Joe Gauci (on loan to Port Vale)

[Footy-Vill]

It's disheartening that after I mentioned my user experience here, some of those posts are really hostile.
 Not Drummond, though, so I appreciate you taking the time to write with some humility and perspective.
But Drummond, I believe you're missing the whole point of letting me or anybody else discuss, share, and talk about thoughts, and it appears you're advocating limitations on concepts and ideas.

That's not really on because everyone can have intuitive experiences, and if I find anything related to Villa to talk about, then that's what I will talk about. Let's all write respectfully, but according to our individual preferences. Thank you. I believe that at this point, notwithstanding individual differences in opinion, everyone will be in agreement.

[Clark W Griswold]

I believe that at this point, notwithstanding individual differences in opinion, everyone will be in agreement.

Errrrr, OK then.

[Risso]

It's disheartening that after I mentioned my user experience here, some of those posts are really hostile.
 Not Drummond, though, so I appreciate you taking the time to write with some humility and perspective.
But Drummond, I believe you're missing the whole point of letting me or anybody else discuss, share, and talk about thoughts, and it appears you're advocating limitations on concepts and ideas.

That's not really on because everyone can have intuitive experiences, and if I find anything related to Villa to talk about, then that's what I will talk about. Let's all write respectfully, but according to our individual preferences. Thank you. I believe that at this point, notwithstanding individual differences in opinion, everyone will be in agreement.

You're free to post what you like, but then by the same token everybody's free to call you out on it if they think it's nonsense.

People can and do disagree about whether they think Diaby will improve next season for example, or if Cash needs replacing or whatever. Absolutely nobody at all is going to take a post seriously saying that Rogers is taking the piss in training because he picked up a hamstring injury, or that Gauci is likely to play because you had a dream about three magpies, or other nonsense like that. If you're going to post stuff like that, well you can expect to get picked up on it, and because you post it so regularly, people are pissed off with it and aren't always going to be that polite when responding. Up to you really.

[PaulWinch again]

People can agree and disagree, and it’s fine provided it doesn’t cross into unpleasantness. From my perspective Footy, my frustration with some of your posts is that you present them as if you either have superior knowledge or intelligence when compared to others. The reality though is that your “insight” is typically regurgitating publicly available stats, and potentially overlaying your opinion on top. That’s fine, but it’s not some mystical prescience that you’ve come up with, so don’t present it as such. Also you have a tendency to play it up when a result comes to pass, but then be pretty silent when you’re wrong.

[Somniloquism]

People can agree and disagree, and it’s fine provided it doesn’t cross into unpleasantness. From my perspective Footy, my frustration with some of your posts is that you present them as if you either have superior knowledge or intelligence when compared to others. The reality though is that your “insight” is typically regurgitating publicly available stats, and potentially overlaying your opinion on top. That’s fine, but it’s not some mystical prescience that you’ve come up with, so don’t present it as such. Also you have a tendency to play it up when a result comes to pass, but then be pretty silent when you’re wrong.

I would also mention the smug "insight" one of the 10 things happen, but no reference to any of the other 15 predictions. The recent one of that is almost Gauci, but no mention of the Watkins prediction.

[Percy McCarthy]

From my perspective Footy, my frustration with some of your posts is that you present them as if you either have superior knowledge or intelligence when compared to others.

Yes, this is it from my perspective too. Especially when what he/they post(s) is usually completely devoid of knowledge and intelligence, superior or otherwise. Just a diatribe of utter nonsense.

[Footy-Vill]

It's disheartening that after I mentioned my user experience here, some of those posts are really hostile.
 Not Drummond, though, so I appreciate you taking the time to write with some humility and perspective.
But Drummond, I believe you're missing the whole point of letting me or anybody else discuss, share, and talk about thoughts, and it appears you're advocating limitations on concepts and ideas.

That's not really on because everyone can have intuitive experiences, and if I find anything related to Villa to talk about, then that's what I will talk about. Let's all write respectfully, but according to our individual preferences. Thank you. I believe that at this point, notwithstanding individual differences in opinion, everyone will be in agreement.

You're free to post what you like, but then by the same token everybody's free to call you out on it if they think it's nonsense.

People can and do disagree about whether they think Diaby will improve next season for example, or if Cash needs replacing or whatever. Absolutely nobody at all is going to take a post seriously saying that Rogers is taking the piss in training because he picked up a hamstring injury, or that Gauci is likely to play because you had a dream about three magpies, or other nonsense like that. If you're going to post stuff like that, well you can expect to get picked up on it, and because you post it so regularly, people are pissed off with it and aren't always going to be that polite when responding. Up to you really.

1. This is not the Ginger thread ! Which has descended into disgustingly explicit and filthy content that moderators need to address!
2. Appreciate your view and words however there's a big difference to picked on and picked up on! I think validating how I'm feeling and respecting me as an individual is all I ask.
3. I think these 3 points are understood and we all want 3 points on Monday.
Thank You let's move on and focus on the relevancy of discussing all things Gaucci.

[Risso]

Or you could all just double down on it I suppose. Whatever.

[Percy McCarthy]

It's disheartening that after I mentioned my user experience here, some of those posts are really hostile.
 Not Drummond, though, so I appreciate you taking the time to write with some humility and perspective.
But Drummond, I believe you're missing the whole point of letting me or anybody else discuss, share, and talk about thoughts, and it appears you're advocating limitations on concepts and ideas.

That's not really on because everyone can have intuitive experiences, and if I find anything related to Villa to talk about, then that's what I will talk about. Let's all write respectfully, but according to our individual preferences. Thank you. I believe that at this point, notwithstanding individual differences in opinion, everyone will be in agreement.

You're free to post what you like, but then by the same token everybody's free to call you out on it if they think it's nonsense.

People can and do disagree about whether they think Diaby will improve next season for example, or if Cash needs replacing or whatever. Absolutely nobody at all is going to take a post seriously saying that Rogers is taking the piss in training because he picked up a hamstring injury, or that Gauci is likely to play because you had a dream about three magpies, or other nonsense like that. If you're going to post stuff like that, well you can expect to get picked up on it, and because you post it so regularly, people are pissed off with it and aren't always going to be that polite when responding. Up to you really.

1. This is not the Ginger thread ! Which has descended into disgustingly explicit and filthy content that moderators need to address!
2. Appreciate your view and words however there's a big difference to picked on and picked up on! I think validating how I'm feeling and respecting me as an individual is all I ask.
3. I think these 3 points are understood and we all want 3 points on Monday.
Thank You let's move on and focus on the relevancy of discussing all things Gaucci.

Please respect our rights to post humour (explicit or otherwise) without picking on us. Thanks.

[Drummond]

Humour?

[Percy McCarthy]

Humour?

The stuff from Viz that he thinks should be banned.

[Drummond]

I know, I was trying some dry stuff of my own.

[Percy McCarthy]

I know, I was trying some dry stuff of my own.

Haha, sorry, I thought you’d gone all ‘moral’.

[Drummond]

I know, I was trying some dry stuff of my own.

Haha, sorry, I thought you’d gone all ‘moral’.

Nah, fuck that.

[Bad English]

"Ginger thread." They are taking the piss and lapping up the attention.