collapse collapse

Please donate to help keep this site going.

The Fanzine

Heroes & Villains Fanzine

Get your fix of all things Claret & Blue by subscribing to the online version!

* H&V Best Of

Follow us on...

Author Topic: VAR  (Read 81296 times)

Online dave shelley

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10855
  • Age: 71
  • Location: between a rock and a hard place
  • GM : 01.02.2021
Re: VAR
« Reply #1170 on: December 01, 2019, 07:32:33 PM »
He might not be playing at the top of his game but he’s such a good bloke is Mings. Terrible And very sad thing to have happened to Afobe’s child.

Terrible thing for Afobe and his wife.  Life just 'aint fair sometimes. Damo's daughter's friends child too.  Horrible.  Wrong thread I know.

Offline Luke8

  • Member
  • Posts: 397
Re: VAR
« Reply #1171 on: December 01, 2019, 07:46:32 PM »
Think the ‘I don’t know’ non celebration shrug we have seen from El Ghazi and Mings in the previously two games can be added to the list of reasons that VAR is negatively impacting the game.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57283
  • Location: B16
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: VAR
« Reply #1172 on: December 02, 2019, 11:14:07 PM »
Danny Murphy talks sense about Villa for once https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=474638919832220

Offline Pete3206

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14659
  • Location: Erdington
  • GM : 21.01.2017
Re: VAR
« Reply #1173 on: December 02, 2019, 11:23:11 PM »
Danny Murphy talks sense about Villa for once https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=474638919832220

Spot on from Murphy (can't believe I'm saying that)

Look at the Villa Vlogs from the game and you'll see how right he is.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57283
  • Location: B16
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: VAR
« Reply #1174 on: December 02, 2019, 11:24:16 PM »
He still looks like a gremlin though.

Offline KRS

  • Member
  • Posts: 5793
Re: VAR
« Reply #1175 on: December 03, 2019, 06:11:11 AM »
No one has mentioned our disallowed goal due to Jacks trailing walking leg being a few inches offside. Jack and the last defender are basically level with his trailing leg a fraction of a second behind as they walk towards our goal. The linesman incorrectly flagged for a different reason (according to the live commentary), and this is another example of how offside decisions in the VAR age are being poorly implemented.

Offline frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 2177
Re: VAR
« Reply #1176 on: December 03, 2019, 06:49:38 AM »
No one has mentioned our disallowed goal due to Jacks trailing walking leg being a few inches offside. Jack and the last defender are basically level with his trailing leg a fraction of a second behind as they walk towards our goal. The linesman incorrectly flagged for a different reason (according to the live commentary), and this is another example of how offside decisions in the VAR age are being poorly implemented.

He was offside and the Lino said Grealish (lip reading)

Online Lastfootstamper

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5184
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Greater Birmingham
  • GM : 02.01.2021
Re: VAR
« Reply #1177 on: December 03, 2019, 07:37:50 AM »
Indeed. I can't believe that as Grealish was looking across the line to make sure he was onside, he didn't remember where his trailing foot was. How much a week, and he can't even do that?

Offline maidstonevillain

  • Member
  • Posts: 3651
  • GM : 10.04.2020
Re: VAR
« Reply #1178 on: December 03, 2019, 01:10:19 PM »
No one has mentioned our disallowed goal due to Jacks trailing walking leg being a few inches offside. Jack and the last defender are basically level with his trailing leg a fraction of a second behind as they walk towards our goal. The linesman incorrectly flagged for a different reason (according to the live commentary), and this is another example of how offside decisions in the VAR age are being poorly implemented.
But didn't VAR effectively work in our favour in this instance. If there had been no VAR the ref would, on the linesman flagging, probably have blown for offside. But because of VAR he let play continue and then reviewed. OK it was offside in the end, but VAR, and a good decision by ref., put us within 2" of going 2 - 0 up.

Offline darren woolley

  • Member
  • Posts: 24449
  • Location: London
Re: VAR
« Reply #1179 on: December 03, 2019, 01:36:51 PM »
It's getting ridiculous this VAR get rid of the bloody thing I mean look at Tyrone Mings goal brilliant Volley and Tyrone wanted to dedicate his goal to Benik Afobe for the terrible loss of his daughter and he couldn't which makes me so mad about this VAR.

Offline KRS

  • Member
  • Posts: 5793
Re: VAR
« Reply #1180 on: December 03, 2019, 02:54:47 PM »
No one has mentioned our disallowed goal due to Jacks trailing walking leg being a few inches offside. Jack and the last defender are basically level with his trailing leg a fraction of a second behind as they walk towards our goal. The linesman incorrectly flagged for a different reason (according to the live commentary), and this is another example of how offside decisions in the VAR age are being poorly implemented.
But didn't VAR effectively work in our favour in this instance. If there had been no VAR the ref would, on the linesman flagging, probably have blown for offside. But because of VAR he let play continue and then reviewed. OK it was offside in the end, but VAR, and a good decision by ref., put us within 2" of going 2 - 0 up.
I have no idea tbh. There are several rules that are being applied so inconsistently with contradictory outcomes that it seems they change their minds to justify the decisions made by on field match officials or to protect the VAR official. It’s almost as if they are making it up as they go along.

Offline kieron

  • Member
  • Posts: 2745
  • Age: 44
  • Location: K3
Re: VAR
« Reply #1181 on: January 02, 2020, 05:20:50 PM »
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/premier-league-clubs-anger-over-mike-rileys-handling-of-var-dxzf0v0bs?ni-statuscode=acsaz-307

Quote
Concerned club officials are to talk to Richard Masters, newly confirmed as the Premier League chief executive, about Mike Riley’s handling of VAR which has descended into a global embarrassment for the image-conscious league. Some want Riley dismissed, and a less pedagogical official appointed general manager of the Professional Game Match Officials Limited which oversees VAR at Stockley Park.

“He is actually a bit thick,” said one leading club official of Riley. “Like a bad schoolteacher. He is the root of the Premier League problem.’’

Clubs voted to bring in VAR but their discontent with Riley’s application of technology mounts through every round of games where goals are chalked off through fractional offsides, from heels to armpits. There are doubts in certain quarters over whether the technology, and line-drawing by a technician, can be totally accurate anyway. More profess frustration at delays in an English game that always prided itself on uninterrupted flow, and that attackers should be favoured anyway.

They point out that the Premier League’s attraction around the world, and allure to wealthy broadcasters, is based substantially on breath-taking attacking and spectacular goals, which many consider is being undermined by Riley’s hunt for fractional offsides. As one official confided, Riley is developing a reputation as “The Goal-Killer”, anathema for the Premier League’s desire to be the “Big Show”, the No 1 entertainment.

Wolves, Sheffield United and Norwich City have been particularly hard done with goals ruled out. Norwich fans now sell T-shirts decrying VAR. Molineux and Bramall Lane regularly ring out to “F*** VAR” and “it’s not football any more”. All clubs have a tale of woe or two. The Footballer of the Year, Raheem Sterling of Manchester City, tweets “happy to improve my VAR overruled goals record” when another of his efforts is ruled out. Even Liverpool, widely considered by opposing fans as beneficiaries of VAR, saw a Sadio Mané header against Watford ruled out for a stray armpit.

Aston Villa’s captain, Jack Grealish, had a magnificent header ruled out against Burnley for the trailing heel of Wesley, who was not involved in the move. The decision by PGMOL, especially when they revealed pictures of their drawn lines, triggered much derision. Players don’t know whether to celebrate or not. The atmosphere in grounds turns toxic, with groaning and goading following overturned decisions.

Riley, 55, who was appointed a Fifa official and worked at Euro 2004 during his years as a Premier League referee, has lost touch with what the game is about, about what players, managers, fans and owners want, and is causing excessive problems for his beleaguered men in the middle.

It’s gone from being a joke to doing damage to the credibility of the league. So certain clubs are turning to Masters to call Riley to account, to control the offside-hunters at Stockley Park and, if he won’t, then dismiss him. Along with addressing the rise of racism within grounds, making Riley see sense, or sacking him, will be the first big test of Masters’ reign.

Masters is respected by the clubs following his calm stewarding of the organisation during the troubled search for Richard Scudamore’s successor. Two candidates were appointed but never started, leaving Masters, the managing director, as interim chief executive, a role eventually made permanent last month.

It will be pointed out to Masters, not that he probably needs reminding, that the original intention of technology was helping overturn “clear and obvious” errors and that is being overlooked with almost a mission to seek out the fractional, mainly with offside. Everyone accepts the offside law needs overhauling. Ifab plans a confab. The Liverpool manager, Jürgen Klopp, talks of being encouraged to hear Uefa discussing widening the margin of error on offside, favouring the attacking side, as it should be. Riley has taken the pursuit too far, with more than 20 goals ruled out already. Alternative “without VAR” league tables abound.

The Premier League pointed out that, “A player is in an offside position if: any part of the head, body or feet is in the opponents’ half (excluding the halfway line) and any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent.’’ Its argument is that there is no room for subjectivity on offside and it can’t be subject to “clear and obvious” because it is a factual decision and that is what has been applied in the Premier League this season, and any change to that would have to come from Ifab. There is an acceptance within the organisation that the technology cannot be 100 per cent accurate because of camera frame rates. At the Premier League’s last shareholders’ meeting, Riley “accepted improvement is required”.

Riley has also come under fierce criticism for referees not consulting pitch-side monitors. England’s few elite referees are encouraged to use the monitors when overseeing Uefa matches. “I hope Fifa insist he [Riley] is binned for flagrantly ignoring directive on field-ref use of monitor,” added one club official.

The concerned club officials want to wrest control of games back from Stockley Park, restoring the authority of the actual match official who is at risk of simply becoming a messenger boy for PGMOL. These club officials are fed up at seeing their league, so successful in many years, certainly the most popular worldwide, being laughed at by so many.

The frustration is that all the focus and fury around VAR is taking away from the sight of one of the great sides of the modern era, the European and world champions Liverpool, playing such unbelievable football. The Premier League is now associated with being killjoys, a forensic mission to rule out goals led by Mike Riley. Masters has a big call to make.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57283
  • Location: B16
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: VAR
« Reply #1182 on: January 02, 2020, 05:30:47 PM »
When you have Burnley fans joining in with "it's not football any more" after a decision has gone their way then you know something is seriously wrong. I posted the Villa on Tour video from yesterday and there was virtually no celebration when Wes scored, you're seeing more and more goals scored where players and fans don't celebrate. There is no point to the game if the most important part of a game is being killed. I was in favour of VAR but the version we have is is fucking shit.

Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10746
  • Location: Behind enemy lines, aka Solihull
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: VAR
« Reply #1183 on: January 02, 2020, 05:38:21 PM »
It’s not a big call at all, it’s piss easy. Do it and save the game from this utter chaos

Offline GXVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 42
Re: VAR
« Reply #1184 on: January 02, 2020, 05:41:55 PM »
Being as Richard Masters is a Villa fan, I hope he shares our frustrations. Not sure he's going to sack Riley so early into his role though.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal