Don't get why we're playing Arsenal again, when we've not faced Forest yet. For probably decades, it's always been clubs play everyone in the first half of the season then the reverse fixture in the second half, if it ain't broke don't fix it.
Quote from: Villa Lew on Today at 11:51:11 AMDon't get why we're playing Arsenal again, when we've not faced Forest yet. For probably decades, it's always been clubs play everyone in the first half of the season then the reverse fixture in the second half, if it ain't broke don't fix it.I asked this question several times on various threads. It's doing my head in too! Not only the asymmetry of not having played the full round before meeting Arsenal again, but also the proximity of the home and away fixtures. Did the fixture computer fuck up or summat?
We have to go for a 443 formation. I'd play SJM next to Onana with Tielemans further forward. A conundrum for UE on who to replace Cash with - can he risk Garcia or play Bogarde at RB? Garcia would add more pace but Bogarde is more solid in tackles.
Quote from: Villafirst on Today at 04:31:27 AMWe have to go for a 443 formation. I'd play SJM next to Onana with Tielemans further forward. A conundrum for UE on who to replace Cash with - can he risk Garcia or play Bogarde at RB? Garcia would add more pace but Bogarde is more solid in tackles.No goalkeeper?I love this idea but I do reckon someone will spot the flaw in the proposal.
With the absences if we get anything here it’d be an incredible result. In reality I think they’ll have too much.
Quote from: Villa Lew on Today at 11:51:11 AMDon't get why we're playing Arsenal again, when we've not faced Forest yet. For probably decades, it's always been clubs play everyone in the first half of the season then the reverse fixture in the second half, if it ain't broke don't fix it.It was arranged so that our ream can stay in London after playing Chelsea and do the "10 things to do in London according to Tripadvisor" thing.