great amount of success, but as stated previously they are just letting out their frustration at the current situation.
I think one of the best organised protests and one that certainly had an effect especially with the media was the pound sign Doug Ellis one.
How about for the away game at Arsenal getting 3 or 4000 A4 size paper printed with 0 on, then if we do score they can be ripped up and turned into confetti to celebrate this rare occassion, especially seeing as it will be Tarquins staff that have to clear up the mess, continue this till we next score, mind you Green peace may have intervened on behalf of the rain forest;s before then.

ha ha I like that, or just a card with z printed on it so that there are loads of z's signifying the tedium of it all, or ultimately the arrows pointing to the goal

Like it.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Legion on January 20, 2015, 08:26:40 PM
The Z-card idea is excellent!
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Archbishop Herbert Cockthrottle on January 20, 2015, 08:27:33 PM
The Z-card idea is excellent!

Should save that for Everton away.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Legion on January 20, 2015, 08:28:28 PM
The Z-card idea is excellent!

Should save that for Everton away.

Applauds.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Jimbo on January 20, 2015, 11:26:23 PM
ZZZ says it all.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 20, 2015, 11:36:50 PM
Something like that would be unique, populist and above all catch the media attention.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 20, 2015, 11:38:46 PM
I'm all for the ZZ cards. I'll bring my own with 'Top' written on it and wear a massive fake beard.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 20, 2015, 11:39:40 PM
Seriously though the Z protest would be a goer for me.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Jimbo on January 20, 2015, 11:42:24 PM
It also doesn't overtly target any individual. it simply says "we're bored", and who among us could argue with that? Leave it to the press to draw their own conclusions.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: cdward on January 20, 2015, 11:44:48 PM
The Liverpool Protest was an utter waste of time because yet again, and ad nauseum (or whatever the Turkish is) the internet warriors think that having 500 likes and 200 favourites and loads of their mates saying how great they are means that the whole of the Holte End loves them and will obviously take part.
 
Although it did show how through popular media such as Facebook and Twitter, you can generate interest from the national mainstream broadcasting media. It was mentioned on nearly all outlets, BBC and Sky TV, local and national radio and newspapers.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Damo70 on January 20, 2015, 11:45:21 PM
ZZZ says it all.

I was going back looking for a post from someone called ZZZ. But now the penny has dropped I agree it is a good idea. Gets a point across with humour rather than venom.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 20, 2015, 11:49:01 PM
It's out there in the open if someone wants to go with it...
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: peter w on January 21, 2015, 12:02:04 AM
Naaah. Go with this one...

Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 21, 2015, 12:08:15 AM
I feel like doing a ZZZZZZ protest every time I see that arrow video it's been posted so often.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: peter w on January 21, 2015, 12:10:26 AM
Still funny
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 21, 2015, 12:21:59 AM
Couldn't resist yanking your chain and being topical at the same time.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 21, 2015, 09:29:49 AM
Talking of protests, sorry I mean demo's, there's some Everton fan on twitter trying to organise a Martinez Out protest/demo before their home against against Liverpool, which apparently includes burning effigy's of Martinez after the game. Anyone who dosen't join in is not a 'true blue' apparently.

https://twitter.com/MartinezOUT_EFC
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: RussellC on January 21, 2015, 09:33:02 AM
Talking of protests, sorry I mean demo's, there's some Everton fan on twitter trying to organise a Martinez Out protest/demo before their home against against Liverpool, which apparently includes burning effigy's of Martinez after the game. Anyone who dosen't join in is not a 'true blue' apparently.

https://twitter.com/MartinezOUT_EFC

I saw that on Twitter and assumed it was a piss-take! Ridiculous.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: Clampy on January 21, 2015, 09:50:55 AM
Talking of protests, sorry I mean demo's, there's some Everton fan on twitter trying to organise a Martinez Out protest/demo before their home against against Liverpool, which apparently includes burning effigy's of Martinez after the game. Anyone who dosen't join in is not a 'true blue' apparently.

https://twitter.com/MartinezOUT_EFC

I saw that on Twitter and assumed it was a piss-take! Ridiculous.

It must be. No-one's stupid enough to expect fans to walk out of a derby after an hour.
Title: Re: Liverpool protest ?
Post by: pbavfckuwait on January 21, 2015, 10:17:52 AM
It would be a protest/ demo that is easily achieved, mainly because you are asking the participants not to have to do alot, surely some of our Support happen to own a printers and would be willing to knock them out, then it is just getting volunteers to hand out the signs prior to dedicated match.
Sorry guys I am in Oman in the Middle East so the only thing you can draw on is my vast knowledge to guide, I wish.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal