Quote from: Monty on October 27, 2024, 03:08:48 PMYeah it looks clearly, if just, out to me. Thought so immediately at the time.it looked out to me in real time hence i didn't do a lap round the living room frightening the other occupants
Yeah it looks clearly, if just, out to me. Thought so immediately at the time.
Does anyone know what the precise rule is re when VAR can intervene?
Semenyo dives quite obviously.
Does anyone know what the precise rule is re when VAR can intervene?The decision from the match officials was that Watkins kept the ball in and that McGinn scored. Then it is claimed that VAR overruled because of 'factual evidence'.Though if it is not Hawkeye or other technology, then is it 'factual' or simply the VAR official offering an opinion?That strikes me as the VAR stepping beyond their remit and making decisions for the match officials. UTV
We used five subs. Kamara for Watkins was the obvious defending a lead change, nobody is leaving two forwards on at that stage.
In Cash's defence he had 2022 version Bailey in front of him for support . No wonder they targeted that side more . Once McGinn and Rogers went off we lost all physicality in midfield and they just strolled through. .