In addition to all the other complaints 532 (and it's definitely a back 5 no matter how often people pretend it's not defensive) is a really dated approach. I've posted about it many, many times now but 325 is THE attacking shape of choice across all 5 major European leagues which means pretty much every decent manager is trying to find a defensive structure that quickly translates into that.
The common solution now, if you play with 3 CBs, is to play with a 343 and your RM and LM are the 2 that move forward. That means most of the team are in roughly the same position in defense and attack and, if you've got the training right the RM and RW are able to cover for each other (and same on the other side) so you're less vulnerable to quick counter attacks. If you need to make a back 4 it'll often be a CM that steps back instead of letting the wide players do all the work as it puts less reliance on them having the engine to get up and down the pitch all game.
The traditional 532 fell out of favour because it is far too easy to isolate the wingbacks. It worked well when a lot of teams played a rigid 442 though because you could outnumber teams through the middle of the pitch and force players out of position. Modern coaches are a bit to savvy to fall for that though and will find way to both counter it and overload you on at least 1 wing.
