For 2019-20
Also if the offence was going to be a red card for denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity, but the opposition take a quick free-kick, then the player will only be booked because the other team are considered to have restarted their attack.
Mixed bag. Some sensible changes but the new handball rule will cause chaos. There is no way it will be applied consistently. What counts as a penalty when it's a Villa defender will be a world different from what counts as a penalty when it's a Man U defender at Old Trafford.Not keen on the uncontested drop ball being given to the goalkeeper when the attacking team had reached the penalty area. Why not just give it to the attacking team on the edge of the box? Hopefully referees will have the common sense to wait till the ball has gone out of play if someone has reached the area, wherever possible.
The most stupid one for me, and the one I think will need to be re-thought out soonest, is the penalty rule for the goalkeeper having to keep one foot on the line and not be in front of it when the penalty is taken. Not a problem on its own, but when combined with VAR to make absolutely sure it will make it incredibly hard to defend a penalty.If you think about it, when a goalkeeper is watching the player run up they will judge when he is about to strike the ball and move to save it. The brain does this automatically based on the movement of the player's foot in relation to the ball ( same way it automatically calculates how a ball will bounce before it hits the ground ). If the goalkeeper is a split second out and moves and the opposition doesn't score, VAR will kick in and it will be re-taken. If the goalkeeper waits until the ball has definitely been kicked then it will almost certainly be a goal.The combination of the new rule with VAR will make it much harder to defend penalties and will see a significant increase in conversion.
Quote from: Dogtanian on August 05, 2019, 10:45:47 AMThe most stupid one for me, and the one I think will need to be re-thought out soonest, is the penalty rule for the goalkeeper having to keep one foot on the line and not be in front of it when the penalty is taken. Not a problem on its own, but when combined with VAR to make absolutely sure it will make it incredibly hard to defend a penalty.If you think about it, when a goalkeeper is watching the player run up they will judge when he is about to strike the ball and move to save it. The brain does this automatically based on the movement of the player's foot in relation to the ball ( same way it automatically calculates how a ball will bounce before it hits the ground ). If the goalkeeper is a split second out and moves and the opposition doesn't score, VAR will kick in and it will be re-taken. If the goalkeeper waits until the ball has definitely been kicked then it will almost certainly be a goal.The combination of the new rule with VAR will make it much harder to defend penalties and will see a significant increase in conversion. So? It's a penalty, it's meant to be hard to defend! 12 yards out, 1 person to beat, nearly 200ft² of goal to aim for. There's no excuse for missing. Only one in about six doesn't get scored. It's not that long ago that keepers weren't allowed to move at all, they should count their blessings.
I agree. A penalty is awarded for foul play. It should be in favour of the team it's awarded to. It's certainly not supposed to result in a 50/50, 60/40 situation.
But they can move. They can move sideways all they like, and only need the merest of contact with only one foot with the line for it to be legit. What more do they want, charge it down when the ref blows?