Quote from: PeterWithe on June 19, 2024, 09:06:23 AMI read and agreed with something here about Lerner, for years we needed a very rich owner but the moment we got one it wasn’t enough anymore. Other clubs got the wealth of whole countries. One club did.
I read and agreed with something here about Lerner, for years we needed a very rich owner but the moment we got one it wasn’t enough anymore. Other clubs got the wealth of whole countries.
Xia was a conman that did time. Lerner was a billionaire, well intentioned but not a smart football club owner.
Quote from: nigel on June 19, 2024, 01:18:39 PMI thinly liken the Lerner years as an owner to the Bruce years as a manager.We were in deep sh!t when they came in and, basically, saved us.In both cases we were probably in a better position when they left, but we were glad to see the back of them.We were definitely not in a better place when Lerner left compared to where we were when he bought us. He left us in the Championship and sold us to an absolute chancer. Some "custodian".We had some decent years when Lerner was spending, and we were once again relevant, with some decent players; but his failing was that he knew nothing about football or the business, and didn't get anyone of sufficient quality of knowhow to administer the club, and he himself failed to provide any long-term vision or strategy - or even the basic idea of how to run a professional football club.MON was basically just Steve Bruce with a bigger budget. There was no long-term planning or strategy; and he generally pissed Randy's cash up the wall with too many middle of the road signings (and admittedly a few excellent ones). No youth development, no squad rotation - same selection every week, and then left us in the lurch.
I thinly liken the Lerner years as an owner to the Bruce years as a manager.We were in deep sh!t when they came in and, basically, saved us.In both cases we were probably in a better position when they left, but we were glad to see the back of them.
Quote from: cdward on June 19, 2024, 09:22:25 AMGreat read. Interesting that Lerner was only 44 when he became a billionaire from his fathers inheritance.At the time i remember being full of optimism as Ellis was no longer going to be holding us back. I wonder what would have been if Randy Lerner hadn't got a divorce.I don't think - at least I was told by someone close to the scene- that the financial implications of the divorce affected him much. What did for him was the effect on his son and his new, Anglophobic, woman.
Great read. Interesting that Lerner was only 44 when he became a billionaire from his fathers inheritance.At the time i remember being full of optimism as Ellis was no longer going to be holding us back. I wonder what would have been if Randy Lerner hadn't got a divorce.
I feel the same Stu. Then I remember how there was still a sizeable rump of the support that still thought well of Ellis' running of the club throughout the 90's and into the 00's, presumably for his part on the late 60's.Oh and you're giving me 10 years I think so if you feel old where does that put me?
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on June 24, 2024, 06:37:03 PMI feel the same Stu. Then I remember how there was still a sizeable rump of the support that still thought well of Ellis' running of the club throughout the 90's and into the 00's, presumably for his part on the late 60's.Oh and you're giving me 10 years I think so if you feel old where does that put me?I’m 44 next month, you can’t be in your mid-fifties!
Did anyone on here write the "Young Doug' comic strip that used to be printed in the fanzine?