Quote from: Ads on February 28, 2024, 11:30:59 AMHanding Bailey a big new contract. Signing Captian Rogers and the Serbian Cafu are also two other unusual steps to take if you've apparently lost €138m.The young players are just guys we can just move on if they don't work out. Rogers scores 4-5 goals in a season but dosen't step up to the level needed, can just sell him to a newly promoted club in two years for more than we paid.It makes more sense then getting in a Digne or Coutinho who are nearly impossible to shift permanently with the wages they're on.
Handing Bailey a big new contract. Signing Captian Rogers and the Serbian Cafu are also two other unusual steps to take if you've apparently lost €138m.
If we need to sell, then the most likely will be Ramsey who would fetch in £40m plus, and would be pure FFP profit.
Quote from: ASHTONVILLA on February 28, 2024, 12:07:36 PMIf we need to sell, then the most likely will be Ramsey who would fetch in £40m plus, and would be pure FFP profit.Can someone explain to me why the likes of Luiz, Konsa, Kamara, Mings & McGinn wouldn't be pure FFP profit? Probably Watkins too by this summer. Surely their initial fees have already all been amortised so there's nothing in the books for them?
We all use the mantra of "In Unai we trust"Why do we not have the same faith in the likes of Wes / Nas / Monchi etc to know what they are doing also. I am sure the former have not amassed their wealth by oversights like failing compliance.I prefer to let them guys look after the finances of our club as i dont understand / know enough to be able to comment with any significance as i am sure some of the journo's who get involved also. Our accounts are published periodically - other than that no one will know what the details are.
I cannot believe the owners would allow such obvious overspending. It just doesn’t make sense.
If we have to sell a key player to the cheating fucker teams to strengthen them and weaken us because of some bollocks FFP rules, I'll be absolutely fuming.Man City could just buy one of our players for a laugh, then stick them on the bench for a couple of seasons.
I think most people would have seen it as a £17m gamble - which for a player that was sold a couple of years previously for +£100m was worthwhile.As soon as his mate was sacked, then his days were numbered. Pity we can't at least get some of that £17m back...
Quote from: London Villan on February 28, 2024, 10:59:05 AMI think most people would have seen it as a £17m gamble - which for a player that was sold a couple of years previously for +£100m was worthwhile.As soon as his mate was sacked, then his days were numbered. Pity we can't at least get some of that £17m back...Yep, this. We paid £17m for a player who might've returned to being a £100m+ player. It didn't work out. There'll be other similar buys that do work out (e.g. Tyrone Mings was arguably a similar signing - loan then purchase of an out-of-favour player). These things happen - it was worth a punt.