collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Ollie Watkins by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:45:36 AM]


Pre season 2025 by PeterWithe
[Today at 10:37:27 AM]


Paul Brunton by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:20:21 AM]


Leander Dendoncker by Drummond
[Today at 10:17:52 AM]


Standard of Refereeing by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:16:52 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 10:10:51 AM]


Kits 25/26 by PhilVill
[Today at 09:47:28 AM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:34:03 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Ollie Watkins by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:45:36 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by PeterWithe
[Today at 10:37:27 AM]


Re: Paul Brunton by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:20:21 AM]


Re: Leander Dendoncker by Drummond
[Today at 10:17:52 AM]


Re: Standard of Refereeing by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:16:52 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by martin o`who??
[Today at 10:14:53 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 10:10:51 AM]


Re: Pre season 2025 by Bosco81
[Today at 10:10:30 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 497324 times)

Offline Lsvilla

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2005
  • GM : 12.08.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #2670 on: June 05, 2024, 10:35:23 AM »
This is really simple for the Premier League, if the majority are against what they are doing then they should threaten them with expulsion for not abiding by the rules - and no lingering about, set a deadline of 4 weeks before the beginning of next season to back down

This.
Yep. This is the time for the clubs to step up for the preservation of competition. And if they threaten another ESL then call their bluff. It's unlikely the other protagonists fans would support any other English club joining them so they'd be properly out on a limb. Fuck 'em.

Offline Dogtanian

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7584
  • Location: The Streets of Rage ( Tamworth )
  • GM : 06.06.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #2671 on: June 05, 2024, 10:41:34 AM »
I think Man City fucking off would be quite popular amongst the other clubs.

The idea of their scum owners setting up their own super league and offering billions in prize money to lure away the greedy bastards is a danger.

But they'd have to weigh that up against the problems of signing up to a league run by one of the teams and whose existence is solely down to that team not wanting to listen to other teams.

Online Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32860
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #2672 on: June 05, 2024, 12:38:08 PM »
I think Man City fucking off would be quite popular amongst the other clubs.

The idea of their scum owners setting up their own super league and offering billions in prize money to lure away the greedy bastards is a danger.

But they'd have to weigh that up against the problems of signing up to a league run by one of the teams and whose existence is solely down to that team not wanting to listen to other teams.

Ah, the ESL again. Them, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus. They could just play each other once a month.

Offline pablo_picasso

  • Member
  • Posts: 3776
  • GM : 17.11.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #2673 on: June 05, 2024, 12:45:24 PM »
One thing that is quite noticeable about this legal action, as it has been during the 115 charges, is that the media are fucking silent over the whole thing.

And during a time where there is no football on too.

They spent hours talking about Chelseas new manager search & that little gimp with his three phones trying to convince everybody that Maresca is elite level.

But the 115 charges & legal action?

Fucking tumbleweed...

Offline Olneythelonely

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8741
  • Location: Selly Park
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: FFP
« Reply #2674 on: June 05, 2024, 12:49:26 PM »
One thing that is quite noticeable about this legal action, as it has been during the 115 charges, is that the media are fucking silent over the whole thing.

And during a time where there is no football on too.

They spent hours talking about Chelseas new manager search & that little gimp with his three phones trying to convince everybody that Maresca is elite level.

But the 115 charges & legal action?

Fucking tumbleweed...

Tbf, I’ve seen it on every news outlet I’ve been on.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 42830
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #2675 on: June 05, 2024, 12:50:25 PM »
It has been discussed plenty in the media. There's a hearing in November, nothing has changed for a considerable period of time.

Offline pablo_picasso

  • Member
  • Posts: 3776
  • GM : 17.11.2024
Re: FFP
« Reply #2676 on: June 05, 2024, 12:52:10 PM »
I saw a ticker slide by yesterday on Sky Sports News & nothing since.

Normally they are talking to death the details that are tenuously linked to a story...

Offline KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 14104
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: FFP
« Reply #2677 on: June 05, 2024, 12:58:10 PM »
I think Man City fucking off would be quite popular amongst the other clubs.

The idea of their scum owners setting up their own super league and offering billions in prize money to lure away the greedy bastards is a danger.

But they'd have to weigh that up against the problems of signing up to a league run by one of the teams and whose existence is solely down to that team not wanting to listen to other teams.

Ah, the ESL again. Them, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus. They could just play each other once a month.

In perpetuity, with no chance of parole.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26215
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: FFP
« Reply #2678 on: June 05, 2024, 02:58:22 PM »
When you look at the basis of their claim and then consider normal business practice and common sense, you then see the great lengths they have had to go to in order to contrive this action.
This looks like. a nuisance case. Where an aggressive usually self funded nut job keeps lobbing spurious claims against an institution in the hope that something will stick. On this occasion it is a lawyered up very rich claimant.
If the PL holds its nerve and is prepared to fight this, it will get dismissed but it does create a level of leverage in respect of the outcome of the 115 charges.
This will have created a chasm between Citeh, its allies and the rest of the PL teams.

« Last Edit: June 05, 2024, 02:59:53 PM by ChicagoLion »

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15416
Re: FFP
« Reply #2679 on: June 05, 2024, 05:30:28 PM »
One thing that is quite noticeable about this legal action, as it has been during the 115 charges, is that the media are fucking silent over the whole thing.

And during a time where there is no football on too.

They spent hours talking about Chelseas new manager search & that little gimp with his three phones trying to convince everybody that Maresca is elite level.

But the 115 charges & legal action?

Fucking tumbleweed...

Given their owners, this isn't just a football issue.  It's a political hot potato as well and I'm sure there are a number of people in a few corridors of power who don't want their owners to be upset in any way.

Offline DB

  • Member
  • Posts: 5540
  • Location: Absolute zero
  • GM : 11.01.2021
Re: FFP
« Reply #2680 on: June 05, 2024, 05:33:15 PM »
If City are found guilty on some or all these 115 charges, this would seriously impact the PL brand. Could be a lot of commercial knock on effects if the ‘best league in the world’ was basically won by cheating the last 10 years or so.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54891
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #2681 on: June 05, 2024, 05:35:03 PM »
Well it hasn’t moved, and given how litigious Citeh are I imagine they need to be very careful. The 115 charges are regularly referenced in stuff I see.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72459
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #2682 on: June 05, 2024, 05:44:27 PM »
They obviously wouldn't be making this much fuss if they were guilty. Surely we can just trust them at their word? They seem a pretty principled bunch to me.

Offline SaddVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2287
  • Location: Saddleworth
  • 1000 ft up in the hills gazing down on Manchester
Re: FFP
« Reply #2683 on: June 05, 2024, 06:03:26 PM »
The Prem is effectively a members club.

The membership rules are straightforward and set by a majority of 14 out of 20 clubs (the FA holds a "golden vote" which it has never excercised).

As a member, you abide by the rules.

If you don't like them, you try and persuade the other members to back any changes you wish to suggest.

If you lose and still don't like the rules, you can fuck off.

Online Stu

  • Member
  • Posts: 14004
  • GM : 09.04.2021
Re: FFP
« Reply #2684 on: June 05, 2024, 06:16:47 PM »
They obviously wouldn't be making this much fuss if they were guilty. Surely we can just trust them at their word? They seem a pretty principled bunch to me.

Hello!

I was thinking this earlier actually, after reflecting on my previous post. Why press the nuclear button now and demand they can get as much money as they want through sponsorship deals when they're accused of over-inflating sponsorship deals in order to by-pass FFP/PSR, which they are adamant they are innocent of? Bad news? Heard they're likely to be done big time?

The quote in their complaint - "Tyranny of the majority" - after winning the prem for the 4th time in a row no less, is specifically anti-democratic and fully inline with the values of the gangsters who own that club.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal