Has there not? I’m sure I’ve seen VAR calls in our favour - not least that it helps us play the defensive style we do.
Yeah I get that, but the fact VAR is there does help us. I’d good the on field decision making has been correct, but the fact VAR is there gives us a safety net so it is useful for us.
Quote from: Brend'Watkins on January 15, 2024, 12:31:12 PMQuote from: jon collett on January 15, 2024, 11:42:21 AMEverybody seems certain it was Bailey who was offside but why did they start analysing Lenglet blocking the keeper's view? It was at that stage i thought bailey had been passed onside. I cant understand why they would do this unless to do the two issues at the same time to save time?Either way the reason the offside law exists is to act as a deterrent to goal hanging. It was never intended to micro analyse. Unless the decision is blatantly wrong the onfield decision ought to be upheld.Me too. I was thinking, "why are they showing the tugging by Lengelet on Coleman?" he wasn't interfering with the play in any shape or form. If the reason was Bailey, that should have been sorted in 10 seconds max.Gallagher was claiming they couldn't see Bailey's position when the pass was made, not sure if that was the case initially or later. In any case Lenglet fouls the guy and Bailey is also offside. Cracking finish but the correct decision.
Quote from: jon collett on January 15, 2024, 11:42:21 AMEverybody seems certain it was Bailey who was offside but why did they start analysing Lenglet blocking the keeper's view? It was at that stage i thought bailey had been passed onside. I cant understand why they would do this unless to do the two issues at the same time to save time?Either way the reason the offside law exists is to act as a deterrent to goal hanging. It was never intended to micro analyse. Unless the decision is blatantly wrong the onfield decision ought to be upheld.Me too. I was thinking, "why are they showing the tugging by Lengelet on Coleman?" he wasn't interfering with the play in any shape or form. If the reason was Bailey, that should have been sorted in 10 seconds max.
Everybody seems certain it was Bailey who was offside but why did they start analysing Lenglet blocking the keeper's view? It was at that stage i thought bailey had been passed onside. I cant understand why they would do this unless to do the two issues at the same time to save time?Either way the reason the offside law exists is to act as a deterrent to goal hanging. It was never intended to micro analyse. Unless the decision is blatantly wrong the onfield decision ought to be upheld.
Quote from: Brend'Watkins on January 15, 2024, 10:48:40 AMCarlos is a weak link in our team. He's not terrible overall but some of his positioning for a central defender is truly awful. He's a back up at most.I agree, I think Lenglet is better.
Carlos is a weak link in our team. He's not terrible overall but some of his positioning for a central defender is truly awful. He's a back up at most.
Quote from: LeeB on January 15, 2024, 10:50:24 AMQuote from: Brend'Watkins on January 15, 2024, 10:48:40 AMCarlos is a weak link in our team. He's not terrible overall but some of his positioning for a central defender is truly awful. He's a back up at most.I agree, I think Lenglet is better.Carlos will cost us at some point, just like Duran. They are both red cards waiting to happen.
Get Konsa back to CB and Cash to RB
I think this is a bit harsh on Carlos, I think the Achilles Injury has cost him quite a bit of pace so he looks a bit cumbersome but other than getting caught in no man’s land for the Calvert chance and stupidly getting booked he didn’t do much wrong.
As for yesterday, Tarkowski should absolutely have been sent off,and could have been more than once. The referee was weak and played to the crowd reaction. If that had been at Villa Park Tarkowski would have seen red for sure.