Victor Lindelöf

[aj2k77]

Fuck Lindelof and fuck whoever's idea it is to sign him.

[Goldenballs]

Can he play RB?

[Drummond]

Can he play RB?

He's played there before

[Skipper_The_Eyechild]

We'll be on the up with the Swedish Maldini in our team.

*needle drops from arm.

[BoVillan esq]

Can he play RB?

Listening to the comments today they think he will probably be a bench player, back up.

[garyellis]

They are as we need to be net positive. I'd rather our back up centre half was free so we can spend any money elsewhere personally.

Wages are our biggest problem right now not transfer fees.

Read this and come back when you understand it
Fine:
A £9.5 million fine was issued in July 2025.
Conditional Fine:
A further £12.9 million fine is conditional on the club's compliance with the financial roadmap over the next three years.
Positive Transfer Balance:
For the 2025/26 and 2026/27 seasons, Villa must generate more income from player sales than they spend on new signings to register players for UEFA competitions.
Squad Cost Ratio:
The club's spending on player wages and transfers must be reduced to below 70% of its revenue for the 2025/26 season and continue on a downward trend.

it’s all a problem but as the first post stated it’s net spend not just wages. The main problem is income not wages. If you want to keep players like Kamara and Watkins you have to pay the going rate. Jacob left for higher wages not less.

Not disagreeing with it all being a problem. Free transfers tend to come with higher salaries for the player because their agent will be arguing that the interested party don’t have to spend a transfer fee. It’s likely that sometimes a lower transfer fee for a player with less wages is better for these rules, because the fee can be amortized over the length of a contract as we all know. So I don’t think it’s necessarily a case of us creating a problem on both elements with buying a player.

Wages is the harder problem to solve because ultimately, a player doesn’t care about how much someone is paying for them but they care about signing on fee and wages they get and keeping our best players means paying more for wages.

Often one player sale can solve the positive transfer balance issue. But getting the wages down to 70% whilst competing is much much harder.

Context is everything especially on a forum and I agree with the limitation's. The rules are fixed and not in our favour but us and Newcastle will not let the status quo exist without a significant challenge and City are still to be sorted Shit now but all to play for.
Shit

[cdbearsfan]

Can he play RB?

He could, presumably, play centre-half allowing Konsa to operate at right back.

I'm not sure if either brontebilly or Percy have ever discussed the potential merits of such a proposal.

[Brazilian Villain]

Can he play RB?

Unsure, but he probably will.

[Demitri_C]

So we "gazumped" florentina and everton for him. Basically  means we offeref more in wages.

Reckless from a club that has wages issues? I honestly cannot  understand  the idiotic  decision making by monchi

[Dave]

oh gosh does that mean we will keep Olsen 😳😃

No, but it does mean we're bringing back Augustinsson.

Yeah, he does seem to have an eye for not-very-good Swedes.

Chalk up another bit of evidence.