I must say I kind of turned after Bournemouth. Can't say I totally gave up, but it was so astonishingly poor that I just could not honestly see how it could get better, what there was to build on. And I'd managed to convince myself to be hopeful before that too! Just goes to show, sometimes your first impression is the right one.
I know people say Beale was the brains but weren't we a bit shit in his last few months as well?
I don't really get the concept of paying someone millions to be a figurehead masquerading as a leader. Obviously that's the structure at the BBC, but why would Villa feel a need to do that?
Quote from: edgysatsuma89 on May 31, 2023, 03:17:23 PMI know people say Beale was the brains but weren't we a bit shit in his last few months as well?Yes. Which is why the ‘it’s only one game’ merchants annoyed me a bit after Bournemouth.He kept going on about breaks in the fixtures that he could use to get his ideas across, but every time there was any kind of break, we came back worse. God only knows how bad we’d have been after the World Cup.
Gerrard was useless and no better under Beale. Like others have said that business with Mings was what really got me, no need for it. Mings has never been anything other than a model pro on and off the pitch. Then when the performances didn’t materialise he had to go.
I’d be amazed if Gerrard ever got a top flight job in this country again. Or Lampard for that matter, both utterly inept.
The failures of Gerrard and Lampard highlight the fact that the old cliché about great players being poor managers has never been truer. Of all the decent prem managers currently, only Guardiola was a top notch footballer, I think.