Quote from: passport1 on April 29, 2023, 10:48:54 AMI'd limit his responsibilities to showing Prince William to his seat and guffawing at the appropriate time.Ha ha, excellent!
I'd limit his responsibilities to showing Prince William to his seat and guffawing at the appropriate time.
His failings are there for all to see, he is not a very good CEO and the club will be better off when he is gone.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on April 29, 2023, 10:25:17 AMI think there's zero doubt Nas won't be letting Purslow run with any managerial appointments any time soon.Yep, think he's been given one chance - fucked it up massively - isn't likely to be given another.
I think there's zero doubt Nas won't be letting Purslow run with any managerial appointments any time soon.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/aston-villa-vs-liverpool-why-christian-purslow-paul-tyrrell-villains-anfield-a9180396.html
So long as he keeps out of the football side - which I am not sure he has in the past - he is probably ok. Simply because I don’t think the owners would tolerate it if he wasn’t. Hiring and firing CEOs is their world. I do get the general frustration - certainly I would spend more at VP if I could ever get a drink. I am assuming it is outsourced to someone and it might be that these things take time to change due to contracts etc. but I think by hook or by crook we’ll see a much slicker commercial operation in the futureWe have to - today newcastle announced a short deal worth double ours - probably following the Man City model - so to compete at the top we really need every aspect of the club and the way it is ran to be as good as it can
Quote from: dave.woodhall on April 29, 2023, 07:38:32 AMhttps://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/aston-villa-vs-liverpool-why-christian-purslow-paul-tyrrell-villains-anfield-a9180396.htmlIt's interesting, and is of course written by the person who probably most despises him and who he dislikes/mistrusts the most (or his pal Tyrrel does).As Ads says, I think there's a different sense of identity with our clubs, and frankly, that whole time at Liverpool, with the previous owners was a complete shambles. Nonetheless, it does seem that he didn't exactly help himself. I suspect he was being tarred with the same brush, guilty by association.Having said all that, I'm not sure I'm that bothered about the whole thing, because in my view he's not done a lot wrong since he's been with us (barring appointing that knob Gerrard and the Terrace View).
Is the terrace bar really a problem? Nobody has to use it if they don't want to.