One final point. I was in the North Stand for the first time in ages ( great to see Aftab again) and the Holte seemed very quiet.
Onamah allowed Whelan to have his best game for us. Whelan was being asked to do too much and Onamah in a 4-5-1 allows Whelan to be the clean up man as opposed to creator and clean up which he just doesn’t have the legs for.
Need to be winning matches like that by more than 1 goal.
Quote from: Pat McMahon on October 22, 2017, 11:52:49 AMOne final point. I was in the North Stand for the first time in ages ( great to see Aftab again) and the Holte seemed very quiet.It was. A very subdued atmosphere all round I thought, I sit in the Lower Holte and didn’t hear anything from either the North Stand or away fans either.
Happy with the win, not so happy about that poor squirrel by the Holte End.
Quote from: Nastylee on October 21, 2017, 06:43:44 PMI thought Snodgrass was useful today. And it was Conor that should have shot, not Snodgrass. Can see us doing Blues quite easily if we hunt the ball down like that again. It's been ages since we've gone hunting in packs. Yeah I agree. Hourihane could have even put Snodgrass in as another option rather than the pass to Kodija.
I thought Snodgrass was useful today. And it was Conor that should have shot, not Snodgrass. Can see us doing Blues quite easily if we hunt the ball down like that again. It's been ages since we've gone hunting in packs.
Quote from: Comrade Blitz on October 22, 2017, 11:44:33 AMNeed to be winning matches like that by more than 1 goal. Is it four points if we win by more than one?
Quote from: Matt Collins on October 22, 2017, 01:39:30 PMQuote from: Comrade Blitz on October 22, 2017, 11:44:33 AMNeed to be winning matches like that by more than 1 goal. Is it four points if we win by more than one?No smart arse, but teams that get promoted and stay successful tend to win matches by more than a one goal margin.