I think we'll keep Whelan too, 12 months to help the transition for the club as a whole, rather than just the first team, would make good sense.
There's no room for sentimentality here unless we want to go straight back down. Fulham spent £100m and were still miles off.
Quote from: Ad@m on May 28, 2019, 03:42:10 PMThere's no room for sentimentality here unless we want to go straight back down. Fulham spent £100m and were still miles off. To play devil's advocate you could argue that the cautionary tale that Fulham offer is that spending huge amounts on a brand new team might not be better than keeping a hard-working team together that play well and is confident after promotion. Fulham provide circumstantial evidence that maybe there is room for sentimentality.
Spending it wisely is far more important than just how much you spend. As we've shown more than once.
It's about spending it well, whether it's £2m or £20m.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on May 28, 2019, 05:33:49 PMSpending it wisely is far more important than just how much you spend. As we've shown more than once.Quite. McGinn cost us £2.7m. He's no worse a player because of that.