collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Palace post match BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO by Stu82
[Today at 11:19:32 PM]


Donyell Malen by rob_bridge
[Today at 11:18:58 PM]


Evann Guessand by PeterWithe
[Today at 11:18:42 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Villafirst
[Today at 11:18:22 PM]


Emi Buendia by LeonW
[Today at 11:12:13 PM]


Emi Martinez by Somniloquism
[Today at 11:07:26 PM]


Unai Emery by PaulWinch again
[Today at 11:02:43 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Smithy
[Today at 10:56:49 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Victor Lindelöf  (Read 4692 times)

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11850
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #120 on: Today at 06:29:01 PM »
He’ll be on a massive wedge. Finances aren’t an excuse with this one.

Offline Mellin

  • Member
  • Posts: 2456
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Leicestershire
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #121 on: Today at 06:31:56 PM »
They are as we need to be net positive. I'd rather our back up centre half was free so we can spend any money elsewhere personally.

Online LeonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 2123
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #122 on: Today at 06:32:41 PM »
They are as we need to be net positive. I'd rather our back up centre half was free so we can spend any money elsewhere personally.

Wages are our biggest problem right now not transfer fees.

Online garyellis

  • Member
  • Posts: 1444
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #123 on: Today at 06:41:13 PM »
They are as we need to be net positive. I'd rather our back up centre half was free so we can spend any money elsewhere personally.

Wages are our biggest problem right now not transfer fees.
Read this and come back when you understand it
Fine:
A £9.5 million fine was issued in July 2025.
Conditional Fine:
A further £12.9 million fine is conditional on the club's compliance with the financial roadmap over the next three years.
Positive Transfer Balance:
For the 2025/26 and 2026/27 seasons, Villa must generate more income from player sales than they spend on new signings to register players for UEFA competitions.
Squad Cost Ratio:
The club's spending on player wages and transfers must be reduced to below 70% of its revenue for the 2025/26 season and continue on a downward trend.

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11850
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #124 on: Today at 06:41:46 PM »
Yep we’re fucked on wages. Lindelof adds to the problem of too many shit Monchi signings on a wedge adding little.

Online LeonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 2123
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #125 on: Today at 06:48:54 PM »
They are as we need to be net positive. I'd rather our back up centre half was free so we can spend any money elsewhere personally.

Wages are our biggest problem right now not transfer fees.
Read this and come back when you understand it
Fine:
A £9.5 million fine was issued in July 2025.
Conditional Fine:
A further £12.9 million fine is conditional on the club's compliance with the financial roadmap over the next three years.
Positive Transfer Balance:
For the 2025/26 and 2026/27 seasons, Villa must generate more income from player sales than they spend on new signings to register players for UEFA competitions.
Squad Cost Ratio:
The club's spending on player wages and transfers must be reduced to below 70% of its revenue for the 2025/26 season and continue on a downward trend.

So…I’m interpreting your post that based upon the above, you don’t think wages are the bigger problem for the club to address?

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12320
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #126 on: Today at 06:49:01 PM »
One thing the wages i don't get we were payjng asensio and rashford on loan. That must ahve been 300k a week at least. So they have both left thats a significant  wage amount off our wage structure. Add the players that have already left. Our wage bill must be significantly lower now

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 76224
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #127 on: Today at 06:49:19 PM »
I doubt that at his age and with how little interest there was in him that he'll be on a wedge, by PL standards anyway.

Online Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 8491
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #128 on: Today at 06:50:37 PM »
One thing the wages i don't get we were payjng asensio and rashford on loan. That must ahve been 300k a week at least. So they have both left thats a significant  wage amount off our wage structure. Add the players that have already left. Our wage bill must be significantly lower now
Hence Lindelof. Are you not entertained?

Offline Dante Lavelli

  • Member
  • Posts: 10814
  • GM : 25.05.2023
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #129 on: Today at 06:54:17 PM »
I think I’d prefer Lindleof over Diasi, seems less risky and less invested.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55504
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #130 on: Today at 06:55:29 PM »
I’d rather have someone good, but we are where we are.

Offline IFWaters

  • Member
  • Posts: 2032
  • Location: down south
  • GM : Sep, 2012
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #131 on: Today at 07:37:12 PM »
Thinking positively, he sounds like a high-end chocolatier, so maybe the commercial dept. can come up with something e.g. Lindelof's Trinity Truffles.
I'm sold.

Online garyellis

  • Member
  • Posts: 1444
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #132 on: Today at 07:58:56 PM »
They are as we need to be net positive. I'd rather our back up centre half was free so we can spend any money elsewhere personally.

Wages are our biggest problem right now not transfer fees.
Read this and come back when you understand it
Fine:
A £9.5 million fine was issued in July 2025.
Conditional Fine:
A further £12.9 million fine is conditional on the club's compliance with the financial roadmap over the next three years.
Positive Transfer Balance:
For the 2025/26 and 2026/27 seasons, Villa must generate more income from player sales than they spend on new signings to register players for UEFA competitions.
Squad Cost Ratio:
The club's spending on player wages and transfers must be reduced to below 70% of its revenue for the 2025/26 season and continue on a downward trend.

it’s all a problem but as the first post stated it’s net spend not just wages. The main problem is income not wages. If you want to keep players like Kamara and Watkins you have to pay the going rate. Jacob left for higher wages not less.

Online LeonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 2123
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #133 on: Today at 08:11:09 PM »
They are as we need to be net positive. I'd rather our back up centre half was free so we can spend any money elsewhere personally.

Wages are our biggest problem right now not transfer fees.
Read this and come back when you understand it
Fine:
A £9.5 million fine was issued in July 2025.
Conditional Fine:
A further £12.9 million fine is conditional on the club's compliance with the financial roadmap over the next three years.
Positive Transfer Balance:
For the 2025/26 and 2026/27 seasons, Villa must generate more income from player sales than they spend on new signings to register players for UEFA competitions.
Squad Cost Ratio:
The club's spending on player wages and transfers must be reduced to below 70% of its revenue for the 2025/26 season and continue on a downward trend.

it’s all a problem but as the first post stated it’s net spend not just wages. The main problem is income not wages. If you want to keep players like Kamara and Watkins you have to pay the going rate. Jacob left for higher wages not less.

Not disagreeing with it all being a problem. Free transfers tend to come with higher salaries for the player because their agent will be arguing that the interested party don’t have to spend a transfer fee. It’s likely that sometimes a lower transfer fee for a player with less wages is better for these rules, because the fee can be amortized over the length of a contract as we all know. So I don’t think it’s necessarily a case of us creating a problem on both elements with buying a player.

Wages is the harder problem to solve because ultimately, a player doesn’t care about how much someone is paying for them but they care about signing on fee and wages they get and keeping our best players means paying more for wages.

Often one player sale can solve the positive transfer balance issue. But getting the wages down to 70% whilst competing is much much harder.

Offline Rigadon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9074
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: Victor Lindelöf
« Reply #134 on: Today at 08:32:29 PM »
Good job we have Victor coming in eh.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal