He was totally at fault for their goal but has been adequate in general. Can’t wait for Torres to return as Lindelof is his equally defensively but no where near as good at starting our attacks.
I wonder if we'll try and move Ty on in the summer.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on January 03, 2026, 11:45:22 PMI wonder if we'll try and move Ty on in the summer.And leave ourselves with 3 centre backs?
Quote from: Drummond on January 04, 2026, 12:09:20 AMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on January 03, 2026, 11:45:22 PMI wonder if we'll try and move Ty on in the summer.And leave ourselves with 3 centre backs? I wouldn’t be moving Ty anywhere. He’s a very fit man and has 2 maybe 3 more seasons in him at this level if he can keep injury free. He’d have controlled the area in the game v Arsenal. His heading ability and presence for set pieces are invaluable. Lindelof is a decent player, gets us and knows his position well. UE will improve him like he improves all players who are in his squad.
Quote from: Rigadon on January 03, 2026, 04:20:37 PMWas at fault a bit for their goal today but he’s been generally solid. You have to wonder about players who don’t improve under Emery. Most do and he seems to have. Harsh for me. The Forest player made towards the ball and “dummies”. If that’s not interfering with play I don’t know what is. No idea why offside wasn’t even mentioned.
Was at fault a bit for their goal today but he’s been generally solid. You have to wonder about players who don’t improve under Emery. Most do and he seems to have.
Quote from: Rigadon on January 03, 2026, 04:20:37 PMWas at fault a bit for their goal today but he’s been generally solid. You have to wonder about players who don’t improve under Emery. Most do and he seems to have. We were talking today about players who have left us under Emery. Have any actually improved? Players improve under his guidance but afterwards then what?
Good player. Would be happy if he started 38 games tbh.
I wouldn’t sell Mings. Your point is valid that he is on a downward trajectory but the money received (not much) versus the money needed to replace him (lots) means I’d keep him. He’s also taken a pay-cut which illustrate his commitment to ‘the project’.In an ideal world we’d have an 20 year old developing in the youth system/on loan ready to replace him.