collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pre season 2025 by TCFKAE2
[Today at 11:26:18 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 11:16:35 AM]


Tour de France 2025 by UK Redsox
[Today at 11:04:59 AM]


International Rugby by UK Redsox
[Today at 10:59:51 AM]


Kits 25/26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 10:54:41 AM]


Louie Barry (on loan to Sheffield United) by dcdavecollett
[Today at 02:33:02 AM]


Games Moved for TV by Martyn Smith
[Today at 02:05:21 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 481318 times)

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 22777
  • Location: Salop
Re: FFP
« Reply #4170 on: March 31, 2025, 10:40:38 PM »
And me.

Offline Mellin

  • Member
  • Posts: 2436
  • Age: 38
  • Location: Leicestershire
Re: FFP
« Reply #4171 on: March 31, 2025, 10:45:53 PM »
When Drummond or someone cracks and takes out FV it'll be this century's Franz Ferdinand.

Offline jon collett

  • Member
  • Posts: 1044
Re: FFP
« Reply #4172 on: March 31, 2025, 10:51:25 PM »
When Drummond or someone cracks and takes out FV it'll be this century's Franz Ferdinand.

Take me out

Offline Tokyo Sexwhale

  • Member
  • Posts: 3424
Re: FFP
« Reply #4173 on: March 31, 2025, 10:59:09 PM »
If we've complied with FFP, I wonder what sort of wiggle room we've got with regards to strengthening come the summer.

I'd imagine sell to buy like last summer again. Bailey, Watkins, Ramsey, Cash, McGinn, Kamara, Konsa and Tielemans all have a lot of FFP value don't they?

Maybe Bailey, Cash and McGinn would be the ones to sell who would affect the first team strength the least?

Our figures for this season should be even better given our CL money and the sale of Duran; so hopefully it means we don't have to sell anyone that we want to keep; and add 2 or 3 more.

I wouldn't mind if we sold Cash and Bailey; but we shouldn't be selling McGinn.

Offline purpletrousers

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2127
  • Location: Luton / East London
  • GM : 25.04.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #4174 on: March 31, 2025, 11:25:54 PM »
If we've complied with FFP, I wonder what sort of wiggle room we've got with regards to strengthening come the summer.

I'd imagine sell to buy like last summer again. Bailey, Watkins, Ramsey, Cash, McGinn, Kamara, Konsa and Tielemans all have a lot of FFP value don't they?

Maybe Bailey, Cash and McGinn would be the ones to sell who would affect the first team strength the least?

Our figures for this season should be even better given our CL money and the sale of Duran; so hopefully it means we don't have to sell anyone that we want to keep; and add 2 or 3 more.

I wouldn't mind if we sold Cash and Bailey; but we shouldn't be selling McGinn.

Agreed. Practical and sentimental reasons…

When Drummond or someone cracks and takes out FV it'll be this century's Franz Ferdinand.

Take me out

Where do you fancy going?

Online jwarry

  • Member
  • Posts: 6708
  • Location: Kyrenia, Northern Cyprus
Re: FFP
« Reply #4175 on: April 01, 2025, 04:15:19 AM »
Meanwhile Chelsea record a profit because they sold their women’s team to themselves which is within the rules apparently 🤷🏼‍♂️

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 35557
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #4176 on: April 01, 2025, 06:26:24 AM »
Meanwhile Chelsea record a profit because they sold their women’s team to themselves which is within the rules apparently 🤷🏼‍♂️

Well, we need to get on it then. I think we’d have to buy it first as I believe we don’t own it at the moment.

Offline lovejoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 9508
  • Location: Haywards Heath
Re: FFP
« Reply #4177 on: April 01, 2025, 07:37:37 AM »
Meanwhile Chelsea record a profit because they sold their women’s team to themselves which is within the rules apparently 🤷🏼‍♂️

Well, we need to get on it then. I think we’d have to buy it first as I believe we don’t own it at the moment.

Therein lies the issue. I assumed this was April Fools joke.

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36407
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #4178 on: April 01, 2025, 08:08:14 AM »
I remain pro-FV.

I’ve stopped reading his posts.

Offline sid1964

  • Member
  • Posts: 3542
  • Location: Dudley, not far from the Castle
Re: FFP
« Reply #4179 on: April 01, 2025, 08:24:13 AM »
if we qualify for either the champions league or another European competition how will we comply with the new European rules next season?

Our owners must have very deep pockets to continue to fund our club every season.

Online Olneythelonely

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8678
  • Location: Selly Park
  • GM : 13.06.26
Re: FFP
« Reply #4180 on: April 01, 2025, 08:26:24 AM »
They have incredibly deep pockets, but you’d think there’ll be a limit.

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11702
Re: FFP
« Reply #4181 on: April 01, 2025, 08:31:20 AM »
Meanwhile Chelsea record a profit because they sold their women’s team to themselves which is within the rules apparently 🤷🏼‍♂️

They sold their own hotels to themselves last season for £80m and the Womens team this season for almost £200m. It's a total farce what they allow Man City and Chelsea to get away with.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35482
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: FFP
« Reply #4182 on: April 01, 2025, 08:33:17 AM »
if we qualify for either the champions league or another European competition how will we comply with the new European rules next season?

Our owners must have very deep pockets to continue to fund our club every season.
They have incredibly deep pockets, but you’d think there’ll be a limit.

Whatever they've put in, I'm pretty sure it's covered by the value of the club now compared to what they paid for it.


Online Dave

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47468
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 16.09.2025
Re: FFP
« Reply #4183 on: April 01, 2025, 08:40:15 AM »
Meanwhile Chelsea record a profit because they sold their women’s team to themselves which is within the rules apparently 🤷🏼‍♂️

They sold their own hotels to themselves last season for £80m and the Womens team this season for almost £200m. It's a total farce what they allow Man City and Chelsea to get away with.

Was it a total farce when they allowed us to get away with selling our own ground to ourselves?

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11702
Re: FFP
« Reply #4184 on: April 01, 2025, 08:43:15 AM »
Meanwhile Chelsea record a profit because they sold their women’s team to themselves which is within the rules apparently 🤷🏼‍♂️

They sold their own hotels to themselves last season for £80m and the Womens team this season for almost £200m. It's a total farce what they allow Man City and Chelsea to get away with.

Was it a total farce when they allowed us to get away with selling our own ground to ourselves?

That wasn't the Premier League.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal