collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:35:40 PM]


Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by brontebilly
[Today at 02:34:04 PM]


Aston Villa vs Chelsea pre match - March 4th 7.30pm by Tuscans
[Today at 02:31:29 PM]


FFP by Tuscans
[Today at 02:30:00 PM]


I'll tell you what else I don't like by Hopadop
[Today at 02:08:09 PM]


Jadon Sancho (loan) by Hookeysmith
[Today at 01:56:33 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Hookeysmith
[Today at 01:36:07 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by SW9-VILLA
[Today at 01:24:48 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Standard of Refereeing  (Read 89477 times)

Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36464
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1125 on: March 02, 2026, 09:01:22 PM »
Chris Foy defending refs shock. Quite ironic I have an advert for an eye check within the article as well.

Offline Goldenballs

  • Member
  • Posts: 3143
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1126 on: March 02, 2026, 09:20:46 PM »
https://x.com/i/status/2028176857791672725

Here's another view, if you want to get even more pissed off. Ludicrous.

Online LeonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 2285
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1127 on: Today at 02:49:48 AM »
Many of us having been calling out these consistent inconsistencies for months. These aren’t just occasional instances; it’s almost every single week; shocking decisions made against non fancied media teams Vs shocking decisions made in favour of fancied media teams. There’s not even the opportunity to start to forget about it because they happen every match week.

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19022
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 17.02.2027
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1128 on: Today at 07:52:27 AM »



Fucking pathetic.
That is beyond parody - holy fucking moly.

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19022
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 17.02.2027
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1129 on: Today at 07:56:02 AM »
https://x.com/i/status/2028176857791672725

Here's another view, if you want to get even more pissed off. Ludicrous.
Okay, so Lacroix shouldn't have a hand anywhere near Cunha, but that is - as it looked first time on Sunday - a clear dive, for which a yellow card should have been given and a free kick to CP. End of.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35170
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 17.10.2026
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1130 on: Today at 09:22:17 AM »
Webb should be at Stockley Park for every game, supervising every decision, until they start sorting it out.


Online Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36464
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1131 on: Today at 09:29:16 AM »



Fucking pathetic.
That is beyond parody - holy fucking moly.

Well it is just a parody or "fake" isn't it? VAR very rarely release anything these days as the lauded transparency has disappeared along with the review program they used to do, and definitely not within 24 hours after a game. If someone links to a credible source for the comments in the screen shot I might be less cynical about it.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 38813
  • Age: 46
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1132 on: Today at 11:35:40 AM »
I've watched that a few times now and I just can't work out how the ref isn't able to see it's a clear dive. I just can't understand how that can happen at the same time that there's wrestling at every corner that's being allowed to go uncontested. Just in our games since Christmas there's 7-8 examples of far more contact being allowed, if you broaden it to all games for all clubs this season there'd have been hundreds of extra free kicks and penalties given if this is the threshold.

This comes back to the problem I've had for ages, there's just no consistency it must be a nightmare for players right now not knowing what is going to be allowed or not.

Offline eye digress

  • Member
  • Posts: 1125
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1133 on: Today at 11:50:57 AM »
Agreed paul_e. I could buy that it was a foul if we were regularly seeing freekicks and penos given for this type of contact.

But what we are seeing instead is mass wrestling at corners and a general encouragement to "let the game flow", together with VAR checks that often seem to dismissed due to "insignificant contact". Because of that general trend, I have been mentally raising the bar on what a peno could be and, as a result, I was shocked at the decision on Sunday.



Online Nev

  • Member
  • Posts: 16506
  • Location: Vibrania
  • GM : 03.02.2022
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1134 on: Today at 12:14:22 PM »
"not enough contact" is the same as "different phase of play" in that there are no set parameters, so there can be no correct decision - it's a subjective one made by the official. Therefore the decision can be made to suit any set of circumstances.

Offline Hookeysmith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13693
  • Age: 62
  • Location: One hand on the handle of the mad / sane door
  • GM : 09.02.2027
Re: Standard of Refereeing
« Reply #1135 on: Today at 01:36:07 PM »
Add that level of bullshit (the Chuna challenge) to the constant man handling in the penalty box at corners is becoming a joke. It seems as Arsenal are to win the league with tactics Pulis and Warnock would be fully erect over and the rules are being applied in completely different levels depending on who is playing.

The whole game sucks at the moment

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal