Jadon Sancho (loan)

[Chris Harte]

What I've seen of Sancho so far, thinking of the Go Ahead game and one of the other European games earlier in the season, he's keen to have the ball but doesn't seem to know when to release it. That or he's unwilling to release it.

[AV82EC]

FFS, How about we all stop scapegoating the lad and get behind him. He wasn’t stand out today but he wasn’t atrocious and contributed to our win. After a great team win why does someone have to be the punchbag.

[Chris Harte]

Why do you think he's being scapegoated?

[ldavfc4eva]

Could have scored today, did well to get round his man and get a shot away before Donnarumma saved and then saved again.

If he had scored that goal then we would be saying he had a great impact and the future looks bright,

[JUAN PABLO]

I thought he was ok , he isnt match fit but we won and he played some part in that .  Some people was saying guessand was the worse footballer they had ever seen on Thursday and today they are saying he has done great . He doesnt lose the ball much at least .  Give him time .

[john e]

FFS, How about we all stop scapegoating the lad and get behind him. He wasn’t stand out today but he wasn’t atrocious and contributed to our win. After a great team win why does someone have to be the punchbag.

Because he was absolutely woeful

[PaulWinch again]

No he wasn’t.

[AV82EC]

FFS, How about we all stop scapegoating the lad and get behind him. He wasn’t stand out today but he wasn’t atrocious and contributed to our win. After a great team win why does someone have to be the punchbag.

Because he was absolutely woeful

Sorry John but that’s just hyperbolic bullshit.

[Monty]

Overall not phenomenal but he did have some proper moments.

[john e]

FFS, How about we all stop scapegoating the lad and get behind him. He wasn’t stand out today but he wasn’t atrocious and contributed to our win. After a great team win why does someone have to be the punchbag.

Because he was absolutely woeful

Sorry John but that’s just hyperbolic bullshit.

Fair enough but Unai thought the same
I know he used the excuse of minutes to be kind but if Sancho was doing his job properly he would’ve stayed on
He had him away because he became a liability and we had a game to win, you call it hyperbole I call it good management

With respect I’d rather trust Unai’s judgment than yours

[paul_e]

Trust his judgement but refuse to accept what he said as truth.

[pauliewalnuts]

People not understanding the meaning of the word 'scapegoat' again.

[john e]

Trust his judgement but refuse to accept what he said as truth.

He subbed a sub
Pretend all you like but I’m not as gullible as you

[Stu82]

Could have scored today, did well to get round his man and get a shot away before Donnarumma saved and then saved again.

If he had scored that goal then we would be saying he had a great impact and the future looks bright,

Think he did really well there, but if he’d looked up and played ball across 6 yd box, Ollie was free for tap in.

[brontebilly]

Emery might be deflecting I suppose, but the truth seems more plausible. He didn’t have a pre-season and lost a week or two with us so I can understand why Emery is managing his minutes.

There's little or no chance Emery had in his head that he would only give Sancho 40 mins when he brought him on. He's being kind there. What I would say is in the previous occasions, which in the cases of Bailey and Buendia were a lot harsher, it happened those players were given chances very quickly again afterwards. Sancho could be back in very quickly again.