Fulham 1-2 Aston Villa post match pint

[SamTheMouse]

Fulham are a wank stain of a football club.

Really? I can't see much objectionable about them, to be honest. Silva's histrionics are a bit annoying but apart from that they generally seem a decent lot.

[kippaxvilla2]

Good of Sky soccer Saturday to choose not to review our game afterwards and instead concentrate on mid table games at Forest and Newcastle instead.

[Somniloquism]

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/12606/13074141/fulham-1-2-aston-villa-premier-league-highlights

[Somniloquism]

they drew a line off Baileys foot which was bizarre antics

Nah they didn't. It looked that because the red line was on Baileys foot, but there is a dotted line they added to Moreno which blended in with his shirt on the still.

[Mister E]

There’s not a centre half in the league I’d swap for Torres

not even MaGuire?!

[AlexAlexCropley]

they drew a line off Baileys foot which was bizarre antics

Nah they didn't. It looked that because the red line was on Baileys foot, but there is a dotted line they added to Moreno which blended in with his shirt on the still.

Do you say he's on or off?

[eamonn]

they drew a line off Baileys foot which was bizarre antics

Nah they didn't. It looked that because the red line was on Baileys foot, but there is a dotted line they added to Moreno which blended in with his shirt on the still.

So do you think he was on or off?

[TonyD]

Good of Sky soccer Saturday to choose not to review our game afterwards and instead concentrate on mid table games at Forest and Newcastle instead.

No HYS on the BBC match report. 

[Somniloquism]

they drew a line off Baileys foot which was bizarre antics

Nah they didn't. It looked that because the red line was on Baileys foot, but there is a dotted line they added to Moreno which blended in with his shirt on the still.

So do you think he was on or off?

My personal opinion, it was a very close call and the lines could have given it or not depending on where they were drawn, however if we didn't have VAR, it was still a disallowed goal as that was the on-pitch decision. But not sure on the pile on when I was just correcting Tims mistaken belief (which I also though during the match) that it was Bailey who was judged when it wasn't.

[OCD]

they drew a line off Baileys foot which was bizarre antics

Nah they didn't. It looked that because the red line was on Baileys foot, but there is a dotted line they added to Moreno which blended in with his shirt on the still.

This shows otherwise

[Demitri_C]

Good of Sky soccer Saturday to choose not to review our game afterwards and instead concentrate on mid table games at Forest and Newcastle instead.

Good. I prefer when we stay under the radar. We did better when people were ignoring us. Let it remain that way!

[Somniloquism]

Can you see the dotted line right next to the 1 on Moreno?

[Ian.]

If you ignore Bailey, the defender is keeping Moreno onside?

[eamonn]

they drew a line off Baileys foot which was bizarre antics

Nah they didn't. It looked that because the red line was on Baileys foot, but there is a dotted line they added to Moreno which blended in with his shirt on the still.

So do you think he was on or off?

My personal opinion, it was a very close call and the lines could have given it or not depending on where they were drawn, however if we didn't have VAR, it was still a disallowed goal as that was the on-pitch decision. But not sure on the pile on when I was just correcting Tims mistaken belief (which I also though during the match) that it was Bailey who was judged when it wasn't.

Not piling-on, I only saw the last half hour so was interested if it was an obvious error or not.

[Deano's Mullet]

City losing