Why do some opinions have to be hyperbolic?Maybe it’s only the better fans who don’t say anything negative.
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on June 17, 2020, 08:12:06 PMQuote from: paul_e on June 17, 2020, 08:08:25 PMHe was one of the best players on the pitch, he needs a goal but he's a long way down the list of people to be criticised.Yes they should've scored but we had a couple of good shouts for penalties and got 6 shots on target to their 1. On top of that there were 7-8 times where they relied on their scramble defence which they do well. Don't forget that's the 2nd best defence in the league and that's built on them making it very hard for teams to get shots away and a very solid keeper behind them.That isn't saying a great deal though is it paul, to be fair. He didn't do any more or less than he normally does which is put himself about, hold the ball up extremely well and not look like scoring. He should have buried that close range header. That's why I say I don't know what Dean saw in training. If we're only playing one striker it can't be him.It's saying that singling him out after that performance as the only player to criticise is completely unfair. He did exactly the job he was picked to do and bullied their back 3 on his own but we didn't make the most of that. It's not his fault AEG wasn't getting closer to him or that Samatta didn't start next to him and it's not his fault that they have a defence that is very good at stifling things out around the box.
Quote from: paul_e on June 17, 2020, 08:08:25 PMHe was one of the best players on the pitch, he needs a goal but he's a long way down the list of people to be criticised.Yes they should've scored but we had a couple of good shouts for penalties and got 6 shots on target to their 1. On top of that there were 7-8 times where they relied on their scramble defence which they do well. Don't forget that's the 2nd best defence in the league and that's built on them making it very hard for teams to get shots away and a very solid keeper behind them.That isn't saying a great deal though is it paul, to be fair. He didn't do any more or less than he normally does which is put himself about, hold the ball up extremely well and not look like scoring. He should have buried that close range header. That's why I say I don't know what Dean saw in training. If we're only playing one striker it can't be him.
He was one of the best players on the pitch, he needs a goal but he's a long way down the list of people to be criticised.Yes they should've scored but we had a couple of good shouts for penalties and got 6 shots on target to their 1. On top of that there were 7-8 times where they relied on their scramble defence which they do well. Don't forget that's the 2nd best defence in the league and that's built on them making it very hard for teams to get shots away and a very solid keeper behind them.