collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Steven Gerrard - yes or no  (Read 60416 times)

Offline Lastfootstamper

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11634
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Greater Birmingham
  • GM : PCM
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #375 on: November 10, 2021, 05:54:07 PM »
I still think we're better with a goalkeeper.

Online walsall villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 1977
  • Location: Probably birdwatching
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #376 on: November 10, 2021, 05:54:50 PM »
So it looks like liverpool's next manager will be appointed to the hotseat at VP. Things were looking good and optimistic there for a while regarding the Villa, but now we're back amongst the also-rans and the teams making up the numbers avoiding the sinkhole of relegation for the foreseeable future. Appointing gerrard is a lazy appointment. It's a vanity appointment by purslow who is increasingly looking like he's not up to the job of ceo. It's an appointment made in liverpool for the future benefit of liverpool. It's a stepping stone appointment. He doesn't get AVFC and he won't get the fans. SG's claret and blue army, it is not. The sh-te pundits or press will be all over gerrarrrrrrd like a rash. If things are going well it will be SG’s Aston Villa (you’re having a laugh!). When things are not going well it will be Aston Villa only, so as to not tarnish gerrarrrrrd’s reputation. His appointment is based on nothing!
Yes liverpool's next manager has a playing profile, but he has no creditable managerial profile and that's what matters. Spuds sack their manager and go out and get Conte. We sack ours and install someone who hasn't earned a single point in the English leagues as manager and very little in the spl (1 title in 3 seasons in the mighty spl?) Aston Villa is better than that to chance the club to someone who is only finding his feet in management.
Outside the scab 6, Leicester knew to get success they needed to appoint proper managers (Ranieri and Rodgers) and in so doing managed title and cup successes. In appointing gerrard we are miles away from the likes of Leicester, West Ham, Newcastle (when/if they get their act together) and possibly Everton and that's without mentioning the scab 6.
Top 10 will only be a dream with the threat of relegation and a fractured club more likely. I'm Villa through and through and will always support the 11 players out on the pitch. Ideally I like to support the dugout as well, but this appointment makes that very difficult.
So that’s a No then?

Online danno

  • Member
  • Posts: 3355
  • Location: Super Tamworth
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #377 on: November 10, 2021, 05:55:10 PM »
I know Gerrard wants the Liverpool job, I know anybody who doesn't hate Liverpool wants Gerrard to get the Liverpool job, I know the media want Gerrard to get the Liverpool job.

What I don't understand is why would Liverpool, and in particular FSG (previously burned by appointing populist choice Kenny Dalglish after Roy Hodgson) choose to replace Klopp with somebody who in all likelihood will have won less than Brendon Rogers?!

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58576
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #378 on: November 10, 2021, 05:55:42 PM »
4/4/3
Players played in position

That’s all I ask.

Love 4-4-3. 12 players. Unless you have Emi in that back 4. In which case that's shit

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10083
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #379 on: November 10, 2021, 05:59:23 PM »
So it looks like liverpool's next manager will be appointed to the hotseat at VP. Things were looking good and optimistic there for a while regarding the Villa, but now we're back amongst the also-rans and the teams making up the numbers avoiding the sinkhole of relegation for the foreseeable future. Appointing gerrard is a lazy appointment. It's a vanity appointment by purslow who is increasingly looking like he's not up to the job of ceo. It's an appointment made in liverpool for the future benefit of liverpool. It's a stepping stone appointment. He doesn't get AVFC and he won't get the fans. SG's claret and blue army, it is not. The sh-te pundits or press will be all over gerrarrrrrrd like a rash. If things are going well it will be SG’s Aston Villa (you’re having a laugh!). When things are not going well it will be Aston Villa only, so as to not tarnish gerrarrrrrd’s reputation. His appointment is based on nothing!
Yes liverpool's next manager has a playing profile, but he has no creditable managerial profile and that's what matters. Spuds sack their manager and go out and get Conte. We sack ours and install someone who hasn't earned a single point in the English leagues as manager and very little in the spl (1 title in 3 seasons in the mighty spl?) Aston Villa is better than that to chance the club to someone who is only finding his feet in management.
Outside the scab 6, Leicester knew to get success they needed to appoint proper managers (Ranieri and Rodgers) and in so doing managed title and cup successes. In appointing gerrard we are miles away from the likes of Leicester, West Ham, Newcastle (when/if they get their act together) and possibly Everton and that's without mentioning the scab 6.
Top 10 will only be a dream with the threat of relegation and a fractured club more likely. I'm Villa through and through and will always support the 11 players out on the pitch. Ideally I like to support the dugout as well, but this appointment makes that very difficult.
What a load of melodramatic nonsence.

We're hiring a manager who is doing well at his current club.  He plays a shape that suits us and has a well regarded backroom team.  If he does very well there's a chance he will move on in maybe 3 years.  If he's done well enough to get the Liverpool job, who gives a fuck if he's leaving us in a better place?

How many managers have we had who've lasted more than 3 years anyway?  How many managers in the PL have been in their role more than 3 years?

It's not my favoured appointment but this sort of hysterical bullshit is ridiculous.  Get a fucking grip.

Online walsall villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 1977
  • Location: Probably birdwatching
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #380 on: November 10, 2021, 06:01:49 PM »
I know Gerrard wants the Liverpool job, I know anybody who doesn't hate Liverpool wants Gerrard to get the Liverpool job, I know the media want Gerrard to get the Liverpool job.

What I don't understand is why would Liverpool, and in particular FSG (previously burned by appointing populist choice Kenny Dalglish after Roy Hodgson) choose to replace Klopp with somebody who in all likelihood will have won less than Brendon Rogers?!
Gerrard would have to exceed my expectations at Villa to have a chance of managing Liverpool. It’s at least a couple of years away so I’m not stressing. My gut feeling is that it won’t work out at Villa but I’ll be 100% behind him and hoping to be surprised by roaring success.

Offline Small Rodent

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11210
  • Location: Streatham
  • GM : 30.01.2026
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #381 on: November 10, 2021, 06:02:32 PM »
4/4/3
Players played in position

That’s all I ask.

Love 4-4-3. 12 players. Unless you have Emi in that back 4. In which case that's shit

Sorry that should be 3/4/3…not.

Offline Whiney MacWhineface

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12323
  • Location: East Sussex
  • GM : 25.01.2026
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #382 on: November 10, 2021, 06:02:42 PM »
There’s something about his hair that annoys me.

That’s all I contribute.

Offline Dazvillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 4241
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Ex Midlander now in S. Wales
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #383 on: November 10, 2021, 06:08:20 PM »
It seems increasingly likely that he will get appointed, I would have preferred Martinez ….. I then read his poor statistics from his premier league time so maybe he’s not best either. Surely if it’s just ego based decision by Purslow, our very switched on owners wouldn’t fall for that ?
So if it is to be SG….. be good that Gary Mac comes back and he will “get” the club.
Do we think that his other assistant Michael Beale will come who he’s known since Liverpool days ? We’ve only just employed Aaron Danks and McPhee

Offline itmustbe_it is!

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1075
  • GM : 06.01.2026
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #384 on: November 10, 2021, 06:08:59 PM »
Dean Smith : "They sacked  me for Steven F***ing Gerrard??? "

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47982
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #385 on: November 10, 2021, 06:13:04 PM »
There’s something about his hair that annoys me.

That’s all I contribute.

He has a good thick head of hair despite being in his 40s which may explain some posters' ire on here. ;)

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22945
  • Location: Salop
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #386 on: November 10, 2021, 06:14:14 PM »
This is absolutely not a dig at anyone, merely an observation about the H&V ecosystem, which concerns Villa matters only rather than politics etc. It always seems to be the same group of posters who take position X and another take position Y. The same people, with opposing views, on practically every issue. How the eff does that happen?!

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35557
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #387 on: November 10, 2021, 06:16:51 PM »
This is absolutely not a dig at anyone, merely an observation about the H&V ecosystem, which concerns Villa matters only rather than politics etc. It always seems to be the same group of posters who take position X and another take position Y. The same people, with opposing views, on practically every issue. How the eff does that happen?!

The ones on the other side are all thick

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22945
  • Location: Salop
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #388 on: November 10, 2021, 06:17:28 PM »
This is absolutely not a dig at anyone, merely an observation about the H&V ecosystem, which concerns Villa matters only rather than politics etc. It always seems to be the same group of posters who take position X and another take position Y. The same people, with opposing views, on practically every issue. How the eff does that happen?!

The ones on the other side are all thick

That's what I was hoping.

Online john e

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20562
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: Steven Gerrard - yes or no
« Reply #389 on: November 10, 2021, 06:22:20 PM »
This is absolutely not a dig at anyone, merely an observation about the H&V ecosystem, which concerns Villa matters only rather than politics etc. It always seems to be the same group of posters who take position X and another take position Y. The same people, with opposing views, on practically every issue. How the eff does that happen?!

I think it all boils down to where are you stood in the old Holte End left or right

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal