collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pre season 2025 by Rigadon
[Today at 08:01:26 PM]


George Hemmings by paul_e
[Today at 07:52:35 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 07:41:48 PM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by Demitri_C
[Today at 07:06:46 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Demitri_C
[Today at 07:05:34 PM]


Leander Dendoncker by paul_e
[Today at 06:08:42 PM]


Where will Villa finish 2025/26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 05:59:05 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Pre season 2025 by Rigadon
[Today at 08:01:26 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by JUAN PABLO
[Today at 08:01:21 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Tayls_7
[Today at 08:01:15 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:00:24 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by dorsetvillian
[Today at 07:59:37 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by JUAN PABLO
[Today at 07:58:50 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 07:58:20 PM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by paul_e
[Today at 07:58:00 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 499854 times)

Online Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 8127
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: FFP
« Reply #3870 on: February 02, 2025, 01:49:23 PM »
Did anyone see the wages ratio to Revenue  on sky? We were bottom at 99% compared to spurs at 43%

Our wage bill looks out of control . Wtf is going on?
96%
So assuming we are going to be massively ok with duran sale?
We know we're okay at present because the Premier League have said so. But we need to sort out this 96-98% of our revenue being spent on wages.

We already have. That was based on turnover of £204m. we're going to come close to doubling that this season without having increased our wage bill all that much.
2024 accounts show revenues of 310 million euros ( £260 million ) of which 96% of that is spent on wages. We don't yet know what 2025 accounts will show, probably an increase in revenue yes but who knows what our outgoings will be on who we bring in, salaries and

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12137
Re: FFP
« Reply #3871 on: February 02, 2025, 02:35:34 PM »
Did anyone see the wages ratio to Revenue  on sky? We were bottom at 99% compared to spurs at 43%

Our wage bill looks out of control . Wtf is going on?
96%

Sky had it 99%

Online jwarry

  • Member
  • Posts: 6717
  • Location: Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus
Re: FFP
« Reply #3872 on: February 02, 2025, 02:39:52 PM »
Feels like we are gambling, but you can see who Heck has been given free rein to do whatever it takes

Online Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 8127
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: FFP
« Reply #3873 on: February 02, 2025, 02:44:19 PM »
Did anyone see the wages ratio to Revenue  on sky? We were bottom at 99% compared to spurs at 43%

Our wage bill looks out of control . Wtf is going on?
96%

Sky had it 99%

No they didn't and you're wrong about both clubs.




Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11726
Re: FFP
« Reply #3874 on: February 02, 2025, 02:49:31 PM »
Basically the wage to turnover ratio makes it even harder than PSR for us to repeatedly break the top 4.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35608
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #3875 on: February 02, 2025, 02:54:57 PM »
Did anyone see the wages ratio to Revenue  on sky? We were bottom at 99% compared to spurs at 43%

Our wage bill looks out of control . Wtf is going on?

96%.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15650
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #3876 on: February 02, 2025, 03:00:40 PM »
Isn’t that last year’s numbers?

Online Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 8127
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: FFP
« Reply #3877 on: February 02, 2025, 03:02:17 PM »
Isn’t that last year’s numbers?
They can't be this years yet.

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12137
Re: FFP
« Reply #3878 on: February 02, 2025, 03:08:58 PM »
Did anyone see the wages ratio to Revenue  on sky? We were bottom at 99% compared to spurs at 43%

Our wage bill looks out of control . Wtf is going on?
96%

Sky had it 99%

No they didn't and you're wrong about both clubs.



My eye sites getting worse clearly 😂

But regardless 96% is still fucking high like my original point stated

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35608
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #3879 on: February 02, 2025, 03:52:40 PM »

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33716
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: FFP
« Reply #3880 on: February 02, 2025, 03:57:14 PM »
Surprised Noocassil's isn't higher.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35608
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #3881 on: February 02, 2025, 04:11:52 PM »
Did anyone see the wages ratio to Revenue  on sky? We were bottom at 99% compared to spurs at 43%

Our wage bill looks out of control . Wtf is going on?
96%

Sky had it 99%

No they didn't and you're wrong about both clubs.



My eye sites getting worse clearly 😂

But regardless 96% is still fucking high like my original point stated

Player sales of £150m plus since July 1st, big increases in sponsorship and CL revenue of £75m and counting will lower that percentage somewhat.

Online Demitri_C

  • Member
  • Posts: 12137
Re: FFP
« Reply #3882 on: February 02, 2025, 04:13:24 PM »
Cheers pervy. Be good to see what it will be this year. You would assume selling some players would have helped with that

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72510
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #3883 on: February 02, 2025, 04:14:37 PM »
Cheers pervy.

I didn't know it was that sort of forum.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22835
  • Location: Salop
Re: FFP
« Reply #3884 on: February 02, 2025, 04:16:08 PM »
Cheers pervy.

I didn't know it was that sort of forum.

It very much is, seedybearsfan.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal