collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 11:41:24 PM]


Leander Dendoncker by stevo_st
[Today at 11:19:09 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by brontebilly
[Today at 10:46:28 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:35:07 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:30:55 PM]


Boxing 2025 by Villa Lew
[Today at 09:57:18 PM]


Kits 25/26 by VillaTim
[Today at 09:56:02 PM]


Lucas Digne by PaulWinch again
[Today at 09:03:42 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 11:41:24 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Olneythelonely
[Today at 11:37:40 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 11:37:07 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by VillaTim
[Today at 11:28:48 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by stevo_st
[Today at 11:19:09 PM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by Somniloquism
[Today at 11:08:53 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by PeterWithe
[Today at 11:00:00 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by PeterWithe
[Today at 10:55:11 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.  (Read 13657 times)

Offline markeeeebeeee2005

  • Member
  • Posts: 1793
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #150 on: November 23, 2024, 10:48:14 PM »
On the Diaby debate. Is he better than Philogene? Undoubtedly. Therefore the squad is weaker in that area without him and with Philogene. We shouldn’t have taken Philogene back and I don’t really know why Diaby left. I assume he wanted to go for the cash.

Offline Meanwood Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8604
  • GM : PCM
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #151 on: November 23, 2024, 10:51:34 PM »
I think we wanted/needed the cash too

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29182
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #152 on: November 23, 2024, 10:59:43 PM »
I just don't look at a team that can't stop conceding, especially after losing the ball too easily and not pressing enough on the transition, and think 'man, this team needs Moussa Diaby'.

Online tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15415
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #153 on: November 23, 2024, 11:01:35 PM »
Diaby is the last player we miss. Seriously, put him immediately in this team, tell me what changes?

Rogers is better.

 i think he would have scored more goals than rogers will this season.

He is also faster and far better at getting the ball forward quicker.  Rogers is veey good dont get me wrong. But its not in rogers spot its baileys. Rogers and diaby in same team on form is a dangerous team.

Baileys been generally rubbish this year diaby would be well ahead of him this season.

We are missing him and pretty badly. Him and luiz in my opinion

You just need to look at how many goals our midfielders have scored this season comapred to last

I'm guessing that the thinking was thar Rogers would be the 'number 10' this season with Buendia and others able to provide cover.  On the right we had Bailey and Philogene, so they might have concluded that Diaby was expendable.  Who knows, Diaby might have pushed for the move.

On paper that would have probably looked fine at the start of the season, problem is that most of the current options are either out of form or look like they don't really belong at the level sadly. 

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54891
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #154 on: November 23, 2024, 11:01:39 PM »
I just don't look at a team that can't stop conceding, especially after losing the ball too easily and not pressing enough on the transition, and think 'man, this team needs Moussa Diaby'.

It’s not binary though - the main problem is our midfield is not doing its job, it’s as simple as that. But we lack options to change games as well, Diaby would bring that. He’s gone though, the problem is we haven’t adequately replaced him.

Offline Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12124
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #155 on: November 23, 2024, 11:02:05 PM »
Unpopular but i think id rather have cashed in on either youri JJ (that would have been massive profit) or duran. (But not for the 40m that was quoted in summer)

Durans not been great since he signed his new contract. The contract curse!

I was gutted when diabs left. Ii really rated him

This summer if JJs injury problems dont go away id consider selling for a massive profit this will keep us sweet for years. Also allow us to get better players than philiogene in

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29182
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #156 on: November 23, 2024, 11:02:46 PM »
So...you'd rather have sold three better players?

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29182
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #157 on: November 23, 2024, 11:03:15 PM »
I just don't look at a team that can't stop conceding, especially after losing the ball too easily and not pressing enough on the transition, and think 'man, this team needs Moussa Diaby'.

It’s not binary though - the main problem is our midfield is not doing its job, it’s as simple as that. But we lack options to change games as well, Diaby would bring that. He’s gone though, the problem is we haven’t adequately replaced him.

We'd have less need of changing games if we actually had a middle of the pitch!

Offline Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12124
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #158 on: November 23, 2024, 11:03:25 PM »
So...you'd rather have sold three better players?

No one of the three

Id have also been ok if we cashed in on cash

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29182
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #159 on: November 23, 2024, 11:03:52 PM »
So...you'd rather have sold three better players?

No one of the three

So you agree that they're all better than Diaby?

Offline Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12124
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #160 on: November 23, 2024, 11:05:43 PM »
So...you'd rather have sold three better players?

No one of the three

So you agree that they're all better than Diaby?

Nope

Im saying id rather have kept diaby and sold one of those three instead.

I loved diaby. Watching his run and scaring the shit out of defenders was a real joy to watch.

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29182
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #161 on: November 23, 2024, 11:07:13 PM »
They were usually a lot less scared when they saw what he did with it!

Sorry Dem, sure he was a better option than Philogene but he definitely underdelivered in my view. I really don't think his absence is much to be looked at here.

Online tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15415
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #162 on: November 23, 2024, 11:09:46 PM »
I just don't look at a team that can't stop conceding, especially after losing the ball too easily and not pressing enough on the transition, and think 'man, this team needs Moussa Diaby'.

Looking at it today, the set up off attacking corners is just asking for trouble really.  Our last defenders were almost on the edge of the opposition box, meaning the likes of McGinn who occupy those positions have a 70 yard foot race with players much quicker than them (I thought we looked slow all over the pitch today) if the opposition break. 

It's cost us again today and I can't believe it hadn't been rectified after happening a few times at Liverpool. 

Offline Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12124
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #163 on: November 23, 2024, 11:11:17 PM »
Diaby is the last player we miss. Seriously, put him immediately in this team, tell me what changes?

Rogers is better.

 i think he would have scored more goals than rogers will this season.

He is also faster and far better at getting the ball forward quicker.  Rogers is veey good dont get me wrong. But its not in rogers spot its baileys. Rogers and diaby in same team on form is a dangerous team.

Baileys been generally rubbish this year diaby would be well ahead of him this season.

We are missing him and pretty badly. Him and luiz in my opinion

You just need to look at how many goals our midfielders have scored this season comapred to last

I'm guessing that the thinking was thar Rogers would be the 'number 10' this season with Buendia and others able to provide cover.  On the right we had Bailey and Philogene, so they might have concluded that Diaby was expendable.  Who knows, Diaby might have pushed for the move.

On paper that would have probably looked fine at the start of the season, problem is that most of the current options are either out of form or look like they don't really belong at the level sadly.

Yeah i agree with that To. Buendia is literally offering nothing. I think he will be moved on in the summer as clearly we have moved on from him.now

Yeah we dont know what happened behind scenes with diaby but me speculating it was the club as the whole wages issue we had with CL. We had to get rid of a high earner. Im sure diabs wouldnt have minded anyway earning more in a shitter league though.

Just a  shame he hasnt been replaced.  I said this earlier but sarr cost 12m and man he would really add something to our team. Looks far better than bailey is at the moment . What a bargain for palace

Online tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15415
Re: Aston Villa 2 Crystal Palace 2. Post Match Thread.
« Reply #164 on: November 23, 2024, 11:14:56 PM »
They were usually a lot less scared when they saw what he did with it!

Sorry Dem, sure he was a better option than Philogene but he definitely underdelivered in my view. I really don't think his absence is much to be looked at here.

I'd agree with this.  He started brightly last season, but had a dip in form and wasn't really a regular starter in the 2nd half of the season.  After that experience, he probably thought he wouldn't turn the Saudi money down again.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal