Not a fan of those photos unless you achieve something. Lose the next 3 and you look as daft as Newcastle used to.
Quote from: Mister E on Today at 09:53:11 AMQuote from: Rigadon on Today at 09:32:56 AMThe result was a ‘heist’ according to the guardian ‘talking points’. "Villa were very lucky..." Well, maybe but both sides had several chances to score more goals. In the end, Villa's solid defence did its job well. What is more interesting is that Manchester set the team up in way which Villa found difficult to cope with ... which makes the victory even more creditable. The narrative that without Rogers we'd have lost is lazy: yes, he scored one outstanding goal and was well-positioned to score the second, but they were team goals created from good passing and individual skill from other players (McGinn's pass to Rogers for the first should be given far more credit than I've seen / heard / read-about, and Tielemans' persistence and skill for the second was classy). Furthermore, without Heaven's first-half defending display, Villa would have been out of sight.Tim de Lisle, who was also the minute-by-minute guy, literally writes a Man Utd fan Substack.I don't really care about the silly press coverage re us vs. the Big Fucks, but it's got extra silly this weekend I must say.
Quote from: Rigadon on Today at 09:32:56 AMThe result was a ‘heist’ according to the guardian ‘talking points’. "Villa were very lucky..." Well, maybe but both sides had several chances to score more goals. In the end, Villa's solid defence did its job well. What is more interesting is that Manchester set the team up in way which Villa found difficult to cope with ... which makes the victory even more creditable. The narrative that without Rogers we'd have lost is lazy: yes, he scored one outstanding goal and was well-positioned to score the second, but they were team goals created from good passing and individual skill from other players (McGinn's pass to Rogers for the first should be given far more credit than I've seen / heard / read-about, and Tielemans' persistence and skill for the second was classy). Furthermore, without Heaven's first-half defending display, Villa would have been out of sight.
The result was a ‘heist’ according to the guardian ‘talking points’.
I do think the crowd tension might have been reflected a little in that last 20 minutes performance ….you could sense most were just waiting for the ‘inevitable equaliser’ or ‘inevitable penalty’. The roar at the end when Guessand was dribbling and Oliver blew the whistle felt more of an exhaling of breath than a cheer :-) - shows what history does because we weren’t playing Madrid or PSG we were playing a bang average team who played slightly above themselves
That last free kick of theirs had me thinking it's going to happen again.
Quote from: ROBBO on Today at 11:36:58 AMThat last free kick of theirs had me thinking it's going to happen again.There set pieces were awful , luckily
Quote from: Ian. on December 21, 2025, 10:25:53 PMThat’s probably the worst our midfield unit of Kamara, Onana and Tielemans have played in ages, they wasn’t particularly good at hardly anything. They were out bossed for most of the game. However we still probably had the best chances, albeit early on, but we’re still showing we have World beaters in the team, even when off our game.Selection error from Emery for me. Without Torres we have no distributor at the back, an issue made worse by Tielemans playing higher up the pitch. Too easy to press Onana in particular. Tielemans was the worst of the three of them today but the other two weren't much better than their no show last May.
That’s probably the worst our midfield unit of Kamara, Onana and Tielemans have played in ages, they wasn’t particularly good at hardly anything. They were out bossed for most of the game. However we still probably had the best chances, albeit early on, but we’re still showing we have World beaters in the team, even when off our game.
Agreed, but I’d love us to gub someone 10-0