I don't think it's irrelevant, I just think signing, for example, one of the Huddersfield players with 60-70 appearances in the premier league to their name, would probably have been a poor decision. I'm intrigued as to who you think we could have got who was the right age, quality and price, with premier league experience, that we missed out on. I can think of a few players that some wanted who are towards the end of their careers and there's a few questionable free transfers around but I honestly can't think of anyone I'd have really wanted that went elsewhere and would've been a realistic option.
Quote from: paul_e on August 09, 2019, 02:47:44 PMI don't think it's irrelevant, I just think signing, for example, one of the Huddersfield players with 60-70 appearances in the premier league to their name, would probably have been a poor decision. I'm intrigued as to who you think we could have got who was the right age, quality and price, with premier league experience, that we missed out on. I can think of a few players that some wanted who are towards the end of their careers and there's a few questionable free transfers around but I honestly can't think of anyone I'd have really wanted that went elsewhere and would've been a realistic option.I haven't watched any PL football for three years so I can't name specific players I'm afraid but I was really talking about policy: did we want to sign experienced PL players but couldn't find or afford them, or did we say experience isn't important, or at least not as important as other factors (age, potential, value for money, resale value)? Looking at our signings you'd have to say it was the latter, a policy decision. I'm not saying they're not PL class, they'll struggle to adapt, they can't do it on a wet Wednesday night in Burnley, or any of those things, just that it's impossible to say at this stage because many of them have no experience of it. Some of them - including Dean - are on a steep learning curve and I think it's unreasonable to expect them to brush past some clubs that have been in the PL all the time we've been away, or longer. They'll be learning on the job without that 60-70 PL games experience to draw on. Patience is the key this season.
“Experienced” managers and players generally have an additional cost attached and it doesn’t necessarily make you a better manager or player. There are countless managers and players that are signed each season without Premier League experience, and go on to being some of the best in the league. In whatever walk of life or job, having the ability, quality, talent and work ethic are more than equal to experience. May be experience isn’t irrelevant but it’s certainly not a requirement to be successful in this league.
12th.Above Southampton, Crystal Palace, Burnley, Bournemouth, Newcastle, Norwich, Brighton and Sheff Utd.
Quote from: KRS on August 09, 2019, 04:39:43 PM“Experienced” managers and players generally have an additional cost attached and it doesn’t necessarily make you a better manager or player. There are countless managers and players that are signed each season without Premier League experience, and go on to being some of the best in the league. In whatever walk of life or job, having the ability, quality, talent and work ethic are more than equal to experience. May be experience isn’t irrelevant but it’s certainly not a requirement to be successful in this league.You've never been to a job interview or filled out an application form where there isn't a whacking great section about previous experience?
Of course I have. Have you never been successful in an interview where you don’t have direct relevant experience but given the position based on your skillset, ability and talent...and then proved to be one of the best appointments the interviewer has ever made?
Fair enough...I’m excellent at interviews and really enjoy them! I think it’s best we agree to disagree on this one hilts! 😊👍